Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症和自闭症谱系障碍中的社会认知:直接比较的系统评价与荟萃分析

Social Cognition in Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparisons.

作者信息

Fernandes João Miguel, Cajão Rute, Lopes Ricardo, Jerónimo Rita, Barahona-Corrêa J Bernardo

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 24;9:504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00504. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Deficits in social cognition are well-recognized in both schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, it is less clear how social cognition deficits differ between both disorders and what distinct mechanisms may underlie such differences. We aimed at reviewing available evidence from studies directly comparing social cognitive performance between individuals with schizophrenia and ASD. We performed a systematic review of literature up to May 22, 2018 on Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Search terms included combinations of the keywords "social cognition," "theory of mind," "autism," "Asperger," "psychosis," and "schizophrenia." Two researchers independently selected and extracted data according to PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for performance on social cognitive tasks evaluating: (1) emotion perception; (2) theory of mind (ToM); (3) emotional intelligence (managing emotions score of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test); and (4) social skills. We identified 19 eligible studies for meta-analysis including a total of 1,040 patients (558 with schizophrenia and 482 with ASD). Eight studies provided data on facial emotion perception that evidenced a better performance by participants with schizophrenia compared to those with ASD (Hedges' g = 0.43; = 0.031). No significant differences were found between groups in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (8 studies; Hedges' g = 0.22; = 0.351), other ToM tasks (9 studies; Hedges' g = -0.03; = 0.903), emotional intelligence (3 studies; Hedges' g = -0.17; = 0.490), and social skills (3 studies; Hedges' g = 0.86; = 0.056). Participants' age was a significant moderator of effect size in emotion perception and RMET analyzes, with larger differences favoring patients with schizophrenia being observed in studies with younger participants. The instruments that are currently available to evaluate social cognition poorly differentiate between individuals with schizophrenia and ASD. Combining behavioral tasks with neurophysiologic assessments may better characterize the differences in social cognition between both disorders.

摘要

社会认知缺陷在精神分裂症和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中均已得到充分认识。然而,这两种障碍的社会认知缺陷如何不同,以及哪些独特机制可能是这些差异的基础,目前尚不清楚。我们旨在回顾直接比较精神分裂症患者和ASD患者社会认知表现的研究中的现有证据。我们对截至2018年5月22日发表在PubMed、科学网和Scopus上的文献进行了系统综述。检索词包括“社会认知”、“心理理论”、“自闭症”、“阿斯伯格综合征”、“精神病”和“精神分裂症”等关键词的组合。两名研究人员根据PRISMA指南独立选择和提取数据。对评估以下方面的社会认知任务表现进行了随机效应荟萃分析:(1)情绪感知;(2)心理理论(ToM);(3)情商(梅耶-萨洛维-卡鲁索情商测试的情绪管理得分);以及(4)社交技能。我们确定了19项符合荟萃分析条件的研究,共纳入1040名患者(558名精神分裂症患者和482名ASD患者)。八项研究提供了面部情绪感知数据,结果表明精神分裂症患者的表现优于ASD患者(赫奇斯g值 = 0.43;P = 0.031)。在“读心术”测试(八项研究;赫奇斯g值 = 0.22;P = 0.351)、其他心理理论任务(九项研究;赫奇斯g值 = -0.03;P = 0.903)、情商(三项研究;赫奇斯g值 = -0.17;P = 0.490)和社交技能(三项研究;赫奇斯g值 = 0.86;P = 0.056)方面,两组之间未发现显著差异。在情绪感知和“读心术”测试分析中,参与者的年龄是效应大小的显著调节因素,在涉及年轻参与者的研究中,观察到精神分裂症患者的差异更大。目前用于评估社会认知的工具难以很好地区分精神分裂症患者和ASD患者。将行为任务与神经生理学评估相结合可能更好地描述这两种障碍在社会认知方面的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cbb/6232921/e1d94e37ffec/fpsyt-09-00504-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验