• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊环境下吸入甲氧氟烷与静脉注射吗啡用于严重创伤疼痛的比较:多中心、随机、对照、开放标签试验MEDITA的亚组分析

Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.

作者信息

Voza Antonio, Ruggiano Germana, Serra Sossio, Carpinteri Giuseppe, Gangitano Gianfilippo, Intelligente Fabio, Bonafede Elisabetta, Sblendido Antonella, Farina Alberto, Soldi Amedeo, Fabbri Andrea

机构信息

Emergency Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Teaching Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Emergency Medicine Department, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2020 Mar 6;13:491-502. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S240911. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S240911
PMID:32184653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7064290/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Opioid analgesics remain the cornerstone of treatment for severe trauma pain in the emergency setting, but there are barriers to their use. This post hoc analysis of a previously reported trial (MEDITA) investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose methoxyflurane versus intravenous (IV) morphine for severe trauma pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MEDITA was a Phase IIIb, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study in Italian pre-hospital units and emergency departments (EudraCT: 2017-001565-25; NCT03585374). Adult patients (N=272) with moderate-to-severe trauma pain (score ≥4 on the Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) were randomized 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment (SAT; IV paracetamol 1g or ketoprofen 100mg for moderate pain [NRS 4-6] and IV morphine 0.1mg/kg for severe pain [NRS ≥7]). Analyses were performed for the severe pain subgroup. The primary efficacy variable was the overall change from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity at 3, 5 and 10min post-randomization. Non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus morphine was concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference was <1; superiority was concluded if the upper 95% CI was <0.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (methoxyflurane: 49; SAT: 44) were included in the severe pain intention-to-treat population. The reduction in VAS pain intensity over the first 10min was superior for methoxyflurane versus morphine (adjusted mean treatment difference: -5.54mm; 95% CI: -10.49, -0.59mm; p=0.029). Median time to onset of pain relief was 9min for methoxyflurane and 15min for morphine. Patients rated treatment efficacy and physicians rated treatment practicality "Excellent" or "Very good" for more methoxyflurane-treated patients (42.8% and 67.3%) than morphine-treated patients (18.1% and 22.8%). Adverse events, all non-serious, were reported in 20.4% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and in 4.8% of morphine-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Methoxyflurane provided superior short-term pain relief to IV morphine in patients with severe trauma pain and offers an effective non-narcotic treatment option.

摘要

目的

阿片类镇痛药仍是急诊中严重创伤疼痛治疗的基石,但在其使用方面存在障碍。这项对先前报道的试验(MEDITA)的事后分析,研究了低剂量甲氟醚与静脉注射吗啡治疗严重创伤疼痛的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

