Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Martinez-Rubio A, Podczeck A
Hospital of the Westfälische Wilhelms-University of Münster, Department of Internal Medicine C (Cardiology and Angiology), Germany.
Herz. 1988 Jun;13(3):180-7.
Ventricular late potentials in patients after myocardial infarction can be assumed to herald an increased risk of future sudden cardiac death or symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia. This holds particularly true for patients studied early after recent myocardial infarction whereas patients assessed later in the subsequent course have a substantially lesser incidence of arrhythmic events, probably due to intercurrent death of those at high risk. Of prognostic importance appears not only the presence but also the duration of late potentials. A meaningful role is also assumed by the extent of left ventricular functional impairment (EF less than 40%). However, in consideration of the complex mechanisms that can lead to sudden cardiac death, no single method predicts with high sensitivity the occurrence of a ventricular tachyarrhythmic event. Sudden cardiac death can be incurred on the basis of chronic electrophysiological abnormalities as a consequence of regional slow conduction in the border zone of a previous myocardial infarction precipitated by trigger factors such as spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death or symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia can also occur due to sudden and transient changes in the electrophysiological properties of the myocardium due to ischemia. Whether the combination of late potentials with clinical parameters such as ventricular arrhythmias detected in the ambulatory ECG and those induced with programmed electrical stimulation will lead to more accurate identification of patients at risk prerequisites further elucidation. Currently available literature indicates that in patients with late potentials, ventricular tachycardias can be induced more frequently by programmed electrical stimulation and that the combination of both phenomena confers a particularly high risk.
心肌梗死后患者的心室晚电位可被认为预示着未来心脏性猝死或有症状的持续性室性心动过速风险增加。这一点在近期心肌梗死后早期进行研究的患者中尤为如此,而在后续病程中较晚进行评估的患者发生心律失常事件的发生率则显著较低,这可能是由于高危患者的并发死亡。具有预后重要性的不仅是晚电位的存在,还有其持续时间。左心室功能损害程度(射血分数小于40%)也起着重要作用。然而,考虑到可导致心脏性猝死的复杂机制,没有单一方法能以高敏感性预测室性快速心律失常事件的发生。心脏性猝死可能基于慢性电生理异常而发生,这是由先前心肌梗死边缘区的局部缓慢传导所致,由诸如自发性室性心律失常等触发因素诱发。心脏性猝死或有症状的持续性室性心动过速也可能由于缺血导致心肌电生理特性突然和短暂改变而发生。晚电位与动态心电图检测到的室性心律失常以及程控电刺激诱发的室性心律失常等临床参数相结合是否会导致更准确地识别高危患者,这有待进一步阐明。现有文献表明,在有晚电位的患者中,程控电刺激更频繁地诱发室性心动过速,并且这两种现象的结合赋予了特别高的风险。