Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Miljøvej. Building 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Edificio Expo, Calle Inca Garcilaso 3, 41092 Seville, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2689-2700. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.136. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
Cascading utilisation of post-consumer wood waste has recently gained increasing attention in the European Union, aiming for a society in which the resource's properties are optimized through sequential uses. To date, material utilisation of wood waste has been limited to particleboard production, with additional niche alternatives being restricted by quality requirements for wood waste. In this consequential life cycle assessment focusing on post-consumer wood collected at Danish recycling centres, Global Warming Potential (GWP) impacts from quality-driven choices for cascading management of wood waste were compared with those from handling mixed wood waste qualities. GWPs were modelled by considering the dynamic profile of greenhouse gas emissions (including biogenic carbon dioxide) for two time horizons (100 and 500 years). The robustness of the results was tested by varying modelling assumptions with respect to electricity system, wood sourcing and associated rotation period, and impacts from indirect land use changes. The results demonstrated that valuing quality over quantity in wood waste management can ensure larger GWP savings, especially if recycling applications have a long lifetime and/or substitute energy-intensive products; such results were confirmed under all scenario analyses. Inclusion of land use changes credited land-intensive products. More cascade steps of the wood waste resource ensured larger savings; however, assumptions on the electricity mix, on the source of the wood alongside the choice of the time horizon for GWP greatly influenced the results on cascading management.
欧盟最近越来越关注消费后木材废物的级联利用,旨在实现一个通过连续使用优化资源特性的社会。迄今为止,木材废物的材料利用仅限于刨花板生产,而其他利基替代品由于对木材废物的质量要求而受到限制。在本次重点关注丹麦回收中心收集的消费后木材的生命周期影响评估中,对质量驱动的木材废物级联管理的选择与混合木材废物质量处理的全球变暖潜势(GWP)影响进行了比较。通过考虑温室气体排放的动态特征(包括生物二氧化碳),对两个时间范围(100 年和 500 年)的 GWP 进行了建模。通过改变与电力系统、木材采购和相关轮作期以及间接土地利用变化的影响有关的建模假设,对结果的稳健性进行了测试。结果表明,在木材废物管理中重视质量而不是数量,可以确保更大的 GWP 节约,特别是如果回收应用具有较长的使用寿命和/或替代能源密集型产品;在所有情景分析下都得到了证实。土地利用变化的纳入为土地密集型产品提供了信用。更多的木材废物资源级联步骤确保了更大的节约;然而,电力组合、木材来源以及 GWP 的时间范围选择的假设对级联管理的结果有很大影响。