Suppr超能文献

家用精子检测设备与实验室精子质量分析仪:精子活动浓度比较。

Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration.

机构信息

American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2018 Dec;110(7):1277-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.049. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the ability of the smartphone-based YO Home Sperm Test to accurately and precisely measure motile sperm concentration (MSC) versus the SQA-Vision, an automated laboratory semen analyzer.

DESIGN

MSC compared for the YO device on Galaxy and iPhone smartphones versus the SQA-Vision in a double-blind manner.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENT(S): Donor semen samples from 24 men in 144 aliquots.

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Accuracy, precision, and agreement assessed between the YO device and the SQA-Vision for MSC results.

RESULT(S): The YO device demonstrated good correlation and good to moderate agreement with the SQA-Vision for MSC results up to a range of 94 × 10/mL with Pearson and concordance correlation coefficient above 0.92. The YO also showed a very high level of accuracy (97.8%) with positive and negative percent agreement above 94%. The difference in coefficient of variation between the YO and the SQA-Vision was low (between 9.4% and 11.2%) and not statistically significant. The precision among the YO phone devices was lower (16.0%) than the manufacturer's claim of ≤20%.

CONCLUSION(S): The smartphone-based device has a high level of accuracy and precision when compared with the SQA-Vision. It can detect samples with abnormally "low" MSC (below 6 × 10/mL cutoff), which supports its use as an effective home sperm test for screening "low" and "moderate/normal" MSC cases. In addition, the device effectively identifies varying levels of normal MSC in a precise manner over a wide range of normal MSC. Thus, the YO Score can improve patient satisfaction and empowerment.

摘要

目的

测试基于智能手机的 YO 精子 home 测试在测量精子活动力浓度(MSC)方面的准确性和精密度,与自动化实验室精液分析系统 SQA-Vision 进行对比。

设计

在双盲条件下,将基于智能手机的 YO 设备(Galaxy 和 iPhone 智能手机)与 SQA-Vision 进行 MSC 对比。

地点

学术医疗中心。

患者(s):24 名男性的 144 份捐献精液样本。

干预(s):无。

主要观察指标(s):评估 YO 设备与 SQA-Vision 在 MSC 结果方面的准确性、精密度和一致性。

结果

YO 设备与 SQA-Vision 在 MSC 结果方面相关性良好,一致性较好到中度,范围在 94×10/ml 以内,Pearson 和一致性相关系数均高于 0.92。YO 还显示出非常高的准确性(97.8%),阳性和阴性符合率均高于 94%。YO 与 SQA-Vision 的变异系数差异较低(9.4%至 11.2%),且无统计学意义。YO 手机设备的精密度(16.0%)低于制造商声称的≤20%。

结论

与 SQA-Vision 相比,基于智能手机的设备具有较高的准确性和精密度。它可以检测到 MSC 异常“低”(低于 6×10/ml 截止值)的样本,支持其作为一种有效的家庭精子测试,用于筛选“低”和“中度/正常”MSC 病例。此外,该设备可以在广泛的正常 MSC 范围内以精确的方式有效地识别不同水平的正常 MSC。因此,YO 评分可以提高患者满意度和赋权。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验