Singh Roop, Yadav Sushil Kumar, Sood Sushma, Yadav Rohtas Kumar, Rohilla Ravi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Paraplegia and Rehabilitation, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Physiology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct-Dec;13(4):1078-1083. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_169_17.
Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common medical complaints and leading cause of workforce loss in many countries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a highly sensitive method for the detection of lesions in the spine because of its excellent imaging of anatomical detail. However, MRI does not provide information about physiological nerve function and has relatively low specificity. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) study, including needle electromyography (EMG), is a specific test to assess the physiological functions of nerve roots or peripheral nerves. The aim of the present study was to correlate the electrophysiological and MRI findings in chronic low backache patients.
Fifty patients (26 males and 24 females) with mean age 33.54 ± 8.33 years with a history of LBP of minimum 3 consecutive months were evaluated with MRI and EDX (bilateral nerve conduction study of three nerves [tibial, peroneal, and sural nerve] and bilateral EMG of three muscles [paraspinal, tibialis anterior, vastus medialis]) studies.
Twenty-seven patients showed disc involvement on MRI and 23 MRI were normal. Mean conduction velocity was mildly decreased in tibial and sural nerves in all the patients either with normal MRI or disc involvement on MRI. In disc involvement conduction velocity, decrease was more as compared to normal MRI. About 39% patients with normal MRI and 78% patients with disc involvement showed abnormal EMG. This data represented statistically significant association of EDX study with MRI ( < 0.05).
In patients with LBP, EDX studies are significantly more correlated with clinical data than MRI. Therefore, EMG may be a useful diagnostic tool to establish management protocols and prevent unnecessary interventions. EDX gives a better representation of physiological status of nerve and muscle, a supra added benefit which MRI lacks. However, MRI gives better visualization of anatomic parameters and structural details which may or may not be associated with chronic LBP.
下腰痛(LBP)是最常见的医学主诉之一,也是许多国家劳动力丧失的主要原因。磁共振成像(MRI)因其对解剖细节的出色成像,是检测脊柱病变的高度敏感方法。然而,MRI无法提供有关生理神经功能的信息,且特异性相对较低。电诊断(EDX)研究,包括针极肌电图(EMG),是评估神经根或周围神经生理功能的特异性检查。本研究的目的是将慢性下背痛患者的电生理和MRI结果进行关联。
对50例平均年龄33.54±8.33岁、有至少连续3个月LBP病史的患者(26例男性和24例女性)进行了MRI和EDX评估(对三条神经[胫神经、腓总神经和腓肠神经]进行双侧神经传导研究,对三块肌肉[椎旁肌、胫骨前肌、股内侧肌]进行双侧EMG检查)。
27例患者MRI显示椎间盘受累,23例MRI正常。所有MRI正常或MRI显示椎间盘受累的患者,胫神经和腓肠神经的平均传导速度均轻度降低。与MRI正常者相比,椎间盘受累者的传导速度降低更明显。MRI正常的患者中约39%以及椎间盘受累的患者中78%显示EMG异常。该数据表明EDX研究与MRI之间存在统计学显著关联(<0.05)。
在LBP患者中,EDX研究与临床数据的相关性显著高于MRI。因此,EMG可能是建立治疗方案和避免不必要干预的有用诊断工具。EDX能更好地反映神经和肌肉的生理状态,这是MRI所缺乏的额外优势。然而,MRI能更好地显示可能与慢性LBP相关或不相关的解剖参数和结构细节。