Kumar Amit, Solanki Sohan Lal, Gangakhedkar Gauri Raman, Shylasree T S, Sharma Kailash S
Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):773-779. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_437_18.
Patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery after chemotherapy and requiring opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) are at high-risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We aimed to assess the effect of palonosetron and dexamethasone combination for these patients for prevention of PONV.
This study included 2 groups and 150 patients. At the time of wound closure, patients in group A received ondansetron 8 mg intravenous (IV) + dexamethasone 4 mg IV and group B received palonosetron 0.075 mg IV + dexamethasone 4 mg IV. Postoperatively for 48 hours, group A patients received ondansetron 4 mg 8 hourly IV, group B patients received normal saline 8 hourly IV in 2 cc syringe. The primary objective was the overall incidence of PONV. Independent -test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used and multivariate regression analysis was done.
Vomiting was significantly higher in group A (37.3%) as compared with group B (21.3%) at 0-48 hours ( = 0.031). Significantly more patients in Group A had nausea as compared with group B at 90-120 minutes (30.66% vs 18.66%, = 0.043) and 6-24 hours (32.0% vs 22.66%, = 0.029). PCA opioid usage in microgram was significantly higher in group A at 0-24 hours (690.53 ± 332.57 vs 576.85 ± 250.79, = 0.024) and 0-48 hours (1126.10 ± 512.18 vs 952.13 ± 353.85, = 0.030).
Palonosetron with dexamethasone is more effective than ondasetron with dexamethasone for prevention of PONV in post-chemotherapy ovarian cancer surgeries receiving opioid-based patient controlled analgesia.
接受化疗后行卵巢癌手术且需要基于阿片类药物的患者自控镇痛(PCA)的患者,术后恶心呕吐(PONV)风险较高。我们旨在评估帕洛诺司琼与地塞米松联合用药对这些患者预防PONV的效果。
本研究纳入2组共150例患者。在伤口缝合时,A组患者静脉注射8毫克昂丹司琼+4毫克地塞米松,B组患者静脉注射0.075毫克帕洛诺司琼+4毫克地塞米松。术后48小时内,A组患者每8小时静脉注射4毫克昂丹司琼,B组患者每8小时通过2毫升注射器静脉注射生理盐水。主要目标是PONV的总体发生率。使用独立样本t检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,并进行多因素回归分析。
在0至48小时,A组的呕吐发生率(37.3%)显著高于B组(21.3%)(P = 0.031)。在90至120分钟(30.66%对18.66%,P = 0.043)和6至24小时(32.0%对22.66%,P = 0.029),A组恶心的患者明显多于B组。在0至24小时(690.53±332.57对576.85±250.79,P = 0.024)和0至48小时(1126.10±512.18对952.13±353.85,P = 0.030),A组以微克计的PCA阿片类药物使用量显著更高。
在接受基于阿片类药物患者自控镇痛的化疗后卵巢癌手术中,帕洛诺司琼与地塞米松联合用药预防PONV比昂丹司琼与地塞米松联合用药更有效。