• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性:使用大型欧洲基于人群的患者队列对风险预测计算器(澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所列线图)进行外部验证。

Predicting sentinel node positivity in patients with melanoma: external validation of a risk-prediction calculator (the Melanoma Institute Australia nomogram) using a large European population-based patient cohort.

机构信息

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2021 Aug;185(2):412-418. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19895. Epub 2021 May 9.

DOI:10.1111/bjd.19895
PMID:33657653
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A nomogram to predict sentinel node (SN) positivity [the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) nomogram] was recently developed and externally validated using two large single-institution databases. However, there remains a need to further validate the nomogram's performance using population-based data.

OBJECTIVES

To perform further validation of the nomogram using a European national patient cohort.

METHODS

Patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent SN biopsy in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2014 were included. Their data were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed by discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration. Negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated at various predicted probability cutoffs.

RESULTS

Of the 3049 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 23% (691) were SN positive. Validation of the MIA nomogram (including the parameters Breslow thickness, ulceration, age, melanoma subtype and lymphovascular invasion) showed a good C-statistic of 0·69 (95% confidence interval 0·66-0·71) with excellent calibration (R = 0·985, P = 0·40). The NPV of 90·1%, found at a 10% predicted probability cutoff for having a positive SN biopsy, implied that by using the nomogram, a 16·3% reduction in the rate of performing an SN biopsy could be achieved with an error rate of 1·6%. Validation of the MIA nomogram considering mitotic rate as present or absent showed a C-statistic of 0·70 (95% confidence interval 0·68-0·74).

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based validation study in European patients with melanoma confirmed the value of the MIA nomogram in predicting SN positivity. Its use will spare low-risk patients the inconvenience, cost and potential risks of SN biopsy while ensuring that high-risk patients are still identified.

摘要

背景

最近开发了一种用于预测前哨淋巴结(SN)阳性的列线图[澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所(MIA)列线图],并使用两个大型单机构数据库对其进行了外部验证。然而,仍然需要使用基于人群的数据进一步验证该列线图的性能。

目的

使用欧洲国家患者队列对列线图进行进一步验证。

方法

纳入 2000 年至 2014 年间在荷兰接受 SN 活检的皮肤黑色素瘤患者。他们的数据来自荷兰病理学登记处。通过判别(C 统计量)和校准评估列线图的预测性能。在不同预测概率截止值下计算阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

符合入选标准的 3049 例患者中,23%(691 例)SN 阳性。MIA 列线图(包括 Breslow 厚度、溃疡、年龄、黑色素瘤亚型和脉管侵犯)的验证显示,其 C 统计量为 0.69(95%置信区间 0.66-0.71),校准良好(R = 0.985,P = 0.40)。在预测概率为 10%的 SN 活检阳性的截断值下,NPV 为 90.1%,这意味着通过使用该列线图,可以将 SN 活检的实施率降低 16.3%,错误率为 1.6%。考虑有丝分裂率存在或不存在时,MIA 列线图的验证显示 C 统计量为 0.70(95%置信区间 0.68-0.74)。

结论

这项针对欧洲黑色素瘤患者的基于人群的验证研究证实了 MIA 列线图在预测 SN 阳性方面的价值。它的使用将使低风险患者免受 SN 活检的不便、成本和潜在风险,同时确保识别出高风险患者。

相似文献

1
Predicting sentinel node positivity in patients with melanoma: external validation of a risk-prediction calculator (the Melanoma Institute Australia nomogram) using a large European population-based patient cohort.预测黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性:使用大型欧洲基于人群的患者队列对风险预测计算器(澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所列线图)进行外部验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Aug;185(2):412-418. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19895. Epub 2021 May 9.
2
Improved Risk Prediction Calculator for Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients With Melanoma: The Melanoma Institute Australia Nomogram.澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所列线图:改良的黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性风险预测计算器。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 20;38(24):2719-2727. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02362. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Validation of a Nomogram for Non-sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma Patients, and Its Clinical Implications: A Brazilian-Dutch Study.验证黑色素瘤患者非前哨淋巴结阳性的列线图及其临床意义:一项巴西-荷兰研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):395-405. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7038-9. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Predicting recurrence in patients with sentinel node-negative melanoma: validation of the EORTC nomogram using population-based data.预测前哨淋巴结阴性黑色素瘤患者的复发:基于人群数据验证 EORTC 列线图。
Br J Surg. 2021 May 27;108(5):550-553. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11946.
5
Validation of a nomogram predicting sentinel lymph node status in melanoma in an Irish population.爱尔兰人群中预测黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结状态的列线图的验证
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Dec;184(4):769-73. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1166-4. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
6
Validation of the Melanoma Institute of Australia's Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Risk Prediction Tool for Cutaneous Melanoma.澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所前哨淋巴结活检风险预测工具对皮肤黑色素瘤的验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2737-2746. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14862-w. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Population-Based Validation of the MIA and MSKCC Tools for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Status.基于人群的 MIA 和 MSKCC 工具预测前哨淋巴结状态的验证。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Mar 1;159(3):260-268. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6904.
8
Validation of a nomogram to predict the presence of sentinel lymph node metastases in melanoma.预测黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移情况的列线图的验证
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2874-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0077-x. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
9
Impact of an Online Risk Calculator for Sentinel Node Positivity on Management of Patients with T1 and T2 Melanomas.在线前哨淋巴结阳性风险计算器对 T1 和 T2 期黑色素瘤患者管理的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5331-5339. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15456-w. Epub 2024 May 27.
10
The EORTC-DeCOG nomogram adequately predicts outcomes of patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma without the need for completion lymph node dissection.EORTC-DeCOG 列线图充分预测了前哨淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤患者的结局,无需进行淋巴结清扫术。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;134:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of risk prediction models for sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma in a high UV index region.高紫外线指数地区黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移风险预测模型的验证
JAAD Int. 2025 Jun 6;21:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2025.04.012. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Global Applicability of a Risk Prediction Tool for Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.一种用于原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性的风险预测工具的全球适用性
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.0318.
3
Risk Prediction Models for Sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结阳性的风险预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 May 1;161(5):523-532. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.0113.
4
Declining Clinical Utility of Tools for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Status: A Single Institution Experience from 2000 to 2021.预测前哨淋巴结活检状态工具的临床效用下降:2000年至2021年的单机构经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1463-1472. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16698-4. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
Validation of the Melanoma Institute of Australia's Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Risk Prediction Tool for Cutaneous Melanoma.澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所前哨淋巴结活检风险预测工具对皮肤黑色素瘤的验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2737-2746. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14862-w. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
Clinical Utility of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Nomograms.黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检列线图的临床应用
J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jan 1;238(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000886. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
7
Are the MIA and MSKCC nomograms useful in selecting patients with melanoma for sentinel lymph node biopsy?MIA 和 MSKCC 列线图是否有助于选择黑色素瘤患者进行前哨淋巴结活检?
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1167-1173. doi: 10.1002/jso.27231. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
A Clinical Decision Tool to Calculate Pretest Probability of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.一种用于计算原发性皮肤黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移的术前概率的临床决策工具。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4321-4328. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13220-0. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
9
Analysis of prognostic factors of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and construction and validation of a prediction nomogram based on SEER database.基于 SEER 数据库的未分化多形性肉瘤预后因素分析及预测列线图的构建与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Sep 15;27(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00810-z.