Suppr超能文献

基于极坐标图的深度卷积神经网络特征的心脏结节病分类。

Cardiac sarcoidosis classification with deep convolutional neural network-based features using polar maps.

机构信息

Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, 060-0814, Japan.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2019 Jan;104:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine whether deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based features can represent the difference between cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and non-CS using polar maps.

METHODS

A total of 85 patients (33 CS patients and 52 non-CS patients) were analyzed as our study subjects. One radiologist reviewed PET/CT images and defined the left ventricle region for the construction of polar maps. We extracted high-level features from the polar maps through the Inception-v3 network and evaluated their effectiveness by applying them to a CS classification task. Then we introduced the ReliefF algorithm in our method. The standardized uptake value (SUV)-based classification method and the coefficient of variance (CoV)-based classification method were used as comparative methods.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity and the harmonic mean of sensitivity and specificity of our method with the ReliefF algorithm were 0.839, 0.870 and 0.854, respectively. Those of the SUVmax-based classification method were 0.468, 0.710 and 0.564, respectively, and those of the CoV-based classification method were 0.655, 0.750 and 0.699, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The DCNN-based high-level features may be more effective than low-level features used in conventional quantitative analysis methods for CS classification.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过极地图确定基于深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)的特征是否可以代表心脏结节病(CS)和非 CS 之间的差异。

方法

共分析了 85 例患者(33 例 CS 患者和 52 例非 CS 患者)作为研究对象。一位放射科医生回顾了 PET/CT 图像,并为极地图的构建定义了左心室区域。我们通过 Inception-v3 网络从极地图中提取高级特征,并将其应用于 CS 分类任务来评估其有效性。然后,我们在方法中引入了 ReliefF 算法。标准化摄取值(SUV)分类法和变异系数(CoV)分类法被用作比较方法。

结果

我们的方法结合 ReliefF 算法的敏感性、特异性和敏感性与特异性的调和平均值分别为 0.839、0.870 和 0.854。SUVmax 分类法的敏感性、特异性和调和平均值分别为 0.468、0.710 和 0.564,CoV 分类法的敏感性、特异性和调和平均值分别为 0.655、0.750 和 0.699。

结论

与传统定量分析方法中使用的低水平特征相比,基于 DCNN 的高级特征可能更有效地用于 CS 分类。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验