Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Am J Med Sci. 2018 Dec;356(6):518-527. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
Glycated hemoglobin A (A1C) levels have traditionally been the gold standard for assessing glycemic control and treatment efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, A1C does not take into account fluctuations in blood glucose levels known as glycemic variability (GV). In recent years, GV has become increasingly clinically relevant, because of a better understanding of the need to reach target A1C while avoiding hypoglycemia. GV relates to both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and has been associated with poorer quality of life. Diabetes treatments targeting multiple pathophysiological mechanisms are most beneficial in controlling A1C and reducing GV. In clinical trials, a number of metrics are used to measure GV, many of which are not well understood in the clinical practice. Until a gold standard metric for GV is established, the variety of measurements available may confound the choice of an optimal treatment for an individual patient.
糖化血红蛋白 A(A1C)水平一直是评估 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和治疗效果的金标准。然而,A1C 并未考虑到血糖水平的波动,即血糖变异性(GV)。近年来,由于人们对在避免低血糖的同时达到目标 A1C 的必要性有了更好的理解,GV 变得越来越具有临床意义。GV 与高血糖和低血糖都有关,并且与生活质量较差有关。针对多种病理生理机制的糖尿病治疗方法最有益于控制 A1C 和降低 GV。在临床试验中,使用了许多指标来测量 GV,其中许多在临床实践中尚未得到很好的理解。在确立 GV 的黄金标准指标之前,各种可用的测量方法可能会使为个体患者选择最佳治疗方案变得复杂。