Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street 3S-438, Toronto, M5G 2C4, Canada.
OtoSim Inc., Toronto, Canada.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 20;47(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0317-4.
Portable educational technologies, like simulators, afford students the opportunity to learn independently. A key question in education, is how to pair self-regulated learning (SRL) with direct instruction. A cloud-based portable otoscopy simulator was employed to compare two curricula involving SRL. Pre-clerkship medical students used a prototype smartphone application, a 3D ear attachment and an otoscope to complete either otoscopy curriculum.
Pre-clerkship medical students were recruited and randomized to two curriculum designs. The "Discovery then Instruction" group received the simulator one week before a traditional lecture, while the "Instruction then Discovery" group received it after the lecture. To assess participants' ability to identify otoscopic pathology, we used a 100-item test at baseline, post-intervention and 2-week retention time points. Secondary outcomes included self-reported comfort, time spent using the device, and a survey on learning preferences.
Thirty-four students completed the study. Analysis of knowledge acquisition and retention showed improvement in scores of both groups and no significant effects of group (F = 0.53, p = 0.47). An analysis of participants' self-reported comfort showed a significant group x test interaction (F = 4.61, p = 0.04), where only the discovery then instruction group's comfort improved significantly. Overall device usage was low, as the discovery then instruction group spent 21.47 ± 26.28 min, while the instruction then discovery group spent 13.84 ± 18.71 min. The discovery first group's time spent with the simulator correlated moderately with their post-test score (r = 0.42, p = 0.07). After the intervention, most participants in both groups (63-68%) stated that they would prefer the instruction then discovery sequence.
Both curricular sequences led to improved knowledge scores with no statistically significant knowledge differences. When given minimal guidance, students engaged in discovery learning minimally. There is value in SRL in simulation education, and we plan to further improve our curricular design by considering learner behaviours identified in this study.
便携式教育技术,如模拟器,为学生提供了独立学习的机会。教育中的一个关键问题是如何将自我调节学习(SRL)与直接指导相结合。本研究采用基于云的便携式耳镜模拟器比较了两种涉及 SRL 的课程。在 clerkship 之前的医学生使用原型智能手机应用程序、3D 耳朵附件和耳镜完成了耳镜课程。
招募并随机分配 pre-clerkship 医学生参加两种课程设计。“发现后指导”组在传统讲座前一周接受模拟器培训,而“指导后发现”组在讲座后接受培训。为了评估参与者识别耳镜病理的能力,我们在基线、干预后和 2 周保留时间点使用了 100 项测试。次要结果包括自我报告的舒适度、使用设备的时间以及学习偏好调查。
34 名学生完成了研究。知识获取和保留的分析显示,两组的分数均有所提高,且组间无显著差异(F = 0.53,p = 0.47)。对参与者自我报告的舒适度分析显示,组间测试交互存在显著差异(F = 4.61,p = 0.04),仅发现后指导组的舒适度显著提高。总体设备使用率较低,因为发现后指导组使用了 21.47 ± 26.28 分钟,而指导后发现组使用了 13.84 ± 18.71 分钟。发现第一组的模拟器使用时间与他们的后测分数中度相关(r = 0.42,p = 0.07)。干预后,两组的大多数参与者(63-68%)表示他们更喜欢指导后发现的顺序。
两种课程序列都导致了知识分数的提高,并且没有统计学上的显著知识差异。在给予最低限度的指导时,学生的自主学习参与度很低。在模拟教育中,SRL 具有价值,我们计划通过考虑本研究中确定的学习者行为进一步改进我们的课程设计。