College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science, Shenzhen, 518060, China; Center for Language and Brain, Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science, Shenzhen, 518060, China; Center for Language and Brain, Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen, 518057, China; Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Jan;135:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
The conceptual properties of a conditional stimulus could contribute to human fear generalization, but how typicality influences fear generalization involving different conceptual hierarchies remains unclear. This study used event-related potential technology to investigate this in four categories of generalized stimulus (GS). We divided the GS into four categories: inferior typical members of conditioned stimulus (CS+) (TCS+), inferior atypical members of CS+ (ATCS+), inferior typical members of CS- (TCS-), and inferior atypical members of CS- (ATCS-). The CS+ groups elicited a larger P2 versus the CS- groups suggesting that aversive stimuli can automatically capture attention with timely avoidance of danger. Stimulus type (CS+; CS-) and typicality (typical; atypical) showed an interaction with N400. The elicited N400 was larger for atypical than typical members in CS- groups, but not in CS+ groups. Fear emotion elicited by CS+ may feature restrained semantic networks, dissipating typicality effects. Separate processing stages may modulate category-based fear generalization, with P2 representing first-stage low-level perceptual processing, and N400 second-stage high-level cognitive processing.
条件刺激的概念属性可能有助于人类恐惧泛化,但典型性如何影响涉及不同概念层次的恐惧泛化尚不清楚。本研究使用事件相关电位技术(ERP)技术在四个广义刺激(GS)类别中对此进行了研究。我们将 GS 分为四类:条件刺激(CS+)的下典型成员(TCS+)、CS+的下非典型成员(ATCS+)、CS-的下典型成员(TCS-)和 CS-的下非典型成员(ATCS-)。CS+组诱发的 P2 大于 CS-组,表明厌恶刺激可以自动吸引注意力,并及时避免危险。刺激类型(CS+;CS-)和典型性(典型;非典型)与 N400 呈交互作用。CS-组中,非典型成员诱发的 N400 大于典型成员,但 CS+组中没有。CS+引起的恐惧情绪可能具有受限的语义网络,从而消除典型性效应。基于类别恐惧泛化可能由不同的加工阶段来调节,P2 代表第一阶段的低水平感知加工,而 N400 代表第二阶段的高水平认知加工。