• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策支持系统对结肠镜息肉切除术后监测建议指南依从性的影响。

Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-1328. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050.

DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050
PMID:30442733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7210781/
Abstract

Surveillance colonoscopy is required in patients with polyps due to an elevated colorectal cancer (CRC) risk; however, studies suggest substantial overuse and underuse of surveillance colonoscopy. The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy at a safety-net healthcare system before (n=1,822) and after (n=1,320) implementation of CoRS in December 2013. Recommendations were classified as guideline-adherent or nonadherent according to the US Multi-Society Task Force on CRC. We defined surveillance recommendations shorter and longer than guideline recommendations as potential overuse and underuse, respectively. We used multivariable generalized linear mixed models to identify correlates of guideline-adherent recommendations. The proportion of guideline-adherent surveillance recommendations was significantly higher post-CoRS than pre-CoRS (84.6% vs 77.4%; <.001), with fewer recommendations for potential overuse and underuse. In the post-CoRS period, CoRS was used for 89.8% of cases and, compared with cases for which it was not used, was associated with a higher proportion of guideline-adherent recommendations (87.0% vs 63.4%; RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23-1.42). In multivariable analysis, surveillance recommendations were also more likely to be guideline-adherent in patients with adenomas but less likely among those with fair bowel preparation and those with family history of CRC. Of 203 nonadherent recommendations, 70.4% were considered potential overuse, 20.2% potential underuse, and 9.4% were not provided surveillance recommendations. An EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.

摘要

监测结肠镜检查适用于结直肠癌(CRC)风险升高的患者;然而,研究表明,监测结肠镜检查存在大量过度使用和使用不足的情况。本研究的目的是描述在实施基于电子病历(EMR)的结肠镜检查病理报告和临床决策支持系统(CoRS)后,监测建议的指南遵循情况。我们对 2013 年 12 月在一个医疗保障系统中接受结肠镜检查和息肉切除术的患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者在实施 CoRS 前(n=1822)和后(n=1320)分别分为两组。建议根据美国多学会 CRC 工作组分为符合或不符合指南。我们将短于或长于指南建议的监测建议分别定义为潜在过度使用和使用不足。我们使用多变量广义线性混合模型来确定符合指南建议的相关因素。与实施 CoRS 前相比,实施 CoRS 后符合指南的监测建议比例显著提高(84.6%比 77.4%;<0.001),潜在过度使用和使用不足的建议减少。在 CoRS 实施后,89.8%的病例使用了 CoRS,与未使用 CoRS 的病例相比,符合指南建议的比例更高(87.0%比 63.4%;RR,1.34;95%CI,1.23-1.42)。多变量分析显示,腺瘤患者的监测建议更有可能符合指南,而肠道准备情况一般和有 CRC 家族史的患者的监测建议更不可能符合指南。在 203 条不符合指南的建议中,70.4%被认为是潜在过度使用,20.2%是潜在使用不足,9.4%未提供监测建议。基于 EMR 的 CoRS 得到了广泛应用,显著提高了监测建议的指南遵循度。

