Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology, and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellon, Spain.
CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 15;13(11):e0207396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207396. eCollection 2018.
The advantages of transdiagnostic protocols for emotional disorders (ED) (anxiety and depression) include the ability to treat multiple psychological disorders using the same treatment protocol, and the capacity to better address comorbidity. Comorbidity in ED has been associated with higher rates of severity, functional impairment, and chronicity. However, no attempts have been made in the literature to systematically review whether these studies include assessments to evaluate the treatment response in comorbid diagnoses, in addition to the principal diagnosis. Moreover, transdiagnostic treatments have been developed for a range of ED, but to date no study has analyzed the real distribution of diagnoses in these studies. The current study aimed to analyze: a) whether treatment response in comorbidity is evaluated in transdiagnostic treatments for ED; b) what diagnoses are targeted in transdiagnostic treatments for ED; and c) the real distribution of the diagnoses at baseline in these studies. A systematic search of the literature was conducted in PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Fifty-two randomized controlled trials were identified, with a total of 7007 adult participants. The results showed that, although most of the studies reported data on comorbidity at baseline, only 40% of them examined the effects of the intervention on the comorbid disorders. The most commonly targeted diagnoses in transdiagnostic protocols were panic/agoraphobia, generalized anxiety, social anxiety, and depression. Other disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and anxiety/depression not otherwise specified, were marginally included in these studies. Regarding the distribution of diagnoses at baseline, generalized anxiety, panic/agoraphobia, social anxiety, and depression were the most frequently observed, whereas depression not otherwise specified was the least represented. The results highlight the importance of assessing comorbidity in addition to the principal diagnoses in transdiagnostic treatments, in order to draw conclusions about the true potential of these interventions to improve comorbid symptoms. Implications of the current study and directions for future research are discussed.
情感障碍(ED)(焦虑和抑郁)的跨诊断方案具有多种优势,包括能够使用相同的治疗方案治疗多种心理障碍,以及更好地解决共病问题的能力。ED 中的共病与更严重的程度、功能障碍和慢性化有关。然而,文献中尚未尝试系统地审查这些研究是否包括评估主要诊断以外的共病诊断的治疗反应的评估。此外,已经为多种 ED 开发了跨诊断治疗方法,但迄今为止,尚无研究分析这些研究中这些诊断的真实分布。本研究旨在分析:a)ED 的跨诊断治疗是否评估了共病的治疗反应;b)ED 的跨诊断治疗针对哪些诊断;c)这些研究中基线时的真实诊断分布。对 PsycINFO、PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 进行了系统的文献检索。确定了 52 项随机对照试验,共有 7007 名成年参与者。结果表明,尽管大多数研究报告了基线时共病的数据,但只有 40%的研究检查了干预对共病的影响。跨诊断方案中最常针对的诊断是恐慌/恐惧症、广泛性焦虑症、社交焦虑症和抑郁症。强迫症、创伤后应激障碍和未特指的焦虑/抑郁等其他障碍也在这些研究中略有涉及。关于基线时的诊断分布,广泛性焦虑症、恐慌/恐惧症、社交焦虑症和抑郁症最为常见,而未特指的抑郁症则最为少见。结果强调了在跨诊断治疗中除主要诊断外还评估共病的重要性,以便得出关于这些干预措施真正改善共病症状的潜力的结论。讨论了当前研究的影响和未来研究的方向。