Lorente Rafael, Lorente Alejandro, Palacios Pablo, Barrios Carlos, Rosa Bárbara, Vaccaro Alexander
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Ramón y Cajal.
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Mar;32(2):E117-E125. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000737.
This is a prospective study of 2 cohorts.
Compare the clinical and radiologic outcome of 2 cohorts of unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures treated by open posterior fixation (OPF) with bone graft or by percutaneous fixation (PCF) without grafting.
In recent years, PCF is the most common treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. To date, no studies have analyzed clinical outcomes in terms of return to work.
Two cohorts of patients with unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures fractures (type A2, A3, and A4) without neurological symptoms underwent OPF (n=91) or PCF (n=54) between 2010 and 2015. A conventional radiologic study was performed in the preoperative, immediate postoperative period, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. The period to return to work and the type of work were also recorded.
The percentages of correction were significantly higher in cases operated by OPF: fracture angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), vertebral compression (P<0.001), and displacement (P<0.001). Cases operated by PCF experienced greater loss of correction at 2-year follow-up, especially in fracture displacement (P<0.001), deformity angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), and in the sagittal index (P<0.001). Besides this greater loss of correction, PCF cases showed better Visual Analog Scale (P<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (P<0.001) at final follow-up. The percentage of patients returning to the same heavy work position was higher in the PCF group (P<0.001) and in a shorter period of time (P<0.001).
The greater loss of correction of patients undergoing PCF does not reflect the clinical outcomes that were significantly better as compared to patients undergoing open fixation with grafting. It would be useful to further evaluate if the radiological changes could have a long-term clinical significance.
这是一项对两个队列的前瞻性研究。
比较两组不稳定型胸腰椎和腰椎骨折患者,一组采用后路切开内固定(OPF)并植骨治疗,另一组采用经皮固定(PCF)且不植骨治疗后的临床和影像学结果。
近年来,PCF是胸腰椎骨折最常见的治疗方法。迄今为止,尚无研究从恢复工作的角度分析临床结果。
2010年至2015年间,两组无神经症状的不稳定型胸腰椎和腰椎骨折(A2、A3和A4型)患者分别接受了OPF(n = 91)或PCF(n = 54)治疗。在术前、术后即刻、1年和2年随访时进行了常规影像学检查。在1年和2年随访时,通过视觉模拟评分法和Oswestry功能障碍指数评分评估临床结果。还记录了恢复工作的时间和工作类型。
OPF手术病例的矫正百分比显著更高:骨折角度(P < 0.001)、后凸畸形(P < 0.001)、椎体压缩(P < 0.001)和移位(P < 0.001)。PCF手术病例在2年随访时矫正丢失更多,尤其是在骨折移位(P < 0.001)、畸形角度(P < 0.001)、后凸畸形(P < 0.001)和矢状指数(P < 0.001)方面。除了矫正丢失更多外,PCF病例在最终随访时视觉模拟评分(P < 0.001)和Oswestry功能障碍指数评分(P < 0.001)更好。PCF组恢复到相同繁重工作岗位的患者百分比更高(P < 0.001),且时间更短(P < 0.001)。
接受PCF治疗的患者矫正丢失更多,但与接受切开植骨内固定治疗的患者相比,其临床结果并未显著更差。进一步评估影像学变化是否具有长期临床意义将是有益的。