Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool , Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South , Liverpool , UK .
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Nov;23(11):1510-1516. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1503998. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
Little research examines trajectories of carer resilience or the factors that facilitate or hinder resilience over time. We use qualitative longitudinal methods to examine trajectories of resilience and which assets and resources are associated with resilience and care status transitions in spousal dementia carers. Based on an original sample of 23 spousal dementia carers (Donnellan, Bennett, & Soulsby, 2015 ), we conducted 13 follow-up interviews, including: 5 continuing home carers, 3 former carers (institutionalised), and 5 former carers (widowed). Five participants remained resilient (stable resilient), three remained non-resilient (stable non-resilient) and four participants became resilient (non-resilient to resilient). Only one participant became non-resilient (resilient to non-resilient). Stable resilience was characterised by continuing individual assets and community resources. Carers who became resilient returned to previous resources, or gained new resources. Institutionalisation and widowhood are not always barriers to resilience; spousal dementia carers can remain or even become resilient over time despite deteriorating health, institutionalisation, or death of the care recipient.
鲜有研究考察照顾者韧性的轨迹,或随时间推移促进或阻碍韧性的因素。我们采用定性纵向方法,考察配偶型痴呆症照顾者韧性的轨迹,以及与韧性和照顾状况转变相关的资产和资源。基于最初的 23 名配偶型痴呆症照顾者样本(Donnellan、Bennett 和 Soulsby,2015),我们进行了 13 次随访访谈,包括:5 名继续居家照顾者、3 名前照顾者(机构化)和 5 名前照顾者(丧偶)。5 名参与者保持韧性(稳定的韧性),3 名参与者保持非韧性(稳定的非韧性),4 名参与者变得有韧性(非韧性到有韧性)。只有 1 名参与者变得非韧性(韧性到非韧性)。稳定的韧性以持续的个人资产和社区资源为特征。变得有韧性的照顾者会重新获得以前的资源,或获得新的资源。机构化和丧偶并不总是韧性的障碍;尽管照顾对象的健康状况恶化、机构化或死亡,配偶型痴呆症照顾者仍能随着时间的推移保持或甚至变得有韧性。