• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经病理性起源慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激筛查试验是否具有临床实用性和成本效益?(TRIAL-STIM研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Eldabe Sam, Gulve Ashish, Thomson Simon, Baranidharan Ganesan, Duarte Rui, Jowett Susan, Sandhu Harbinder, Chadwick Raymond, Brookes Morag, Tariq Anisah, Earle Jenny, Bell Jill, Kansal Anu, Rhodes Shelley, Taylor Rod S

机构信息

The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.

Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals, Basildon, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Nov 16;19(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2993-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-018-2993-9
PMID:30446003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6240171/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The TRIAL-STIM Study aims to assess the diagnostic performance, clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a screening trial prior to full implantation of a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) device.

METHODS/DESIGN: The TRIAL-STIM Study is a superiority, parallel-group, three-centre, randomised controlled trial in patients with chronic neuropathic pain with a nested qualitative study and economic evaluation. The study will take place in three UK centres: South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (The James Cook University Hospital); Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. A total of 100 adults undergoing SCS implantation for the treatment of neuropathy will be included. Subjects will be recruited from the outpatient clinics of the three participating sites and randomised to undergo a screening trial prior to SCS implant or an implantation-only strategy in a 1:1 ratio. Allocation will be stratified by centre and minimised on patient age (≥ 65 or < 65 years), gender, presence of failed back surgery syndrome (or not) and use of high frequency (HF10™) (or not). The primary outcome measure is the numerical rating scale (NRS) at 6 months compared between the screening trial and implantation strategy and the implantation-only strategy. Secondary outcome measures will include diagnostic accuracy, the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% and 30% pain relief at 6 months as measured on the NRS, health-related quality-of-life (EQ-5D), function (Oswestry Disability Index), patient satisfaction (Patients' Global Impression of Change) and complication rates. A nested qualitative study will be carried out in parallel for a total of 30 of the patients recruited in each centre (10 at each centre) to explore their views of the screening trial, implantation and overall use of the SCS device. The economic evaluation will take the form of a cost-utility analysis.

DISCUSSION

The TRIAL-STIM Study is a randomised controlled trial with a nested qualitative study and economic evaluation aiming to determine the clinical utility of screening trials of SCS as well as their cost-effectiveness. The nested qualitative study will seek to explore the patient's view of the screening trials, implantation and overall use of SCS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, ISRCTN60778781 . Registered on 15 August 2017.

摘要

背景

TRIAL-STIM研究旨在评估在完全植入脊髓刺激(SCS)设备之前进行筛查试验的诊断性能、临床结果和成本效益。

方法/设计:TRIAL-STIM研究是一项针对慢性神经性疼痛患者的优效性、平行组、三中心随机对照试验,同时进行嵌套定性研究和经济评估。该研究将在英国的三个中心进行:南泰晤士医院国民保健服务信托基金(詹姆斯库克大学医院);巴西尔登和瑟罗克大学医院国民保健服务信托基金;以及利兹教学医院国民保健服务信托基金。总共将纳入100名接受SCS植入治疗神经病变的成年人。研究对象将从三个参与地点的门诊诊所招募,并按1:1的比例随机分为在SCS植入前进行筛查试验或仅采用植入策略。分配将按中心分层,并根据患者年龄(≥65岁或<65岁)、性别、是否存在失败的脊柱手术综合征以及是否使用高频(HF10™)进行最小化。主要结局指标是筛查试验与植入策略和仅植入策略相比,6个月时的数字评分量表(NRS)。次要结局指标将包括诊断准确性、6个月时在NRS上测量的至少实现50%和30%疼痛缓解的患者比例、健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D)、功能(Oswestry残疾指数)、患者满意度(患者对变化的总体印象)和并发症发生率。将对每个中心招募的30名患者(每个中心10名)同时进行嵌套定性研究,以探讨他们对筛查试验、植入和SCS设备总体使用的看法。经济评估将采用成本效用分析的形式。