相似文献

1
Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy.临床决策支持系统对结肠镜息肉切除术后监测建议指南依从性的影响。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-1328. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050.
2
Predictors of guideline concordance for surveillance colonoscopy recommendations in patients at a safety-net health system.安全网医疗系统中患者监测结肠镜检查建议的指南一致性预测因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Nov;26(11):1653-60. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0661-x. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Post-polypectomy Guideline Adherence: Importance of Belief in Guidelines, Not Guideline Knowledge or Fear of Missed Cancer.息肉切除术后指南遵循情况:对指南的信念的重要性,而非指南知识或对漏诊癌症的恐惧。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):2937-45. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x. Epub 2015 May 7.
4
Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中医生不遵守结肠镜检查间隔指南。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct;149(4):938-51. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
5
[Impact of implementation strategies on adherence rates to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines after polypectomy in a university hospital].[大学医院息肉切除术后实施策略对结直肠癌(CRC)指南依从率的影响]
Z Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;51(10):1157-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335081. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
6
Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern Colonoscopy Reporting System (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations.为基于证据的结肠癌监测建议开发帕克兰-德克萨斯大学西南分校结肠镜检查报告系统(CoRS)。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):402-6. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv081. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
7
Interval Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Role of Guideline Adherence.炎症性肠病中的间隔期结直肠癌:指南遵循的作用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05754-9. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.低风险大肠腺瘤患者结肠镜监测间隔较短的相关因素及其对结局的影响
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1933-1943.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications.大多数过早的监测结肠镜检查并非归因于肠道准备或新的临床指征。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Sep;61(9):2496-504. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4177-3. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.息肉切除术后监测指南的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jul;51(7):673-683. doi: 10.1055/a-0865-2082. Epub 2019 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional and Novel Colonoscopy Quality Metrics: What's Important in 2025.传统与新型结肠镜检查质量指标:2025年的关键要点
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Aug 8;27(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-01006-1.
2
The Effect of an EHR Order Set on Cancer Screening Order Rates in Community-Based Health Centers.电子健康记录医嘱集对社区卫生中心癌症筛查医嘱率的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 May;16(3):496-506. doi: 10.1055/a-2524-5076. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
Implementing a closed loop clinical decision support system for sustainable preoperative care.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy Depends on Adequate Bowel Preparation Rates - A Modeling Study.结肠镜筛查的成本效益取决于充分的肠道准备率——一项建模研究
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167452. eCollection 2016.
2
A Novel Electronic Medical Record-Based Workflow to Measure and Report Colonoscopy Quality Measures.一种基于新型电子病历的工作流程,用于测量和报告结肠镜检查质量指标。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):333-337.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.001.
3
Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions.
实施用于可持续术前护理的闭环临床决策支持系统。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 3;8(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01371-7.
4
Colonoscopy quality measures and adherence to follow-up guidelines among endoscopists participating in a U.S. endoscopy registry.参与美国内镜检查登记系统的内镜医师的结肠镜检查质量指标及对随访指南的遵循情况。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan;101(1):168-177.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.07.027. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Improving Concordance Between Clinicians With Australian Guidelines for Bowel Cancer Prevention Using a Digital Application: Randomized Controlled Crossover Study.使用数字应用程序提高临床医生与澳大利亚肠癌预防指南的一致性:随机对照交叉研究
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Feb 22;10:e46625. doi: 10.2196/46625.
6
Development and Evaluation of a Surveillance System for Follow-Up After Colorectal Polypectomy.开发和评估结直肠息肉切除术后随访监测系统。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2334822. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34822.
7
Uptake of a Cervical Cancer Clinical Decision Support Tool: A Mixed-Methods Study.接受宫颈癌临床决策支持工具:一项混合方法研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):594-599. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769913. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
8
Measuring and Improving Quality of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.测量与提高用于结直肠癌筛查的结肠镜检查质量。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;24(3):269-283. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
9
Clinician based decision tool to guide recommended interval between colonoscopies: development and evaluation pilot study.基于临床医生的决策工具,指导推荐结肠镜检查的间隔时间:开发和评估初步研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 17;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01872-z.
结肠镜检查后发生的间隔期结直肠癌:探寻原因与解决办法
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;110(12):1657-64; quiz 1665. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.365. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中结肠镜检查在重复筛查和监测方面的使用不足与过度使用情况。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;14(3):436-444.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
Predictors of guideline concordance for surveillance colonoscopy recommendations in patients at a safety-net health system.安全网医疗系统中患者监测结肠镜检查建议的指南一致性预测因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Nov;26(11):1653-60. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0661-x. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
6
Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern Colonoscopy Reporting System (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations.为基于证据的结肠癌监测建议开发帕克兰-德克萨斯大学西南分校结肠镜检查报告系统(CoRS)。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):402-6. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv081. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
7
Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中医生不遵守结肠镜检查间隔指南。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct;149(4):938-51. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Post-polypectomy Guideline Adherence: Importance of Belief in Guidelines, Not Guideline Knowledge or Fear of Missed Cancer.息肉切除术后指南遵循情况:对指南的信念的重要性,而非指南知识或对漏诊癌症的恐惧。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):2937-45. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Comparing the effectiveness of competing tests for reducing colorectal cancer mortality: a network meta-analysis.比较竞争性检测对降低结直肠癌死亡率的有效性:一项网状Meta分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):700-709.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.033.
10
Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.良好优于优秀:肠道准备质量与腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):691-699.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.032.