• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在想象的社会情境中对物体进行编码的东西方文化差异。

East-West cultural differences in encoding objects in imagined social contexts.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Center on Aging Psychology, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207515. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0207515
PMID:30458021
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6245740/
Abstract

It has been shown in literature that East Asians are more inclined to process context information than individuals in Western cultures. Using a context memory task that requires studying object images in social contexts (i.e., rating objects in an imagined social or experiential scenario), our recent study revealed an age-invariant advantage for Chinese young and older participants compared to their Canadian counterparts in memory for encoding contexts. To examine whether this cultural difference also occurred during encoding, this follow-up report analyzed encoding performance and its relationship to subsequent memory based on the same data from the same task of the same sample. The results revealed that at encoding, Chinese participants provided higher ratings of objects, took longer to rate, and reported more vivid imagery of encoding contexts relative to their Canadian counterparts. Furthermore, only Chinese participants rated objects with recognized context at retrieval higher and slower relative to those with misrecognized context. For Chinese participants, primarily older adults, slower ratings were only related to better context memory but not item memory. Importantly, Chinese participants' context memory advantage disappeared after controlling for encoding differences. Taken together, these results suggest that Chinese participants' memory advantage for social contexts may have its origin in the construction of elaborative and meaningful object-context associations at encoding.

摘要

文献表明,东亚人比西方文化中的个体更倾向于处理语境信息。在一项需要在社会语境中研究物体图像的语境记忆任务中(即在想象的社会或体验场景中对物体进行评分),我们最近的研究表明,与加拿大同龄人相比,中国的年轻和年长参与者在记忆编码语境方面具有年龄不变的优势。为了检验这种文化差异是否也发生在编码过程中,本后续报告根据同一任务的相同数据和同一样本分析了编码表现及其与后续记忆的关系。结果表明,在编码过程中,与加拿大参与者相比,中国参与者对物体的评分更高,评分时间更长,对编码语境的想象更生动。此外,只有中国参与者在检索时对识别出的语境中的物体的评分更高、更慢,而对错误识别的语境中的物体的评分则更慢。对于中国参与者,主要是老年人,较慢的评分仅与更好的语境记忆相关,而与项目记忆无关。重要的是,在中国参与者的编码差异得到控制后,他们的语境记忆优势消失了。总之,这些结果表明,中国参与者在社会语境方面的记忆优势可能源于在编码过程中构建详尽而有意义的物体-语境关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/6245740/ba809bcb12a6/pone.0207515.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/6245740/f1991e36b528/pone.0207515.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/6245740/eeccd95d8a5d/pone.0207515.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/6245740/ba809bcb12a6/pone.0207515.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/6245740/f1991e36b528/pone.0207515.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/6245740/eeccd95d8a5d/pone.0207515.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd1e/6245740/ba809bcb12a6/pone.0207515.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
East-West cultural differences in encoding objects in imagined social contexts.在想象的社会情境中对物体进行编码的东西方文化差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207515. eCollection 2018.
2
Aging, culture, and memory for socially meaningful item-context associations: an East-West cross-cultural comparison study.老龄化、文化与具有社会意义的项目-情境关联的记忆:一项东西文化比较研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 11;8(4):e60703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060703. Print 2013.
3
Mental reinstatement of encoding context improves episodic remembering.记忆情景的重新激活增强了情景记忆。
Cortex. 2017 Sep;94:15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
4
The proximate memory mechanism underlying the survival-processing effect: richness of encoding or interactive imagery?生存加工效应的近因记忆机制:丰富的编码还是交互意象?
Memory. 2013;21(4):494-502. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.741603. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
5
Episodic action memory for real objects: an ERP investigation with perform, watch, and imagine action encoding tasks versus a non-action encoding task.真实物体的情景动作记忆:一项ERP研究,涉及执行、观看和想象动作编码任务与非动作编码任务的对比
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):402-19. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361921.
6
The Neural Dynamics of Novel Scene Imagery.新颖场景意象的神经动力学。
J Neurosci. 2019 May 29;39(22):4375-4386. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2497-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
7
Survival processing modulates the neurocognitive mechanisms of episodic encoding.生存加工调节情景记忆编码的神经认知机制。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Aug;20(4):717-729. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00798-1.
8
"When I was little": childhood recollections in Chinese and European Canadian grade school children.“我小时候”:华裔和欧裔加拿大小学生的童年回忆
Child Dev. 2009 Mar-Apr;80(2):506-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01275.x.
9
How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm.我该如何使用它?功能固着在生存加工范式中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):324-332. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01802-y.
10
Does context matter for memory? Testing the effectiveness of learning by imagining situated interactions with objects.情境对记忆有影响吗?通过想象与物体的情境交互来测试学习的有效性。
Memory. 2024 Apr;32(4):502-514. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2336161. Epub 2024 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural differences in distraction processing: influence of context at retrieval.注意力分散加工中的文化差异:提取时背景的影响
Memory. 2018 Nov;26(10):1396-1401. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1483517. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
2
Aging, culture, and memory for socially meaningful item-context associations: an East-West cross-cultural comparison study.老龄化、文化与具有社会意义的项目-情境关联的记忆:一项东西文化比较研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 11;8(4):e60703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060703. Print 2013.
3
Aging, culture, and memory for categorically processed information.
年龄、文化与范畴化信息记忆
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Nov;68(6):872-81. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt006. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
4
How does context affect assessments of facial emotion? The role of culture and age.语境如何影响面部情绪评估?文化和年龄的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Mar;26(1):48-59. doi: 10.1037/a0020222.
5
Neural differences in the processing of semantic relationships across cultures.跨文化语义关系处理中的神经差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):254-63. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp059. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
6
Placing the face in context: cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion.将面部表情置于情境中:面部情绪感知中的文化差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;94(3):365-81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.365.
7
Age and culture modulate object processing and object-scene binding in the ventral visual area.年龄和文化调节腹侧视觉区域中的物体处理及物体-场景联结。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):44-52. doi: 10.3758/cabn.7.1.44.
8
Source memory, aging and culture.来源记忆、衰老与文化。
Gerontology. 2006;52(5):306-13. doi: 10.1159/000094612.
9
Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception.场景感知过程中眼动的文化差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12629-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
10
A cross-culturally standardized set of pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity.一套针对年轻人和老年人的跨文化标准化图片:美国和中国在名称一致性、概念一致性及熟悉度方面的规范。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):639-49. doi: 10.3758/bf03206545.