Suppr超能文献

一项评估正确胰岛素注射技术培训对血糖控制影响的随机对照试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Proper Insulin Injection Technique Training on Glycemic Control.

作者信息

Misnikova Inna V, Gubkina Valeria A, Lakeeva Tatyana S, Dreval Alexander V

机构信息

Endocrinology Department, Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2017 Dec;8(6):1309-1318. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0315-y. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Improper injection technique can negatively affect glycemic control and treatment tolerability. We assessed the impact of structured insulin injection training on glycemic control.

METHODS

We compared changes in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose following structured insulin injection training in a 6-month pilot study in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Patients were recruited from mobile clinics in Moscow, Russia, and randomized into three groups. Groups 1 and 2 received structured injection training, and group 3 did not. Group 1 received 4-mm needles sufficient for each injection; groups 2 and 3 provided their own needle supply. Changes in insulin total daily dose (TDD), injection technique, needle reuse, and lipohypertrophy (LH) were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 120 patients enrolled, 116 were included in all analyses (group 1, n = 43; group 2, n = 35; group 3, n = 38). At 6 months, mean [95% CI] reductions in A1C were significant in groups 1 and 2 (- 1.00% [10.9 mmol/mol (- 1.3 to - 0.6)] and - 1.00% [10.9 mmol/mol (- 1.4 to - 0.7)], respectively; P < 0.001 for both), but not in group 3 (- 0.02% [0.2 mmol/mol (- 1.2 to 1.6)]). Increases in insulin TDD, however, were similar and significant across groups (approximately 6 IU; P < 0.05). Injection technique improved, and needle reuse and LH declined in groups 1 and 2, but not in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Little is known about the glycemic impact of insulin injection training. We found that structured training and the use of short pen needles can improve injection technique, leading to significant A1C reductions and decreased rates of LH.

摘要

引言

不当的注射技术会对血糖控制和治疗耐受性产生负面影响。我们评估了结构化胰岛素注射培训对血糖控制的影响。

方法

在一项针对1型或2型糖尿病患者的为期6个月的试点研究中,我们比较了结构化胰岛素注射培训后糖化血红蛋白(A1C)和空腹血糖的变化。患者从俄罗斯莫斯科的流动诊所招募,并随机分为三组。第1组和第2组接受结构化注射培训,第3组未接受。第1组每次注射使用4毫米的针头;第2组和第3组自行提供针头。评估胰岛素每日总剂量(TDD)、注射技术、针头重复使用和脂肪增生(LH)的变化。

结果

在120名入组患者中,116名纳入所有分析(第1组,n = 43;第2组,n = 35;第3组,n = 38)。6个月时,第1组和第2组的A1C平均[95%CI]降低显著(分别为-1.00%[10.9 mmol/mol(-1.3至-0.6)]和-1.00%[10.9 mmol/mol(-1.4至-0.7)];两者P < 0.001),但第3组不显著(-0.02%[0.2 mmol/mol(-1.2至1.6)])。然而,各组胰岛素TDD的增加相似且显著(约6 IU;P < 0.05)。第1组和第2组的注射技术得到改善,针头重复使用和LH减少,但第3组没有。

结论

关于胰岛素注射培训对血糖的影响知之甚少。我们发现结构化培训和使用短笔式针头可改善注射技术,导致A1C显著降低和LH发生率下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0742/5688981/1ee39031bf98/13300_2017_315_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验