• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证黑色素瘤患者非前哨淋巴结阳性的列线图及其临床意义:一项巴西-荷兰研究。

Validation of a Nomogram for Non-sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma Patients, and Its Clinical Implications: A Brazilian-Dutch Study.

机构信息

Skin Cancer Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):395-405. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7038-9. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-018-7038-9
PMID:30456681
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-sentinel node (NSN) positivity impacts the prognosis of melanoma patients; however, the benefits of completion lymph node dissection in patients with positive sentinel nodes (SNs) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to present a predictive nomogram for NSN positivity in melanoma patients with a positive SN biopsy.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis from patients who underwent SN biopsy in a Brazilian institution from 2000 to 2015 was used for the construction and internal validation of the nomogram. This nomogram was then externally validated in a cohort of Dutch patients.

RESULTS

The Brazilian cohort comprised 1213 patients, with a mean follow-up of 5.11 years. Breslow thickness (odds ratio [OR] 1.170, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.043-1.314]; p = 0.008), number of positive SNs (OR 1.092, 95% CI 1.034-1.153; p = 0.001), and largest diameter of the metastatic deposit (OR 3.217, 95% CI 1.551-6.674; p = 0.002) were statistically significant for NSN positivity. Internal validation was performed using a bootstrapping technique. A good performance was observed (Brier score 0.097) and an excellent power of discrimination was achieved (area under the curve [AUC] 0.822). The nomogram was then applied to the Dutch cohort, and its overall performance (Brier score 0.085), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; p = 0.198), and discriminatory power (AUC 0.752, 95% CI 0.615-0.890) were all adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented a nomogram for assessing NSN probability that should not only be used for surgical considerations but also for risk stratification and clinical decisions. Internal validation has shown that this is an adequate model, while external validation increases the model's reliability and suggests that it can be globally incorporated.

摘要

背景

非前哨淋巴结(NSN)阳性会影响黑色素瘤患者的预后;然而,在前哨淋巴结(SN)阳性的患者中进行淋巴结清扫术的获益是有限的。

目的

我们旨在为 SN 活检阳性的黑色素瘤患者提出一个预测 NSN 阳性的预测列线图。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2000 年至 2015 年在巴西一家机构接受 SN 活检的患者,该研究用于构建和验证列线图。然后,在荷兰患者队列中对该列线图进行了外部验证。

结果

巴西队列包括 1213 例患者,平均随访 5.11 年。Breslow 厚度(比值比 [OR] 1.170,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.043-1.314;p=0.008)、阳性 SN 数量(OR 1.092,95%CI 1.034-1.153;p=0.001)和最大转移灶直径(OR 3.217,95%CI 1.551-6.674;p=0.002)对 NSN 阳性具有统计学意义。使用 bootstrap 技术进行了内部验证。观察到良好的性能(Brier 评分 0.097)和出色的区分能力(曲线下面积 [AUC] 0.822)。然后将该列线图应用于荷兰队列,其整体性能(Brier 评分 0.085)、校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验;p=0.198)和区分能力(AUC 0.752,95%CI 0.615-0.890)均令人满意。

