Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Center for Medical Decision Making, Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Crit Care. 2018 Nov 16;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4.
We aimed to investigate the extent of the agreement on practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation.
Investigators from 67 Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study centers completed several questionnaires (response rate: 99%).
Regarding practices around brain death, we found agreement on the clinical evaluation (prerequisites and neurological assessment) for brain death determination (BDD) in 100% of the centers. However, ancillary tests were required for BDD in 64% of the centers. BDD for nondonor patients was deemed mandatory in 18% of the centers before withdrawing life-sustaining measures (LSM). Also, practices around postmortem organ donation varied. Organ donation after circulatory arrest was forbidden in 45% of the centers. When withdrawal of LSM was contemplated, in 67% of centers the patients with a ventricular drain in situ had this removed, either sometimes or all of the time.
This study showed both agreement and some regional differences regarding practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. We hope our results help quantify and understand potential differences, and provide impetus for current dialogs toward further harmonization of practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation.
我们旨在调查关于脑死亡和死后器官捐献实践方面的一致性程度。
来自 67 个欧洲合作颅脑创伤效应研究中心(CENTER-TBI)的研究人员完成了多项调查问卷(应答率:99%)。
关于脑死亡方面的实践,我们发现 100%的中心都同意脑死亡诊断(BDD)的临床评估(先决条件和神经评估)。然而,64%的中心需要辅助检查来进行 BDD。在停止生命维持措施(LSM)之前,18%的中心认为对于非捐献者患者必须进行 BDD。此外,死后器官捐献的实践也存在差异。45%的中心禁止循环停止后的器官捐献。当考虑停止 LSM 时,67%的中心会移除原位脑室引流管,有时或一直都移除。
这项研究表明,在脑死亡和死后器官捐献方面的实践既存在一致性,也存在一些区域性差异。我们希望我们的研究结果能够量化和理解潜在的差异,并为当前关于脑死亡和死后器官捐献实践的进一步协调对话提供动力。