Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病成人高强度运动后高血糖的最佳胰岛素校正因子:FIT 研究。

Optimal Insulin Correction Factor in Post-High-Intensity Exercise Hyperglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The FIT Study.

机构信息

LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(1):10-16. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1475. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Postexercise hyperglycemia, following high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), is largely underrecognized by the clinical community and generally undertreated. The aim of this study was to compare four multipliers of an individual's insulin correction factor (ICF) to treat post-HIIT hyperglycemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The FIT study had a randomized, crossover design in physically active subjects with T1D (mean ± SD age 34.9 ± 10.1 years, BMI 25.5 ± 2.5 kg/m, and HbA 7.2 ± 0.9%) using multiple daily injections. Following an 8-week optimization period, with 300 units/mL insulin glargine used as the basal insulin, subjects performed four weekly sessions of 25 min of HIIT. If hyperglycemia (>8.0 mmol/L) resulted, subjects received a bolus insulin correction 15 min post-HIIT, based on their own ICF, adjusted by one of four multipliers: 0, 50, 100, or 150%.

RESULTS

Seventeen subjects completed 71 exercise trials, of which 64 (90%) resulted in hyperglycemia. At 40 min postexercise, plasma glucose (PG) increased from mean ± SD 8.8 ± 1.0 mmol/L at baseline to 12.7 ± 2.4 mmol/L (increase of 3.8 ± 1.5 mmol/L). After correction, adjusted mean ± SE PG was significantly reduced for the 50% (-2.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L, < 0.01), 100% (-4.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L, < 0.001), and 150% (-5.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L, < 0.001) arms but had increased further in the 0% correction arm. Both the 100 and 150% corrections were more effective than the 50% correction ( < 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively) but were not different from each other. Hypoglycemia was rare.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-HIIT hyperglycemia, correction based on a patient's usual ICF is safe and effective. Optimal PG reduction, with minimal hypoglycemia, occurred in the 100 and 150% correction arms.

摘要

目的

高强度间歇训练(HIIT)后,1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者会出现餐后高血糖,但这在临床实践中很大程度上未被认识到,且通常治疗不足。本研究旨在比较四种个体胰岛素校正因子(ICF)倍增剂治疗 HIIT 后高血糖的效果。

研究设计和方法

这项 FIT 研究采用随机交叉设计,纳入了活跃的 T1D 受试者(平均年龄 34.9 ± 10.1 岁,BMI 25.5 ± 2.5 kg/m²,HbA1c 7.2 ± 0.9%),他们使用多次每日注射胰岛素。在进行为期 8 周的优化期后,使用 300 U/mL 甘精胰岛素作为基础胰岛素,受试者每周进行 4 次 25 分钟的 HIIT。如果出现高血糖(>8.0 mmol/L),则在 HIIT 后 15 分钟,根据自身 ICF 并使用四种倍增因子(0、50、100 或 150%)中的一种对受试者进行胰岛素校正。

结果

17 名受试者完成了 71 次运动试验,其中 64 次(90%)导致高血糖。在运动后 40 分钟,血糖(PG)从基线时的平均 ± 标准差 8.8 ± 1.0 mmol/L 升高至 12.7 ± 2.4 mmol/L(升高 3.8 ± 1.5 mmol/L)。校正后,50%(-2.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L, < 0.01)、100%(-4.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L, < 0.001)和 150%(-5.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L, < 0.001)校正组的平均 ± SE PG 显著降低,但 0%校正组的 PG 进一步升高。100%和 150%的校正都比 50%的校正更有效(<0.01 和 <0.001),但彼此之间没有差异。低血糖很少见。

结论

在 HIIT 后高血糖中,基于患者通常的 ICF 进行校正既安全又有效。最小化低血糖的情况下,PG 降低最明显的是 100%和 150%的校正组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验