Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Feb;67(2):232-238. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15642. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In population studies, most individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) do not progress to dementia in the near term, but rather remain stable MCI or revert to normal cognition. Here, we characterized MCI subgroups with different outcomes over 5 years.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A population-based cohort (N=1603).
Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR); self-reported medical conditions, subjective cognitive concerns, self-rated health, depressive symptoms, blood pressure, medications, blood pressure, APOE genotype, cognitive domain composite scores.
We compared 3 MCI subgroups who progressed to dementia (n=86), stabilized at MCI (n=384), or reverted to normal (n=252), to those who remained consistently normal (n=881), defining MCI as CDR = 0.5 and dementia as CDR≥1. Using multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, we examined the associations of each group with selected baseline characteristics.
With the normal group for reference, worse subjective cognitive concerns, functional impairments, self-rated health, and depressive symptoms were associated with being in any MCI group. Taking more prescription medications was associated with being in the stable MCI and reverter groups; diabetes and low diastolic blood pressure were associated with stable MCI. The APOE4 genotype was associated with stable and progressive MCI; stroke was associated with progressive MCI. All MCI subgroups were likely to have lower mean composite scores in all cognitive domains and more operationally defined impairments in attention, language, and executive function; reverters were more likely to lack memory and visuospatial impairments.
MCI subgroups with different 5-year outcomes had some distinct characteristics suggesting different underlying causes. The progressors, unlike the reverters, had a profile broadly typical of Alzheimer's disease; the stable MCIs had other, including vascular, morbidity. These data shed light on the heterogeneity of MCI in the population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:232-238, 2019.
背景/目的:在人群研究中,大多数轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者在近期内不会进展为痴呆,但仍保持稳定的 MCI 或恢复正常认知。在这里,我们描述了在 5 年内具有不同结局的 MCI 亚组。
设置/参与者:一项基于人群的队列研究(N=1603)。
临床痴呆评定量表(CDR);自我报告的医疗状况、主观认知问题、自我报告的健康状况、抑郁症状、血压、药物治疗、血压、APOE 基因型、认知域综合评分。
我们比较了进展为痴呆(n=86)、稳定为 MCI(n=384)或恢复为正常(n=252)的 3 个 MCI 亚组与始终保持正常的(n=881),将 MCI 定义为 CDR=0.5 且痴呆为 CDR≥1。使用调整了人口统计学因素的多项逻辑回归模型,我们检查了每个组与选定基线特征的关联。
以正常组为参考,更严重的主观认知问题、功能障碍、自我报告的健康状况和抑郁症状与任何 MCI 组相关。服用更多的处方药与稳定的 MCI 和恢复组相关;糖尿病和低血压与稳定的 MCI 相关。APOE4 基因型与稳定和进展性 MCI 相关;中风与进展性 MCI 相关。所有 MCI 亚组的所有认知域的平均综合评分均较低,注意力、语言和执行功能的操作性定义障碍更为常见;恢复者更可能缺乏记忆和视空间障碍。
具有不同 5 年结局的 MCI 亚组具有一些不同的特征,表明不同的潜在原因。与恢复者不同,进展者的特征广泛类似于阿尔茨海默病;稳定的 MCI 有其他病因,包括血管性疾病。这些数据揭示了人群中 MCI 的异质性。J Am Geriatr Soc 67:232-238, 2019.