Suppr超能文献

大规模枪击事件:孩子们在街上比在家里更安全吗?

Mass shootings: Are children safer in the streets than in the home?

作者信息

Levy Marc, Safcsak Karen, Dent Daniel L, Cheatham Michael

机构信息

Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Orlando, FL.

Orlando Health, Orlando, FL.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Though the total fatality and injury count in mass shootings is known, the burden on the pediatric population remains undefined. We sought to define the impact of domestic vs. public mass shootings in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Open-source databases, Everytown for Gun Violence, and Mother Jones were cross-referenced and used to review domestic and public mass shootings from 2009 to 2016. Mass shootings were defined as four or more fatalities and any injuries. Domestic mass shootings were defined as ones that occurred in the home where the assailant was either a family member or a past or present intimate partner of a family member. Public mass shootings occurred in a public space where the shooter was unknown to the victim. The number of incidents in each group, fatalities and injuries, and effect on children <18 years were analyzed along with perpetrator characteristics. Categorical data were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test.

RESULTS

There were 71 Domestic and 31 Public mass shootings accounting for 331 vs. 281 fatalities and 28 vs. 217 injuries (p < 0.0001). Children <18 years accounted for 44% of Domestic and 10% of Public fatalities (p < 0.0001) and 46% vs. 2% of all injuries (p < 0.0001). The assailant was prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm in 32% of Domestic and 39% of Public mass shootings accounting for 54 vs. 25 fatalities.

CONCLUSION

The pediatric fatality rate in mass shootings is alarming, especially among Domestic shooting events. This is a public health issue and requires vigilance to protect at-risk youth.

TYPE OF STUDY

Epidemiology study, retrospective review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

目的

尽管大规模枪击事件中的总死亡和受伤人数已知,但儿科人群所承受的负担仍不明确。我们试图明确家庭内与公共场所大规模枪击事件对儿科人群的影响。

方法

对开源数据库、“枪支暴力问题Everytown”组织和《琼斯母亲》杂志进行交叉引用,并用于回顾2009年至2016年的家庭内和公共场所大规模枪击事件。大规模枪击事件定义为造成4人或更多人死亡以及有人员受伤的事件。家庭内大规模枪击事件定义为发生在家庭中的事件,袭击者为家庭成员或家庭成员的过去或现在的亲密伴侣。公共场所大规模枪击事件发生在公共场所,枪手对受害者来说是陌生人。分析了每组事件的数量、死亡和受伤情况以及对18岁以下儿童的影响,并分析了犯罪者特征。分类数据采用Fisher精确检验进行分析。

结果

有71起家庭内大规模枪击事件和31起公共场所大规模枪击事件,分别造成331人和281人死亡,28人和217人受伤(p<0.0001)。18岁以下儿童占家庭内死亡人数的44%和公共场所死亡人数的10%(p<0.0001),占所有受伤人数的46%和2%(p<0.0001)。在32%的家庭内大规模枪击事件和39%的公共场所大规模枪击事件中,袭击者被禁止拥有或持有枪支,分别造成54人和25人死亡。

结论

大规模枪击事件中的儿科死亡率令人震惊,尤其是在家庭内枪击事件中。这是一个公共卫生问题,需要保持警惕以保护高危青少年。

研究类型

流行病学研究,回顾性研究。

证据级别

四级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验