Bourne Jessica E, Cooper Ashley R, Kelly Paul, Kinnear Fiona J, England Clare, Leary Sam, Page Angie
Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School of Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Transp Health. 2020 Dec;19:100910. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100910. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have become increasingly popular in the past decade. This review aimed to scope the literature to identify what is known about the frequency and duration of e-bike use, their impact on travel behaviour, the purposes for which e-bikes are used and factors associated with e-bike use. In addition, the review aimed to identify gaps in the literature and highlight future research priorities.
A scoping review of published and unpublished literature in any language. Relevant articles were identified through searching six databases, two grey literature platforms and reference lists. Searches were conducted until August 2019. Data were extracted using a standardised extraction form and descriptive and narrative results are provided.
Seventy-six studies met the inclusion criteria. The volume of research has increased since 2017 and primarily examines personal e-bike use, as opposed to e-bike share/rental schemes or organizational e-bike initiatives. The use of e-bikes increased the frequency and duration of cycling compared to conventional cycling and may help overcome barriers associated with conventional cycling. The uptake in e-cycling largely substitutes for conventional cycling or private car journeys, though the degree of substitution depends on the primary transport mode prior to e-bike acquisition. E-bikes are primarily used for utilitarian reasons, though older adults also engage in recreational e-cycling. Research priorities include quantitatively examining e-bike use, their impact on overall transport behaviour and identifying determinants of e-cycling to inform intervention and policy.
This review suggests that the personal use of e-bikes is associated with a reduction in motorized vehicle use, which has potential positive impacts on the environment and health. The impacts of e-bike share schemes and workplace initiatives are less well understood. Evidence describing the purposes for which e-bikes are used, and the factors associated with usage, are useful to inform e-cycling promotion policy.
在过去十年中,电动助力自行车(电动自行车)越来越受欢迎。本综述旨在梳理文献,以确定关于电动自行车使用频率和时长、其对出行行为的影响、使用电动自行车的目的以及与电动自行车使用相关的因素的已知情况。此外,该综述旨在找出文献中的空白,并突出未来的研究重点。
对任何语言的已发表和未发表文献进行范围综述。通过搜索六个数据库、两个灰色文献平台和参考文献列表来识别相关文章。搜索持续到2019年8月。使用标准化提取表提取数据,并提供描述性和叙述性结果。
76项研究符合纳入标准。自2017年以来,研究数量有所增加,主要研究的是个人电动自行车的使用,而非电动自行车共享/租赁计划或组织的电动自行车倡议。与传统骑行相比,电动自行车的使用增加了骑行的频率和时长,并且可能有助于克服与传统骑行相关的障碍。电动自行车骑行的增加在很大程度上替代了传统骑行或私家车出行,不过替代程度取决于购买电动自行车之前的主要交通方式。电动自行车主要用于功利性目的,不过老年人也会进行休闲电动自行车骑行。研究重点包括对电动自行车使用进行定量研究、其对整体交通行为的影响以及确定电动自行车骑行的决定因素,以为干预措施和政策提供依据。
本综述表明,个人使用电动自行车与机动车使用的减少有关,这对环境和健康可能产生积极影响。电动自行车共享计划和工作场所倡议的影响则了解较少。描述电动自行车使用目的以及与使用相关因素的证据,有助于为电动自行车骑行推广政策提供参考。