讨论

TRIAL-STIM研究是一项随机对照试验,同时进行嵌套定性研究和经济评估,旨在确定SCS筛查试验的临床效用及其成本效益。嵌套定性研究将试图探索患者对筛查试验、植入和SCS总体使用的看法。

试验注册

ISRCTN,ISRCTN60778781。于2017年8月15日注册。

相似文献

1
Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.神经病理性起源慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激筛查试验是否具有临床实用性和成本效益?(TRIAL-STIM研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 16;19(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2993-9.
2
Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic low back pain (MODULATE-LBP): a trial protocol.多中心、双盲、随机、假刺激对照的 10 kHz 高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性神经性腰痛的研究(MODULATE-LBP):研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3831-4.
3
Does a screening trial for spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain of neuropathic origin have clinical utility and cost-effectiveness (TRIAL-STIM)? A randomised controlled trial.一项针对神经性慢性疼痛患者进行脊髓刺激筛查试验的临床实用性和成本效益研究(TRIAL-STIM):一项随机对照试验。
Pain. 2020 Dec;161(12):2820-2829. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001977.
4
Efficacy of different spinal cord stimulation paradigms for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain (PARS-trial): study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled crossover trial.不同脊髓刺激范式治疗慢性神经性疼痛的疗效(PARS 试验):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照交叉试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jan 25;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-05013-7.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛的有效性和成本效益(RASCAL 研究):一项先导随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Feb 22;14:57. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-57.
6
Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin Have Clinical Utility (TRIAL-STIM)? 36-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.脊髓刺激筛查试验在神经病理性慢性疼痛患者中的临床应用价值如何(TRIAL-STIM)?一项随机对照试验的 36 个月结果。
Neurosurgery. 2023 Jan 1;92(1):75-82. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002165. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
7
To Trial or Not to Trial Before Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: The Patients' View From the TRIAL-STIM Randomized Controlled Trial.在脊髓刺激治疗慢性神经性疼痛之前是否进行试验:来自 TRIAL-STIM 随机对照试验的患者观点。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):459-470. doi: 10.1111/ner.13316. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluation of Chuna manual therapy for chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.中医整脊手法治疗慢性颈痛的比较疗效与经济学评价:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3016-6.
9
Assessment of economic effectiveness in treatment of neuropathic pain and refractory angina pectoris using spinal cord stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗神经性疼痛和难治性心绞痛的经济学效果评估。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;21(5):653-63.
10
Trial Versus No Trial of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: Cost Analysis in United Kingdom National Health Service.脊髓刺激治疗慢性神经性疼痛:英国国家医疗服务体系中的成本分析——试验与非试验对比
Neuromodulation. 2019 Feb;22(2):208-214. doi: 10.1111/ner.12898. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris: Current Status and Future Perspectives, a Narrative Review.脊髓刺激治疗顽固性心绞痛:现状与未来展望,一篇叙述性综述。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jan 20;12(1):33. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12010033.
2
Trial or not trial in the practice of spinal cord stimulation. That's the question.脊髓刺激治疗中是否进行试验。这就是问题所在。
Interv Pain Med. 2023 Aug 31;2(3):100274. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100274. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Evidence-based consensus guidelines on patient selection and trial stimulation for spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic non-cancer pain.

