Barola Anjana, Tiwari Pramil, Bhansali Anil, Grover Sandeep, Dayal Devi
Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Mohali, India.
Department of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 30;9:638. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00638. eCollection 2018.
Lipohypertrophy has been suggested as an outcome of lipogenic action of insulin and/or injection-related tissue trauma. In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated the predictors of lipohypertrophy in 372 type 1 diabetes patients (mean age 17.1 years) receiving subcutaneous insulin with pen and/or syringes for ≥3 months. On examining injection sites with inspection and palpation technique, 62.1% patients demonstrated lipohypertrophy. Univariate analysis showed that gender, BMI, HbA1c, injection device, rotation, injection area, needle length, insulin regimen, and total daily dose of insulin were associated with lipohypertrophy ( < 0.05). Notably, the mean needle reuse was comparable in patients with or without lipohypertrophy (8.1 vs. 7.2, = 0.534). In multivariate logistic regression, gender, HbA1c, TDD, injection devices, and needle length lost its significance. Further, injections over smaller area (≤8.5 × 5.5 cm) and non-rotation of sites were found to be strongest independent predictor of lipohypertrophy ( < 0.0005 for both) with increased odds of 23.2 (95% CI 9.1-59.2) and 6.3 (95% CI 3.4-11.9) times, respectively. Being underweight was also a significant independent predictor (odds ratio [OR] 13.0 [95% CI 2.2-75.2], = 0.004). Compared to rapid plus long-acting analogs, regular insulin plus long-acting analogs and conventional premixed insulin users had 3.2 (95% CI 1.5-6.8, = 0.003) and 4.6 (95% CI 1.4-15.7, = 0.014) fold higher risk of lipohypertrophy (mean injection frequency 4.01 vs. 4.01 vs. 2.09, respectively). Sub-group analysis showed that lipohypertrophy was 79% less likely in patients with multiple daily injections (≥4) than twice-daily regimen (OR 0.21, < 0.0005). Moreover, lipohypertrophy was reduced to half with bolus doses of rapid-acting insulin analogs than regular insulin ( = 0.003), even though mean injection frequency was comparable (4.01 vs. 3.93, = 0.229). This difference was statistically insignificant for basal doses with NPH or long-acting analogs ( = 0.069). Therefore, injection area, rotation, BMI, and insulin regimen are the best predictors of lipohypertrophy and together could correctly identify lipohypertrophy status in 84.4% patients with excellent discrimination capability (AUC = 0.906, < 0.0005). In conclusion, findings of our study suggest that delivering rapidly absorbed insulin analogs over large injection area along with greater split of total daily doses reduce insulin-induced lipogenesis and outplay tissue trauma added through frequent injections and needle reuse.
脂肪增生被认为是胰岛素脂肪生成作用和/或注射相关组织损伤的结果。在一项横断面研究中,我们评估了372例1型糖尿病患者(平均年龄17.1岁)的脂肪增生预测因素,这些患者使用笔式和/或注射器皮下注射胰岛素≥3个月。通过检查和触诊技术检查注射部位,62.1%的患者出现脂肪增生。单因素分析显示,性别、体重指数(BMI)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、注射装置、轮换、注射部位、针头长度、胰岛素治疗方案以及胰岛素每日总剂量与脂肪增生相关(P<0.05)。值得注意的是,有或无脂肪增生患者的平均针头重复使用次数相当(8.1次对7.2次,P=0.534)。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,性别、HbA1c、每日总剂量(TDD)、注射装置和针头长度失去了其显著性。此外,发现较小注射面积(≤8.5×5.5厘米)注射和不轮换注射部位是脂肪增生最强的独立预测因素(两者P<0.0005),其增加的比值比分别为23.2倍(95%可信区间9.1 - 59.2)和6.3倍(95%可信区间3.4 - 11.9)。体重过轻也是一个显著的独立预测因素(比值比[OR]13.0[95%可信区间2.2 - 75.2],P=0.004)。与速效加长效类似物相比,常规胰岛素加长效类似物使用者和传统预混胰岛素使用者发生脂肪增生的风险分别高3.2倍(95%可信区间1.5 - 6.8,P=0.003)和4.6倍(95%可信区间1.4 - 15.7,P=0.014)(平均注射频率分别为4.01次对4.01次对2.09次)。亚组分析显示,多次每日注射(≥4次)的患者发生脂肪增生的可能性比每日两次注射方案低79%(OR 0.21,P<0.0005)。此外,尽管平均注射频率相当(4.01次对3.93次,P=0.229),但速效胰岛素类似物推注剂量比常规胰岛素导致的脂肪增生减少一半(P=0.003)。对于中效胰岛素(NPH)或长效类似物的基础剂量,这种差异无统计学意义(P=0.069)。因此,注射部位、轮换、BMI和胰岛素治疗方案是脂肪增生的最佳预测因素,它们共同能够在84.4%的患者中正确识别脂肪增生状态,具有出色的鉴别能力(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.906,P<0.0005)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在较大注射部位注射快速吸收的胰岛素类似物以及增加每日总剂量的分割次数可减少胰岛素诱导的脂肪生成,并胜过频繁注射和针头重复使用所增加的组织损伤。