结论

我们提出了一种用于评估 NSN 概率的列线图,不仅应用于手术考虑,还应用于风险分层和临床决策。内部验证表明这是一个合适的模型,而外部验证则提高了模型的可靠性,并表明它可以在全球范围内使用。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Nomogram for Non-sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma Patients, and Its Clinical Implications: A Brazilian-Dutch Study.验证黑色素瘤患者非前哨淋巴结阳性的列线图及其临床意义:一项巴西-荷兰研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):395-405. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7038-9. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
2
A prediction tool incorporating the biomarker S-100B for patient selection for completion lymph node dissection in stage III melanoma.一种纳入生物标志物S-100B的预测工具,用于III期黑色素瘤患者完全淋巴结清扫的患者选择。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;43(9):1753-1759. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
3
Assessment of a new scoring system for predicting non-sentinel node positivity in sentinel node-positive melanoma patients.评估一种新的评分系统,用于预测前哨淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤患者中的非前哨淋巴结阳性。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;39(2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
4
Prediction of Non-sentinel Node Status in Patients with Melanoma and Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy: An Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) Study.黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检阳性患者非前哨淋巴结状态的预测:意大利黑色素瘤研究组(IMI)研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):271-279. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6143-5. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
Performance of models predicting residual lymph node disease in melanoma patients following sentinel lymph node biopsy.预测黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结活检后残留淋巴结疾病的模型的性能。
Am J Surg. 2020 May;219(5):750-755. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.059. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
The predictive power of serum S-100B for non-sentinel node positivity in melanoma patients.血清S-100B对黑色素瘤患者非前哨淋巴结阳性的预测能力。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;42(4):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
Validation of a nomogram to predict the presence of sentinel lymph node metastases in melanoma.预测黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移情况的列线图的验证
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2874-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0077-x. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
8
Predicting sentinel node positivity in patients with melanoma: external validation of a risk-prediction calculator (the Melanoma Institute Australia nomogram) using a large European population-based patient cohort.预测黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性:使用大型欧洲基于人群的患者队列对风险预测计算器(澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所列线图)进行外部验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Aug;185(2):412-418. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19895. Epub 2021 May 9.
9
Metastatic area ratio can help predict nonsentinel node positivity in melanoma patients.转移面积比有助于预测黑色素瘤患者非前哨淋巴结的阳性情况。
Melanoma Res. 2016 Feb;26(1):42-5. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000202.
10
Factors predictive of tumor-positive nonsentinel lymph nodes after tumor-positive sentinel lymph node dissection for melanoma.黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移灶切除术后肿瘤阳性非前哨淋巴结的预测因素
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 15;22(18):3677-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-proportional hazards model with a PVF frailty term: application with a melanoma dataset.具有PVF脆弱项的非比例风险模型:在黑色素瘤数据集上的应用
J Appl Stat. 2024 May 14;52(1):1-27. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2354443. eCollection 2025.
2
Modern Approach to Melanoma Adjuvant Treatment with Anti-PD1 Immune Check Point Inhibitors or Targeted Therapy: Multicenter Real-World Report.使用抗PD1免疫检查点抑制剂或靶向治疗对黑色素瘤进行辅助治疗的现代方法:多中心真实世界报告。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 1;15(17):4384. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174384.
3
International Center-Level Variation in Utilization of Completion Lymph Node Dissection and Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma at Major Referral Centers.
国际主要转诊中心间前哨淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤行完全淋巴结清扫术和辅助全身治疗的应用的中心水平差异。
Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):e1106-e1115. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005370. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
4
Evidence and implementation gaps in management of sentinel node-positive melanoma in the United States.美国哨兵淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤管理中的证据和实施差距。
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.025. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Clinicopathologic models predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cutaneous melanoma patients: Are they useful for patients with a single positive sentinel node?预测皮肤黑色素瘤患者非前哨淋巴结转移的临床病理模型:对于单个前哨淋巴结阳性的患者是否有用?
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(3):516-524. doi: 10.1002/jso.26736. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
6
The Role of Clinical Prediction Tools to Risk Stratify Patients with Melanoma After a Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;28(8):4082-4083. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07099-5. Epub 2021 May 28.
7
Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Melanoma Patients with Reasons for Exclusion from MSLT-II: Multi-Institutional Propensity Score Matched Analysis.SLN 阳性黑色素瘤患者监测:MSLT-II 排除原因:多机构倾向评分匹配分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):424-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
8
Surgeon decision-making for management of positive sentinel lymph nodes in the post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II era: A survey study.多中心选择性淋巴结清扫试验 II 后时代外科医生处理前哨淋巴结阳性的决策:一项调查研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;123(2):646-653. doi: 10.1002/jso.26302. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
How does the mitotic index impact patients with T1 melanoma? Comparison between the 7th and 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system.有丝分裂指数如何影响T1期黑色素瘤患者?美国癌症联合委员会黑色素瘤分期系统第7版与第8版的比较。
An Bras Dermatol. 2020 Nov-Dec;95(6):691-695. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
Sentinel Node Status is the Most Important Prognostic Information for Clinical Stage IIB and IIC Melanoma Patients.前哨淋巴结状态是临床 IIB 期和 IIC 期黑色素瘤患者最重要的预后信息。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4133-4140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08959-9. Epub 2020 Aug 7.