Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2292-5. Epub 2010 May 29.
The typicality effect describes a phenomenon whereby a typical item is easier to be judged as a member of a category than are atypical items. This effect has been intensively studied in the context of category verification tasks. The present study further investigated the typicality effect using our newly developed category-based deductive reasoning task. Subjects were required to judge whether an incoming stimulus had the properties described in the premise presented before. The stimuli were either typical or atypical members of four target semantic categories or were non-target stimuli. According to the ERP results, three phases were needed to determine whether the object has the property associated with the category in the premise. First, significant amplitude differences were seen between typical and atypical items at N1, which suggested that attention processing was influenced by the expectation in this up-to-down (deductive) process. The premise automatically induced the expectation of the prototype of one concept, i.e. the expectation for the prototype of birds was induced when the premise was "Birds possess the property C". Typical items (e.g., sparrow) were more similar to the prototype; hence, they were easier to be matched with the prototype induced by the premise than were atypical items (e.g., ostrich). Additionally, there was a dissociation between typical and atypical items at P2, which suggested that the participants' early detection of an item's category membership was influenced by the typicality. Thirdly, N400 effect is related to the process of semantic processes and determining whether the object has the property associated with the category in the premise. N400 mean amplitudes during the 300-500 ms epoch were significantly greater for non-target members than for target members, while words of lower typicality (atypical) evoked greater N400 amplitudes during the 350-450 ms epoch than did words of higher typicality (typical).
典型性效应描述了一种现象,即典型项目比非典型项目更容易被判断为某个类别中的成员。这种效应在类别验证任务的背景下得到了深入研究。本研究进一步使用我们新开发的基于类别演绎推理任务来研究典型性效应。要求受试者判断传入刺激是否具有前提中呈现的属性。刺激物要么是四个目标语义类别中的典型或非典型成员,要么是非目标刺激。根据 ERP 结果,需要三个阶段来确定对象是否具有前提中与类别相关的属性。首先,在 N1 时,典型项目和非典型项目之间存在明显的振幅差异,这表明在这个自上而下(演绎)的过程中,注意力处理受到期望的影响。前提自动诱导与前提中的概念原型相关的期望,即当前提为“鸟类具有属性 C”时,会诱导鸟类的原型期望。典型项目(例如麻雀)与原型更相似;因此,与非典型项目(例如鸵鸟)相比,它们更容易与前提诱导的原型匹配。此外,在 P2 时,典型项目和非典型项目之间存在分离,这表明参与者对项目类别成员的早期检测受到典型性的影响。第三,N400 效应与语义过程和确定对象是否具有前提中与类别相关的属性的过程有关。在 300-500 毫秒的时间窗口内,非目标成员的 N400 平均振幅明显大于目标成员,而低典型性(非典型)的词在 350-450 毫秒的时间窗口内诱发的 N400 振幅大于高典型性(典型)的词。