Gochyyev Perman, Wilson Mark
Perman Gochyyev, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way Building, #4205, Berkeley, CA, USA
J Appl Meas. 2018;19(4):338-362.
In this paper, we consider hierarchical and higher-order factor models and the relationship between them, and, in particular, we use Rasch models to focus on the exploration of these models. We present these models, their similarities and/or differences from within the Rasch modeling perspective and discuss their use in various settings. One motivation for this work is that certain well-known similarities and differences between the equivalent models in the two-parameter logistic model (2PL) approach do not apply in the Rasch modeling tradition. Another motivation is that there is some ambiguity as to the potential uses of these models, and we seek to clarify those uses. In recent work in the Item Response Theory (IRT) literature, the estimation of these models has been mostly presented using the Bayesian framework: here we show the use of these models using traditional maximum likelihood methods. We also show how to re-parameterize these models, which in some cases can improve estimation and convergence. These alternative parameterizations are also useful in "translating" suggestions for the 2PL models to the Rasch tradition (since these suggestions involve the interpretation of item discriminations, which are required to be unity in the Rasch tradition). Alternative parameterizations can also be used to clarify the relationship among these models. We discuss the use of these models for modeling multidimensionality and testlet effects and compare the interpretation of the obtained solutions to the interpretation for the multidimenisional Rasch model - a more common approach for accounting multidimensionality in the Rasch tradition. We demonstrate the use of these models using the partial credit model.
在本文中,我们考虑层次和高阶因子模型及其之间的关系,特别是我们使用拉施模型来专注于对这些模型的探索。我们介绍这些模型,从拉施建模的角度阐述它们的异同,并讨论它们在各种情境中的应用。开展这项工作的一个动机是,两参数逻辑模型(2PL)方法中等价模型之间某些众所周知的异同并不适用于拉施建模传统。另一个动机是,这些模型的潜在用途存在一些模糊性,我们试图澄清这些用途。在项目反应理论(IRT)文献的近期工作中,这些模型的估计大多是在贝叶斯框架下呈现的:在此我们展示使用传统最大似然法对这些模型的应用。我们还展示了如何对这些模型进行重新参数化,在某些情况下这可以改善估计和收敛。这些替代参数化在将2PL模型的建议“转换”到拉施传统中也很有用(因为这些建议涉及项目区分度的解释,而在拉施传统中要求其为单位1)。替代参数化还可用于阐明这些模型之间的关系。我们讨论这些模型在多维性建模和分测验效应建模中的应用,并将所得解的解释与多维拉施模型的解释进行比较——多维拉施模型是拉施传统中处理多维性的一种更常用方法。我们使用部分计分模型演示这些模型的应用。