Suppr超能文献

急诊环境下吸入甲氧氟烷与静脉注射吗啡用于严重创伤疼痛的比较:多中心、随机、对照、开放标签试验MEDITA的亚组分析

Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.

作者信息

Voza Antonio, Ruggiano Germana, Serra Sossio, Carpinteri Giuseppe, Gangitano Gianfilippo, Intelligente Fabio, Bonafede Elisabetta, Sblendido Antonella, Farina Alberto, Soldi Amedeo, Fabbri Andrea

机构信息

Emergency Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Teaching Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Emergency Medicine Department, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2020 Mar 6;13:491-502. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S240911. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Opioid analgesics remain the cornerstone of treatment for severe trauma pain in the emergency setting, but there are barriers to their use. This post hoc analysis of a previously reported trial (MEDITA) investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose methoxyflurane versus intravenous (IV) morphine for severe trauma pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MEDITA was a Phase IIIb, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study in Italian pre-hospital units and emergency departments (EudraCT: 2017-001565-25; NCT03585374). Adult patients (N=272) with moderate-to-severe trauma pain (score ≥4 on the Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) were randomized 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment (SAT; IV paracetamol 1g or ketoprofen 100mg for moderate pain [NRS 4-6] and IV morphine 0.1mg/kg for severe pain [NRS ≥7]). Analyses were performed for the severe pain subgroup. The primary efficacy variable was the overall change from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity at 3, 5 and 10min post-randomization. Non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus morphine was concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference was <1; superiority was concluded if the upper 95% CI was <0.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (methoxyflurane: 49; SAT: 44) were included in the severe pain intention-to-treat population. The reduction in VAS pain intensity over the first 10min was superior for methoxyflurane versus morphine (adjusted mean treatment difference: -5.54mm; 95% CI: -10.49, -0.59mm; p=0.029). Median time to onset of pain relief was 9min for methoxyflurane and 15min for morphine. Patients rated treatment efficacy and physicians rated treatment practicality "Excellent" or "Very good" for more methoxyflurane-treated patients (42.8% and 67.3%) than morphine-treated patients (18.1% and 22.8%). Adverse events, all non-serious, were reported in 20.4% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and in 4.8% of morphine-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Methoxyflurane provided superior short-term pain relief to IV morphine in patients with severe trauma pain and offers an effective non-narcotic treatment option.

摘要

目的

阿片类镇痛药仍是急诊中严重创伤疼痛治疗的基石,但在其使用方面存在障碍。这项对先前报道的试验(MEDITA)的事后分析,研究了低剂量甲氟醚与静脉注射吗啡治疗严重创伤疼痛的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

MEDITA是一项在意大利院前单位和急诊科进行的IIIb期、随机、活性对照、平行组、开放标签研究(欧洲临床试验数据库编号:2017 - 001565 -

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/7064290/929eff92d432/JPR-13-491-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验