Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University Hospital, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Department of Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 Mar;43(3):335-346. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1471. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
Vitamin C, an enzyme cofactor and antioxidant, could hasten the resolution of inflammation, oxidative stress, and microvascular dysfunction. While observational studies have demonstrated that critical illness is associated with low levels of vitamin C, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of vitamin C, alone or in combination with other antioxidants, have yielded contradicting results. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to December 2017) for RCTs comparing vitamin C, by enteral or parenteral routes, with placebo or none, in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Two independent reviewers assessed study eligibility without language restrictions and abstracted data. Overall mortality was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes were incident infections, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). We prespecified 5 subgroups hypothesized to benefit more from vitamin C. Eleven randomized trials were included. When 9 RCTs (n = 1322) reporting mortality were pooled, vitamin C was not associated with reduced risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-1.20, P = .21). No effect was found on infections, ICU or hospital LOS, or duration of MV. In multiple subgroup comparison, no statistically significant subgroup effects were observed. However, we did observe a tendency towards a mortality reduction (RR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.04-1.05; P = .06) when intravenous high-dose vitamin C monotherapy was administered. Current evidence does not support supplementing critically ill patients with vitamin C. A moderately large treatment effect may exist, but further studies, particularly of monotherapy administration, are warranted.
维生素 C 作为一种酶辅助因子和抗氧化剂,可以加速炎症、氧化应激和微血管功能障碍的消退。虽然观察性研究表明,危重病与维生素 C 水平低有关,但单独使用维生素 C 或与其他抗氧化剂联合使用的随机对照试验 (RCT) 得出了相互矛盾的结果。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(从建库到 2017 年 12 月),以确定比较肠内或肠外途径给予维生素 C 与安慰剂或不给予维生素 C 的 RCT,纳入 ICU 患者。两名独立的审查员评估了研究的合格性,且无语言限制和提取数据。总体死亡率是主要结局;次要结局是感染发生率、ICU 住院时间 (LOS)、医院 LOS 和机械通气 (MV) 持续时间。我们预先设定了 5 个亚组,假设这些亚组能从维生素 C 中获益更多。共纳入 11 项随机试验。当汇总了 9 项 RCT(n = 1322)报告的死亡率时,维生素 C 与降低死亡率风险无关(风险比 [RR] 0.72,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.43-1.20,P =.21)。维生素 C 对感染、ICU 或医院 LOS 或 MV 持续时间没有影响。在多项亚组比较中,未观察到统计学上显著的亚组效应。然而,当给予静脉内高剂量维生素 C 单药治疗时,我们确实观察到死亡率降低的趋势(RR 0.21;95% CI:0.04-1.05;P =.06)。目前的证据不支持补充危重病患者的维生素 C。可能存在适度的治疗效果,但需要进一步的研究,特别是单药治疗的研究。