Suppr超能文献

复诊几率:一项运用医疗服务提供者评估来预测患者短期急诊复诊情况的前瞻性研究。

Odds of return: a prospective study using provider assessment to predict short-term patient return visits to the emergency department.

作者信息

Fruhan Scott, Bills Corey B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):e053918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053918.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have assessed patient-level characteristics associated with emergency department (ED) return visits, but none have used provider assessment. We prospectively investigate whether clinical providers could accurately predict ED return visits.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single academically affiliated urban county hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Discharged ED patients over a 14-month period with a provider assessment of the likelihood of patient return within 7 days of ED discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome of interest was a return visit to the ED within 7 days. Additional outcome measures included a return visit within 72 hours and a return visit resulting in admission. We also measured the accuracy of provider gestalt, and provide measures of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios.

RESULTS

Of the 11 922 ED discharges included in this study, providers expected 2116 (17.7%) to result in a return visit within 7 days. Providers were much more likely to perceive a return visit if the patient left against medical advice (OR: 5.97, 95% CI: 4.67 to 7.62), or was homeless (OR: 5.69, 95% CI: 5.14 to 6.29). Patients who actually returned were also more likely to be homeless, English speaking and to have left the ED against medical advice on the initial encounter. The strongest predictor of a return visit at both 72 hours and 7 days in multivariable modelling was provider assessment (OR: 3.77, 95% CI: 3.25 to 4.37; OR: 3.72, 95% CI: 3.29 to 4.21, respectively). Overall sensitivity and specificity of provider gestalt as a measure of patient return within 7 days were 47% and 87%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.51 and 0.61, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinician assessment was the strongest predictor of a return visit in this dataset. Clinician assessment may be used as a way to screen patients during the index visit and enrol them in efforts to decrease return visits.

摘要

目的

既往研究评估了与急诊科复诊相关的患者层面特征,但均未采用医护人员评估。我们前瞻性地调查临床医护人员能否准确预测急诊科复诊情况。

方法

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

一家隶属于学术机构的城市县级医院。

参与者

在14个月期间内从急诊科出院的患者,并由医护人员评估其在急诊科出院后7天内复诊的可能性。

主要结局指标

主要关注的结局是在7天内返回急诊科复诊。其他结局指标包括在72小时内复诊以及复诊后入院。我们还测量了医护人员总体印象的准确性,并提供了敏感性、特异性、预测值和似然比的测量结果。

结果

本研究纳入的11922例急诊科出院患者中,医护人员预计有2116例(17.7%)会在7天内复诊。如果患者拒绝医嘱出院(比值比:5.97,95%置信区间:4.67至7.62)或无家可归(比值比:5.69,95%置信区间:5.14至6.29),医护人员更有可能认为患者会复诊。实际复诊的患者也更有可能无家可归、说英语且在初次就诊时拒绝医嘱出院。在多变量模型中,72小时和7天时复诊的最强预测因素是医护人员评估(比值比分别为:3.77,95%置信区间:3.25至4.37;3.72,95%置信区间:3.29至4.21)。作为7天内患者复诊指标的医护人员总体印象的总体敏感性和特异性分别为47%和87%。阳性和阴性似然比分别为3.51和0.61。

结论

在该数据集中,临床医生评估是复诊的最强预测因素。临床医生评估可作为在首次就诊时筛选患者的一种方法,并让他们参与减少复诊的工作。

相似文献

3
Attending-Provider Handoffs and Pediatric Emergency Department Revisits.主治医生交接和儿科急诊复诊
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Nov 1;37(11):e679-e685. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001983.
10
The recidivism characteristics of an emergency department observation unit.急诊科观察单元的累犯特征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

4
Assessing Risk of Future Suicidality in Emergency Department Patients.评估急诊科患者未来自杀风险。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;26(4):376-383. doi: 10.1111/acem.13562. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Patient Characteristics and Differences in Hospital Readmission Rates.患者特征及再入院率差异
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1803-12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4660.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验