Comparison of effects of four treatment methods for unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

The optimal internal fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fracture remains a matter of controversy. By performing network meta-analysis, we developed a ranking of the following four surgical methods: proximal femoral nail antirotation, InterTan nail, gamma nail (GN) and sliding hip screws. We compare the complication rates in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After an exhaustive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies, randomized controlled trials meeting selection criteria were entered into our network meta-analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 13.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

We included 12 randomized controlled trials. Compared to Sliding hip screw, there were no substantial differences in rates of complications in unstable intertrochanteric fractures patient undergoing various treatments (all p > 0.05). Nevertheless, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for GN (80.6%) was significantly higher than those of the other three methods.

CONCLUSION

GN had the highest probability of reducing the total incidence of complications among the four interventions for treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures.