Suppr超能文献

高梅毒发病率的三级医疗中心中 BioPlex 2200 梅毒总抗体和快速血浆反应素试验的临床性能。

Clinical Performance of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR Assay at a Tertiary Medical Center with a High Rate of Syphilis.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 2;57(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01487-18. Print 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Manual treponemal and nontreponemal serologic testing has historically been used for the diagnosis of syphilis. This approach is simple and reproducible but labor intensive. Recently, the FDA cleared the fully automated BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR assay for the detection of treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies. We evaluated the clinical performance of this assay at a tertiary medical center with a high syphilis prevalence. Prospective consecutively collected ( = 400) and known RPR-positive ( = 100) specimens were compared using predicate manual rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA) methods and the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR assay. Positive and negative percent agreements (PPA and NPA, respectively) between the assays were calculated. The PPA and NPA between the manual and BioPlex 2200 RPR results for the prospective population were 85% (17/20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 69% to 100%) and 98% (373/380; 95% CI, 97% to 99%), respectively. The PPA for the manual RPR-positive population was 88% (88/100; 95% CI, 82% to 94%). Overall, the manual and BioPlex 2200 RPR titers demonstrated 78% (99/127) concordance within ±1 dilution and 94% (120/127) within ±2 dilutions. An interpretation of the syphilis serologic profile using the traditional algorithm showed a concordance of 99.5% in the prospective population and 85% in the manual RPR-positive cohort. The performance of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR assay is comparable to those of manual methods. The high NPA of this assay combined with the ability to automate a historically labor-intensive assay is an appealing attribute for syphilis screening in a high-volume laboratory.

摘要

手动梅毒螺旋体和非梅毒螺旋体血清学检测一直用于梅毒的诊断。这种方法简单且可重复,但劳动强度大。最近,FDA 批准了全自动 BioPlex 2200 梅毒总抗体和快速血浆反应素(RPR)检测法用于检测梅毒螺旋体和非梅毒螺旋体抗体。我们在一家高梅毒流行率的三级医疗中心评估了该检测方法的临床性能。使用预测性手动快速血浆反应素(RPR)和荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA)方法以及 BioPlex 2200 梅毒总抗体和 RPR 检测法对前瞻性连续采集(=400)和已知 RPR 阳性(=100)标本进行比较。计算了各检测方法之间的阳性和阴性百分比符合率(PPA 和 NPA)。前瞻性人群中手动和 BioPlex 2200 RPR 结果之间的 PPA 和 NPA 分别为 85%(17/20;95%置信区间[CI],69%至 100%)和 98%(373/380;95%CI,97%至 99%)。手动 RPR 阳性人群的 PPA 为 88%(88/100;95%CI,82%至 94%)。总体而言,手动和 BioPlex 2200 RPR 滴度在±1 稀释度内有 78%(99/127)的一致性,在±2 稀释度内有 94%(120/127)的一致性。使用传统算法对梅毒血清学图谱进行解读,在前瞻性人群中的一致性为 99.5%,在手动 RPR 阳性队列中的一致性为 85%。BioPlex 2200 梅毒总抗体和 RPR 检测法的性能与手动方法相当。该检测方法的高 NPA 结合了自动化历史上劳动强度大的检测方法的能力,是高容量实验室进行梅毒筛查的一个有吸引力的特性。

相似文献

2
Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis total screen (IgG/IgM) with reflex to an automated rapid plasma reagin test.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jun;33(5):e22878. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22878. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Evaluation of a Multiplex Fully Automated Treponemal and Nontreponemal (Rapid Plasma Reagin) Assay.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Jul 5;152(2):230-236. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz034.
7
Evaluation of the Lumipulse G TP-N Chemiluminescent Immunoassay as a Syphilis Screening Test.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Nov;55(11):3236-3241. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00966-17. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jul 26;56(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00214-18. Print 2018 Aug.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of Three Automated Nontreponemal Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) Tests for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Jun 20;61(6):e0016823. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00168-23. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Brazilian Protocol for Sexually Transmitted Infections 2020: syphilis diagnostic tests.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 May 17;54(suppl 1):e2020630. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-630-2020. eCollection 2021.
5
Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis total screen (IgG/IgM) with reflex to an automated rapid plasma reagin test.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jun;33(5):e22878. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22878. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 26;56(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01165-17. Print 2018 Jan.
2
Traditional versus reverse syphilis algorithms: A comparison at a large academic medical center.
Pract Lab Med. 2017 Apr 29;8:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2017.04.007. eCollection 2017 Aug.
3
Use of Treponemal Screening Assay Strength of Signal to Avoid Unnecessary Confirmatory Testing.
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Dec;43(12):737-740. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000524.
4
The ABCs of STIs: An Update on Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Clin Chem. 2016 Jun;62(6):811-23. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.240234. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
5
Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1-137.
6
Current trend on syphilis diagnosis: issues and challenges.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;808:51-64. doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-1774-9_5.
7
8
It is time to use treponema-specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis.
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jan;50(1):2-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06347-11. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays.
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Apr;49(4):1313-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02555-10. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验