• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于药师主导的消化性溃疡疾病管理干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis on pharmacist-led interventions for the management of peptic ulcer disease.

作者信息

Sapkota Biswash, Pandey Bipindra, Sapkota Bishal, Dhakal Keshav, Aryal Bijay

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Madan Bhandari Academy of Health Sciences, Hetauda, Nepal.

Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320181. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320181
PMID:40132025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11936246/
Abstract

Pharmacists are essential for developing pharmacotherapy plans, conducting clinical assessments, and overseeing drug monitoring. Their interventions help prevent medication errors and adverse drug events and enhance medication safety. This study aimed to systematically review pharmacist-led interventions for managing medication-related issues in patients receiving anti-ulcer treatments. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to explore four databases for studies published from 1904 up to June 2024. Nine studies were reviewed, including four retrospective, three case-control, one mixed-method, and one prospective pre-post study involving 34,099 participants. The average age of the patients was 61 years, and 50.23% were male. The study quality was high, with an average score of 6.22/7 on the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. All studies involved direct interactions between pharmacists and patients or physicians, and data were primarily collected from hospital electronic records. Pooled analysis demonstrated that pharmacist interventions significantly improved the rational use of anti-ulcer medications (OR: 4.5; 95% CI: 0.97 to 20.80; I2 =  89%, P =  0.05), as reported by studies. Pharmacist interventions have a significant impact on improving rational drug use, reducing costs and treatment duration, and enhancing appropriate medication use. These interventions also positively influenced medication adherence and the correction of irrational drug use.

摘要

药剂师对于制定药物治疗方案、进行临床评估以及监督药物监测至关重要。他们的干预有助于预防用药错误和药物不良事件,并提高用药安全性。本研究旨在系统评价药剂师主导的干预措施对接受抗溃疡治疗患者的药物相关问题的管理效果。进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以检索1904年至2024年6月发表的研究的四个数据库。共审查了9项研究,包括4项回顾性研究、3项病例对照研究、1项混合方法研究和1项前瞻性前后对照研究,涉及34099名参与者。患者的平均年龄为61岁,男性占50.23%。研究质量较高,在改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表上的平均得分为6.22/7。所有研究都涉及药剂师与患者或医生之间的直接互动,数据主要从医院电子记录中收集。汇总分析表明,如研究报告所述,药剂师的干预显著改善了抗溃疡药物的合理使用(比值比:4.5;95%置信区间:0.97至20.80;I2 = 89%,P = 0.05)。药剂师的干预对改善合理用药、降低成本和缩短治疗时间以及提高用药合理性有显著影响。这些干预还对用药依从性和纠正不合理用药产生了积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/f28dcb1d96e0/pone.0320181.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/11b4c6449628/pone.0320181.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/df699bae9873/pone.0320181.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/bd6b6aefd12b/pone.0320181.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/f28dcb1d96e0/pone.0320181.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/11b4c6449628/pone.0320181.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/df699bae9873/pone.0320181.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/bd6b6aefd12b/pone.0320181.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8361/11936246/f28dcb1d96e0/pone.0320181.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis on pharmacist-led interventions for the management of peptic ulcer disease.关于药师主导的消化性溃疡疾病管理干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320181. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of pharmacist-led interventions on medication-related problems among patients treated for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.药师主导的干预措施对癌症治疗患者药物相关问题的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 May;20(5):487-497. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Effect of pharmacist intervention on improving antidepressant medication adherence and depression symptomology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药师干预对改善抗抑郁药依从性和抑郁症状的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Apr;14(4):321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
Pharmacist-led interventions to reduce unplanned admissions for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.药剂师主导的干预措施以减少老年人非计划性入院:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2014 Mar;43(2):174-87. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft169. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
7
Evaluation of prescriber responses to pharmacist recommendations communicated by fax in a medication therapy management program (MTMP).在药物治疗管理项目(MTMP)中,评估处方医生对通过传真传达的药剂师建议的反应。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jun;17(5):345-54. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.5.345.
8
9
Pharmacist-led interventions to improve medication adherence in older adults: A meta-analysis.药师主导的干预措施以提高老年人的药物依从性:一项荟萃分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Nov;69(11):3301-3311. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17373. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Impact of pharmacist-delivered interventions on pain-related outcomes: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.药剂师实施干预对疼痛相关结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状综述。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Jun;20(6):34-51. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Correction: Pharmacist-led educational interventions provided to healthcare providers to reduce medication errors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.更正:为减少用药错误而向医疗服务提供者提供的由药剂师主导的教育干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0294195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294195. eCollection 2023.
2
Telephone follow-up by clinical pharmacists can improve treatment outcomes in patients with peptic ulcers: A prospective randomized study.临床药师电话随访可改善消化性溃疡患者的治疗结局:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 21;101(42):e31150. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031150.
3
Interventions and Impact of Pharmacist-Delivered Services for People Infected with COVID-19: A Systematic Review.
药剂师为新冠病毒感染者提供服务的干预措施及影响:一项系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;10(9):1630. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091630.
4
Drug-related problems among hospitalized hypertensive and heart failure patients and physician acceptance of pharmacists' interventions at a teaching hospital in Ghana.加纳一家教学医院中住院高血压和心力衰竭患者的药物相关问题以及医生对药剂师干预措施的接受情况。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 24;5(5):e786. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.786. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Characteristics of Pharmacists' Interventions Related to Proton-Pump Inhibitors in French Hospitals: An Observational Study.法国医院中与质子泵抑制剂相关的药师干预特征:一项观察性研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 28;2022:9619699. doi: 10.1155/2022/9619699. eCollection 2022.
6
Clinical Intervention Increases Rational Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the General Surgery Department.临床干预提高了普通外科质子泵抑制剂的合理使用。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 25;13:864081. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.864081. eCollection 2022.
7
The clinician's guide to p values, confidence intervals, and magnitude of effects.临床医生关于P值、置信区间和效应大小的指南。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Feb;36(2):341-342. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01863-w. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
8
Feasibility of a pharmacy-led intervention to de-implement non-guideline-concordant proton pump inhibitor use.由药房主导的干预措施以减少不符合指南的质子泵抑制剂使用的可行性。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 1;2(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00161-6.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Effect of clinical pharmacist interventions on cost in an integrated health system specialty pharmacy.临床药师干预对综合卫生系统专科药房成本的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):379-384. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.379.