1 UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
2 UNC Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 May;53(5):471-477. doi: 10.1177/1060028018815064. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
Despite widespread recognition of the need for innovative pharmacy practice approaches, the development and implementation of value-based outcomes remains difficult to achieve. Furthermore, gaps in the literature persist because the majority of available literature is retrospective in nature and describes only the clinical impact of pharmacists' interventions.
Length of stay (LOS) is a clinical outcome metric used to represent efficiency in health care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-driven interventions on LOS in the acute care setting.
A separate samples pretest-posttest design was utilized to compare the effect of pharmacist interventions across 3 practice areas (medicine, hematology/oncology, and pediatrics). Two time periods were evaluated: preimplementation (PRE) and a pilot period, postimplementation of interventions (POST). Interventions included targeted discharge services, such as discharge prescription writing (with provider cosignature). Participating pharmacists completed semistructured interviews following the pilot.
A total of 924 patients (466 PRE and 458 POST) were included in the analysis. The median LOS decreased from 4.95 (interquartile range = 3.24-8.5) to 4.12 (2.21-7.96) days from the PRE versus POST groups, respectively ( P < 0.011). There was no difference in readmission rates between groups (21% vs 19.1%, P = 0.7). Interviews revealed several themes, including positive impact on professional development. Conclusion and Relevance: This pilot study demonstrated the ability of pharmacist interventions to reduce LOS. Pharmacists identified time as the primary barrier and acknowledged the importance of leaders prioritizing pharmacists' responsibilities. This study is novel in targeting LOS, providing a value-based outcome for clinical pharmacy services.
尽管人们普遍认识到需要创新的药学实践方法,但仍然难以实现基于价值的结果的开发和实施。此外,文献中仍然存在差距,因为大多数可用文献是回顾性的,仅描述了药师干预的临床影响。
住院时间(LOS)是一种用于表示医疗保健效率的临床结果指标。本研究的目的是评估药师驱动的干预措施对急性护理环境中 LOS 的影响。
采用单独样本预测试后测试设计,比较 3 个实践领域(内科、血液/肿瘤学和儿科)中药师干预的效果。评估了两个时间段:实施前(PRE)和干预实施后的试点期(POST)。干预措施包括有针对性的出院服务,例如出院处方书写(有提供者共同签名)。试点后,参与的药剂师完成了半结构化访谈。
共纳入 924 名患者(466 名 PRE 和 458 名 POST)进行分析。与 PRE 组相比,POST 组的 LOS 中位数从 4.95(四分位距=3.24-8.5)降至 4.12(2.21-7.96)天(P<0.011)。两组之间的再入院率没有差异(21%比 19.1%,P=0.7)。访谈揭示了几个主题,包括对专业发展的积极影响。结论和相关性:这项试点研究表明,药师干预能够缩短 LOS。药剂师认为时间是主要障碍,并认识到领导层优先考虑药剂师的职责的重要性。本研究的新颖之处在于针对 LOS,为临床药学服务提供了基于价值的结果。