本文引用的文献

1
The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Safety Guidelines for the Reduction of Severe Neurological Injury.神经刺激适宜性共识委员会(NACC)降低严重神经损伤的安全指南。
Neuromodulation. 2017 Jan;20(1):15-30. doi: 10.1111/ner.12564. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
2
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 2015:报告诊断准确性研究的必备项目更新清单。
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
3
The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina (RASCAL Study): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
脊髓刺激疗法治疗慢性非癌痛的患者选择和试验刺激的循证共识指南。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun;48(6):273-287. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104097. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Research design considerations for randomized controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation for pain: Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials/Institute of Neuromodulation/International Neuromodulation Society recommendations.随机对照试验中脊髓刺激治疗疼痛的研究设计考虑因素:临床试验方法、测量和疼痛评估倡议/神经调节学会/国际神经调节学会建议。
Pain. 2021 Jul 1;162(7):1935-1956. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002204.
5
To Trial or Not to Trial Before Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: The Patients' View From the TRIAL-STIM Randomized Controlled Trial.在脊髓刺激治疗慢性神经性疼痛之前是否进行试验:来自 TRIAL-STIM 随机对照试验的患者观点。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):459-470. doi: 10.1111/ner.13316. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
How to Restart the Interventional Activity in the COVID-19 Era: The Experience of a Private Pain Unit in Spain.如何在 COVID-19 时代重启介入治疗活动:西班牙一家私人疼痛科的经验。
Pain Pract. 2020 Nov;20(8):820-828. doi: 10.1111/papr.12951. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Model Shows Superiority of Wireless Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation Without a Separate Trial.成本效益模型显示,无需单独试验即可进行无线脊髓刺激植入术具有优越性。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):596-603. doi: 10.1111/ner.13102. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
8
Correction to: Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.对《脊髓刺激治疗神经性起源慢性疼痛患者的筛查试验是否具有临床实用性和成本效益?(TRIAL-STIM研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案》的勘误
Trials. 2019 Oct 28;20(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3804-7.
9
Redefining Spinal Cord Stimulation "Trials": A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Single-Stage Wireless Permanent Implantable Devices.重新定义脊髓刺激“试验”:使用单阶段无线永久植入式装置的随机对照试验。
Neuromodulation. 2020 Jan;23(1):96-101. doi: 10.1111/ner.12970. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
10
Trial Versus No Trial of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: Cost Analysis in United Kingdom National Health Service.脊髓刺激治疗慢性神经性疼痛:英国国家医疗服务体系中的成本分析——试验与非试验对比
Neuromodulation. 2019 Feb;22(2):208-214. doi: 10.1111/ner.12898. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
脊髓刺激治疗顽固性心绞痛的有效性和成本效益(RASCAL研究):一项先导性随机对照试验
Neuromodulation. 2016 Jan;19(1):60-70. doi: 10.1111/ner.12349. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: The SENZA-RCT Randomized Controlled Trial.新型10千赫兹高频疗法(HF10疗法)在治疗慢性腰腿痛方面优于传统低频脊髓刺激:SENZA-RCT随机对照试验
Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):851-60. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000774.
5
Spinal cord stimulation and pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a prospective two-center randomized controlled trial.脊髓刺激和疼痛缓解在糖尿病性周围神经痛中的作用:一项前瞻性双中心随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Nov;37(11):3016-24. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0684. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
6
The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee.脊髓和周围神经系统神经刺激在慢性疼痛和缺血性疾病治疗中的合理应用:神经调节适宜性共识委员会
Neuromodulation. 2014 Aug;17(6):515-50; discussion 550. doi: 10.1111/ner.12208.
7
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛的有效性和成本效益(RASCAL 研究):一项先导随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Feb 22;14:57. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-57.
8
A prospective, open-label, multicenter study to assess the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation and identify patients who would benefit.一项前瞻性、开放标签、多中心研究,旨在评估脊髓刺激的疗效,并确定哪些患者将从中受益。
Neuromodulation. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):7-11; discussion 12. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00411.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
9
Successful long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation despite limited pain relief during temporary trialing.尽管临时测试期间疼痛缓解有限,但脊髓刺激仍取得了成功的长期效果。
Neuromodulation. 2008 Jan;11(1):66-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00145.x.
10
Acute vs. Prolonged Screening for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain.急性与慢性疼痛脊髓刺激的延长筛查。
Neuromodulation. 2003 Jan;6(1):15-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2003.03002.x.