China National Health Development Research Institute, No. 38, Xueyuan Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100089, China.
Institute of Development Studies, Library Road, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK.
Global Health. 2018 Nov 20;14(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0429-7.
Healthcare systems are increasingly recognised as complex, in which a range of non-linear and emergent behaviours occur. China's healthcare system is no exception. The hugeness of China, and the variation in conditions in different jurisdictions present very substantial challenges to reformers, and militate against adopting one-size-fits-all policy solutions. As a consequence, approaches to change management in China have frequently emphasised the importance of sub-national experimentation, innovation, and learning. Multiple mechanisms exist within the government structure to allow and encourage flexible implementation of policies, and tailoring of reforms to context. These limit the risk of large-scale policy failures and play a role in exploring new reform directions and potentially systemically-useful practices. They have helped in managing the huge transition that China has undergone from the 1970s onwards. China has historically made use of a number of mechanisms to encourage learning from innovative and emergent policy practices. Policy evaluation is increasingly becoming a tool used to probe emergent practices and inform iterative policy making/refining. This paper examines the case of a central policy research institute whose mandate includes evaluating reforms and providing feedback to the health ministry. Evaluation approaches being used are evolving as Chinese research agencies become increasingly professionalised, and in response to the increasing complexity of reforms. The paper argues that learning from widespread innovation and experimentation is challenging, but necessary for stewardship of large, and rapidly-changing systems.
医疗保健系统被越来越多地认为是复杂的,其中会出现一系列非线性和突发的行为。中国的医疗保健系统也不例外。中国地域广阔,不同司法管辖区的条件差异很大,这给改革者带来了巨大的挑战,也不利于采取一刀切的政策解决方案。因此,中国的变革管理方法经常强调国家以下层面的实验、创新和学习的重要性。政府结构内部存在多种机制,可以允许和鼓励灵活执行政策,并根据具体情况调整改革。这些机制限制了大规模政策失败的风险,并在探索新的改革方向和潜在的系统有用的实践方面发挥了作用。这些机制有助于管理中国从 20 世纪 70 年代以来所经历的巨大转型。中国历史上曾利用多种机制鼓励从创新和突发的政策实践中学习。政策评估越来越成为一种用于探究突发实践并为迭代政策制定/改进提供信息的工具。本文考察了一个中央政策研究机构的案例,该机构的任务包括评估改革并向卫生部提供反馈。随着中国研究机构日益专业化,以及改革的日益复杂性,所采用的评估方法也在不断演变。本文认为,从广泛的创新和实验中学习具有挑战性,但对于管理大型、快速变化的系统是必要的。