MEDITA是一项在意大利院前单位和急诊科进行的IIIb期、随机、活性对照、平行组、开放标签研究(欧洲临床试验数据库编号:2017 - 001565 -

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/db24209c4d52/JPR-13-491-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/929eff92d432/JPR-13-491-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/0a1565d22242/JPR-13-491-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/a63b8c49d5aa/JPR-13-491-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/cc1788d3e0cb/JPR-13-491-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/db24209c4d52/JPR-13-491-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/929eff92d432/JPR-13-491-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/0a1565d22242/JPR-13-491-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/a63b8c49d5aa/JPR-13-491-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/cc1788d3e0cb/JPR-13-491-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/db24209c4d52/JPR-13-491-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.急诊环境下吸入甲氧氟烷与静脉注射吗啡用于严重创伤疼痛的比较:多中心、随机、对照、开放标签试验MEDITA的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Mar 6;13:491-502. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S240911. eCollection 2020.
2
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).吸入甲氧氟烷对急诊急性创伤疼痛的镇痛效果、实用性和安全性与标准镇痛治疗的比较:意大利一项随机、开放标签、阳性对照、多中心试验(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Nov;36(11):3030-3046. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
3
Efficacy, Practicality, and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane in Elderly Patients with Acute Trauma Pain: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial (MEDITA).吸入式甲氧氟烷用于老年急性创伤疼痛患者的疗效、实用性及安全性:一项随机、对照、多中心、开放标签试验(MEDITA)的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 16;13:1777-1784. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S255532. eCollection 2020.
4
Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA).甲氧基氟烷与常规护理治疗急诊创伤相关疼痛的比较:意大利一项随机对照研究方案(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):244-256. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0830-x. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Comparison of three regimens with inhalational methoxyflurane versus intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in pre-hospital acute pain management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PreMeFen).比较三种方案:吸入甲氧氟烷、鼻内芬太尼和静脉注射吗啡在院前急性疼痛管理中的效果:一项随机对照试验(PreMeFen)的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 5;24(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07590-9.
6
Low-dose methoxyflurane analgesia in adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain: a subgroup analysis of the STOP! study.低剂量甲氧氟烷用于中重度创伤疼痛青少年患者的镇痛:STOP!研究的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2019 Feb 15;12:689-700. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S188675. eCollection 2019.
7
Methoxyflurane Analgesia in Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study (STOP!).急诊科成年患者的甲氧氟烷镇痛:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(STOP!)的亚组分析
Adv Ther. 2016 Nov;33(11):2012-2031. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0405-7. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
8
Inhaled Methoxyflurane Provides Greater Analgesia and Faster Onset of Action Versus Standard Analgesia in Patients With Trauma Pain: InMEDIATE: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Emergency Departments.吸入甲氧氟烷相较于标准镇痛在创伤疼痛患者中提供更强的镇痛效果和更快的起效时间:INMEDIATE:急诊科的一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):315-328. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
9
Evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of inhaled methoxyflurane versus usual analgesia for prehospital injury and trauma: non-randomised clinical study.评估吸入甲氧氟烷与常规镇痛用于院前损伤和创伤的疗效和成本:非随机临床研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00664-y.
10
Intranasal sufentanil versus intravenous morphine for acute severe trauma pain: A double-blind randomized non-inferiority study.鼻腔内给予舒芬太尼与静脉内给予吗啡治疗急性重度创伤疼痛:一项双盲随机非劣效性研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 16;16(7):e1002849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002849. eCollection 2019 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients.2023 年 WSES 老年和虚弱患者创伤管理指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 May 31;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00537-8.
2
Parenteral, Non-Intravenous Analgesia in Acute Traumatic Pain-A Narrative Review Based on a Systematic Literature Search.急性创伤性疼痛的非静脉注射肠外镇痛——基于系统文献检索的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 26;13(9):2560. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092560.
3
Does Inhaled Methoxyflurane Implement Fast and Efficient Pain Management in Trauma Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhaled Methoxyflurane Provides Greater Analgesia and Faster Onset of Action Versus Standard Analgesia in Patients With Trauma Pain: InMEDIATE: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Emergency Departments.吸入甲氧氟烷相较于标准镇痛在创伤疼痛患者中提供更强的镇痛效果和更快的起效时间:INMEDIATE:急诊科的一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):315-328. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).吸入甲氧氟烷对急诊急性创伤疼痛的镇痛效果、实用性和安全性与标准镇痛治疗的比较:意大利一项随机、开放标签、阳性对照、多中心试验(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Nov;36(11):3030-3046. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
3
吸入甲氧氟烷能否在创伤患者中实现快速有效的疼痛管理?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):651-674. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00258-9. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
4
Determination of equi-analgesic doses of inhaled methoxyflurane versus intravenous fentanyl using the cold pressor test in volunteers: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study.采用冷加压试验测定志愿者吸入甲氧氟烷与静脉注射芬太尼等效镇痛剂量:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):1038-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.045. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Efficacy, Practicality, and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane in Elderly Patients with Acute Trauma Pain: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial (MEDITA).吸入式甲氧氟烷用于老年急性创伤疼痛患者的疗效、实用性及安全性:一项随机、对照、多中心、开放标签试验(MEDITA)的亚组分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 16;13:1777-1784. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S255532. eCollection 2020.
Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) versus placebo for injury-associated analgesia in children-the MAGPIE trial (MEOF-002): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.吸入甲氧氟烷(Penthrōx®)与安慰剂治疗儿童损伤相关疼痛的效果比较——MAGPIE 试验(MEOF-002):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3511-4.
4
Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA).甲氧基氟烷与常规护理治疗急诊创伤相关疼痛的比较:意大利一项随机对照研究方案(MEDITA)。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):244-256. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0830-x. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
The role of inhaled methoxyflurane in acute pain management.吸入式甲氧氟烷在急性疼痛管理中的作用。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 18;10:149-164. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S181222. eCollection 2018.
6
Prospective, Multicentre Trial of Methoxyflurane for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in Helicopter Emergency Medical Systems and Hostile Environments: METEORA Protocol.甲氧基氟烷用于直升机紧急医疗系统和恶劣环境中急性创伤相关疼痛的前瞻性、多中心试验:METEORA 方案。
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):2081-2092. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0816-8. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
A Review of the Burden of Trauma Pain in Emergency Settings in Europe.欧洲急诊环境中创伤疼痛负担的综述。
Pain Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):179-192. doi: 10.1007/s40122-018-0101-1. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
8
Administration of intravenous morphine for acute pain in the emergency department inflicts an economic burden in Europe.在欧洲,急诊科使用静脉注射吗啡治疗急性疼痛会带来经济负担。
Drugs Context. 2018 Apr 11;7:212524. doi: 10.7573/dic.212524. eCollection 2018.
9
A review of the safety and efficacy of inhaled methoxyflurane as an analgesic for outpatient procedures.吸入甲氧氟烷作为门诊手术镇痛剂的安全性和有效性评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1040-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
10
Prospective study on prevalence, intensity, type, and therapy of acute pain in a second-level urban emergency department.二级城市急诊科急性疼痛的患病率、强度、类型及治疗的前瞻性研究
J Pain Res. 2017 Dec 12;10:2781-2788. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S137992. eCollection 2017.