Lemaitre Joseph, Pasetto Damiano, Perez-Saez Javier, Sciarra Carla, Wamala Joseph Francis, Rinaldo Andrea
Laboratory of Ecohydrology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Ambiente, del Territorio e delle Infrastrutture, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.
Acta Trop. 2019 Feb;190:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
The correlation between cholera epidemics and climatic drivers, in particular seasonal tropical rainfall, has been studied in a variety of contexts owing to its documented relevance. Several mechanistic models of cholera transmission have included rainfall as a driver by focusing on two possible transmission pathways: either by increasing exposure to contaminated water (e.g. due to worsening sanitary conditions during water excess), or water contamination by freshly excreted bacteria (e.g. due to washout of open-air defecation sites or overflows). Our study assesses the explanatory power of these different modeling structures by formal model comparison using deterministic and stochastic models of the type susceptible-infected-recovered-bacteria (SIRB). The incorporation of rainfall effects is generalized using a nonlinear function that can increase or decrease the relative importance of the large precipitation events. Our modelling framework is tested against the daily epidemiological data collected during the 2015 cholera outbreak within the urban context of Juba, South Sudan. This epidemic is characterized by a particular intra-seasonal double peak on the incidence in apparent relation with particularly strong rainfall events. Our results show that rainfall-based models in both their deterministic and stochastic formulations outperform models that do not account for rainfall. In fact, classical SIRB models are not able to reproduce the second epidemiological peak, thus suggesting that it was rainfall-driven. Moreover we found stronger support across model types for rainfall acting on increased exposure rather than on exacerbated water contamination. Although these results are context-specific, they stress the importance of a systematic and comprehensive appraisal of transmission pathways and their environmental forcings when embarking in the modelling of epidemic cholera.
由于霍乱流行与气候驱动因素,特别是季节性热带降雨之间的关联已有文献记载,因此在各种背景下都对其进行了研究。霍乱传播的几种机制模型都将降雨作为一个驱动因素,重点关注两种可能的传播途径:一是通过增加接触受污染水的机会(例如,由于水量过多时卫生条件恶化),二是通过新排出的细菌污染水(例如,由于露天排便场所被冲刷或溢流)。我们的研究通过使用易感-感染-康复-细菌(SIRB)类型的确定性和随机模型进行形式化模型比较,评估了这些不同建模结构的解释力。使用一个非线性函数来概括降雨效应的纳入,该函数可以增加或降低大降水事件的相对重要性。我们的建模框架针对2015年南苏丹朱巴市城区霍乱疫情期间收集的每日流行病学数据进行了测试。此次疫情的特点是发病率出现特定的季节内双峰,这显然与特别强烈的降雨事件有关。我们的结果表明,基于降雨的模型,无论是确定性模型还是随机模型,都优于不考虑降雨的模型。事实上,经典的SIRB模型无法重现第二个流行病学高峰,因此表明它是由降雨驱动的。此外,我们发现各种模型类型都更支持降雨通过增加接触机会而非加剧水污染来发挥作用。尽管这些结果是特定于具体背景的,但它们强调了在着手进行霍乱流行建模时,对传播途径及其环境驱动因素进行系统全面评估的重要性。