Interdisciplinary Population Health Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 25 University Private, Ottawa, ON, K1N 7K4, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Room 216A, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2019 Apr;110(2):139-148. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0151-5. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
Canadians have reason to care about indoor air quality as they spend over 90% of the time indoors. Although indoor radon causes more deaths than any other environmental hazard, only 55% of Canadians have heard of it, and of these, 6% have taken action. The gap between residents' risk awareness and adoption of actual protective behaviour presents a challenge to public health practitioners. Residents' perception of the risk should inform health communication that targets motivation for action. In Canada, research about the public perception of radon health risk is lacking. The aim of this study was to describe residents' perceptions of radon health risks and, applying a theoretical lens, evaluate how perceptions correlate with protection behaviours.
We conducted a mixed online and face-to-face survey (N = 557) with both homeowners and tenants in Ottawa-Gatineau census metropolitan area. Descriptive, correlation, and regression analyses addressed the research questions.
Compared to the gravity of the risk, public perception remained low. While 32% of residents expressed some concern about radon health risk, 12% of them tested and only 3% mitigated their homes for radon. Residents' perceptions of the probability and severity of the risk, social influence, care for children, and smoking in home correlated significantly with their intention to test; these factors also predicted their behaviours for testing and mitigation.
Health risk communication programs need to consider the affective aspects of risk perception in addition to rational cognition to improve protection behaviours. A qualitative study can explore the reasons behind the gap between testing and mitigation.
由于加拿大人超过 90%的时间都在室内度过,因此他们有理由关注室内空气质量。尽管室内氡导致的死亡人数超过了任何其他环境危害,但只有 55%的加拿大人听说过它,而听说过它的人中,只有 6%采取了行动。居民对风险的认识与实际采取保护行为之间的差距给公共卫生工作者带来了挑战。居民对风险的看法应该为针对行动动机的健康传播提供信息。在加拿大,关于公众对氡健康风险的看法的研究还很缺乏。本研究旨在描述居民对氡健康风险的看法,并应用理论视角评估这些看法与保护行为的相关性。
我们在渥太华-加蒂诺大都市区进行了一项混合式在线和面对面调查(N=557),调查对象包括房主和租户。描述性、相关性和回归分析解决了研究问题。
与风险的严重程度相比,公众的看法仍然很低。尽管 32%的居民对氡健康风险表示有些担忧,但只有 12%的居民进行了测试,只有 3%的居民对家中的氡进行了治理。居民对风险的可能性和严重程度、社会影响、对儿童的关心以及家中吸烟的看法与他们进行测试的意愿显著相关;这些因素也预测了他们进行测试和治理的行为。
健康风险沟通计划需要考虑风险感知的情感方面,除了理性认知,以改善保护行为。定性研究可以探讨测试和治理之间差距的背后原因。