• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式迷走神经刺激装置与植入式心律管理装置之间的电相互作用。

Electrical Interaction between Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device and Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Device.

作者信息

Libbus Imad, Mazar Scott T, Stubbs Scott R, KenKnight Bruce H

出版信息

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:3681-3684. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513067.

DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513067
PMID:30441171
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Autonomic regulation therapy via vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was recently approved as a therapy for chronic heart failure, and will likely be utilized in patients who are also indicated for cardiac rhythm management device implantation. This study is designed to assess the degree to which VNS is likely to cause interference in the cardiac sensing of an implantable cardiac rhythm management device.

METHODS

A VNS stimulation lead and a cardiac sensing lead were placed in a simulated biological medium. A nonconductive carrier frame was used to position the leads at a precise electrode spacing. Stimulation was delivered through the VNS Therapy lead at a maximum output current and a variety of combinations of stimulation frequencies from 5-30 Hz and stimulation pulse widths from 130-1000 μs. The electrode spacing began at 0 cm and was increased in 1 cm increments until the measured signal dropped below the cardiac rhythm management device noise floor for sensing. The test was conducted with both bipolar and unipolar sensing.

RESULTS

In the bipolar sensing configuration, the maximum sensed signal amplitude was 687 μV at an electrode separation of 0 cm, signal frequency of 30 Hz, pulse width of 1000 μs, and output current of 3.5 mA. In the unipolar sensing configuration, the maximum amplitude was 406 μV. In both configurations, the measured signal with maximum stimulation intensity decreased significantly with electrode separation, and dropped below the noise floor at an electrode spacing of 3.0 cm. The sensed signal amplitude was further attenuated at lower stimulation amplitudes and pulse widths.

CONCLUSION

Even at maximum neural stimulation intensity of 3.5 mA, at an electrode separation of at least 3.0 cm, neural stimulation did not result in a detectable level of interference with either bipolar or unipolar sensing. Because this separation is significantly smaller than the minimum electrode separation of 15 cm in clinical practice, VNS Therapy is not expected to interfere with the function of implantable cardiac devices.

摘要

背景

通过迷走神经刺激(VNS)进行的自主神经调节疗法最近被批准用于治疗慢性心力衰竭,并且可能会应用于同时还需要植入心脏节律管理设备的患者。本研究旨在评估VNS对植入式心脏节律管理设备心脏感知功能产生干扰的可能性。

方法

将一根VNS刺激导线和一根心脏感知导线置于模拟生物介质中。使用一个非导电载体框架将导线以精确的电极间距定位。通过VNS治疗导线以最大输出电流以及5 - 30Hz的多种刺激频率组合和130 - 1000μs的刺激脉冲宽度进行刺激。电极间距从0cm开始,以1cm的增量增加,直至测量信号降至心脏节律管理设备的感知噪声阈值以下。该测试采用双极和单极感知方式进行。

结果

在双极感知配置中,在电极间距为0cm、信号频率为30Hz、脉冲宽度为1000μs且输出电流为3.5mA时,最大感知信号幅度为687μV。在单极感知配置中,最大幅度为406μV。在两种配置中,最大刺激强度下的测量信号随电极间距的增加而显著降低,并在电极间距为3.0cm时降至噪声阈值以下。在较低的刺激幅度和脉冲宽度下,感知信号幅度进一步衰减。

结论

即使在3.5mA的最大神经刺激强度下,电极间距至少为3.0cm时,神经刺激也不会对双极或单极感知产生可检测到的干扰水平。由于该间距明显小于临床实践中15cm的最小电极间距,因此预计VNS治疗不会干扰植入式心脏设备的功能。

相似文献

1
Electrical Interaction between Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device and Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Device.植入式迷走神经刺激装置与植入式心律管理装置之间的电相互作用。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:3681-3684. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513067.
2
Defining the neural fulcrum for chronic vagus nerve stimulation: implications for integrated cardiac control.定义慢性迷走神经刺激的神经枢轴:对心脏整合控制的影响。
J Physiol. 2017 Nov 15;595(22):6887-6903. doi: 10.1113/JP274678. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
3
Vagus nerve stimulation: An evolving adjunctive treatment for cardiac disease.迷走神经刺激:一种不断发展的心脏病辅助治疗方法。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;16(10):804-810. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7129.
4
Acute Autonomic Engagement Assessed by Heart Rate Dynamics During Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Heart Failure in the ANTHEM-HF Trial.在ANTHEM-HF试验中,通过心力衰竭患者迷走神经刺激期间的心率动态评估急性自主神经参与情况。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Sep;27(9):1072-7. doi: 10.1111/jce.13017. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
5
Implantable vagus nerve stimulation system performance is not affected by internal or external defibrillation shocks.植入式迷走神经刺激系统的性能不受内部或外部除颤电击的影响。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Apr;63(3):555-560. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01050-7. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
Influence of Vagus Nerve Stimulation parameters on chronotropism and inotropism in heart failure.迷走神经刺激参数对心力衰竭时变时性和变力性的影响。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:526-9. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943644.
7
Autonomic regulation therapy suppresses quantitative T-wave alternans and improves baroreflex sensitivity in patients with heart failure enrolled in the ANTHEM-HF study.自主调节治疗可抑制心力衰竭患者定量 T 波交替,并改善 ANTHEM-HF 研究中的患者压力感受反射敏感性。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Mar;13(3):721-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.11.030. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Quantitative evaluation of heartbeat interval time series using Poincaré analysis reveals distinct patterns of heart rate dynamics during cycles of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with heart failure.使用庞加莱分析对心跳间隔时间序列进行定量评估,揭示了心力衰竭患者在迷走神经刺激周期中心率动态的不同模式。
J Electrocardiol. 2017 Nov-Dec;50(6):898-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
9
Compatibility of transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and vagus nerve stimulation device: a case report.经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器与迷走神经刺激装置的兼容性:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Apr 23;8(5):ytae214. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae214. eCollection 2024 May.
10
The interaction of pulse width and current intensity on the extent of cortical plasticity evoked by vagus nerve stimulation.脉宽和电流强度对迷走神经刺激诱发皮质可塑性程度的相互影响。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Development of a New Vagus Nerve Simulation Electroceutical to Improve the Signal Attenuation in a Living Implant Environment.开发新型迷走神经模拟电子设备以改善活体植入环境中的信号衰减。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 16;24(10):3172. doi: 10.3390/s24103172.
2
Left-sided vagus nerve stimulation improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in rats as effectively as right-sided vagus nerve stimulation.左侧迷走神经刺激改善大鼠心肺复苏结局的效果与右侧迷走神经刺激一样有效。
World J Emerg Med. 2021;12(4):309-316. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.04.010.
3
Implantable vagus nerve stimulation system performance is not affected by internal or external defibrillation shocks.
植入式迷走神经刺激系统的性能不受内部或外部除颤电击的影响。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Apr;63(3):555-560. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01050-7. Epub 2021 Aug 31.