Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT.
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;73(4):345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Barriers to early antibiotic administration for sepsis remain poorly understood. We investigated the association between emergency department (ED) crowding and door-to-antibiotic time in ED sepsis.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED sepsis patients presenting to 2 community hospitals, a regional referral hospital, and a tertiary teaching hospital. The primary exposure was ED occupancy rate, defined as the ratio of registered ED patients to licensed ED beds. We defined ED overcrowding as an ED occupancy rate greater than or equal to 1. We used multivariable regression to measure the adjusted association between ED crowding and door-to-antibiotic time (elapsed time from ED arrival to first antibiotic initiation). Using Markov multistate models, we also investigated the association between ED crowding and pre-antibiotic care processes.
Among 3,572 eligible sepsis patients, 70% arrived when the ED occupancy rate was greater than or equal to 0.5 and 14% arrived to an overcrowded ED. Median door-to-antibiotic time was 158 minutes (interquartile range 109 to 216 minutes). When the ED was overcrowded, 46% of patients received antibiotics within 3 hours of ED arrival compared with 63% when it was not (difference 14.4%; 95% confidence interval 9.7% to 19.2%). After adjustment, each 10% increase in ED occupancy rate was associated with a 4.0-minute increase (95% confidence interval 2.8 to 5.2 minutes) in door-to-antibiotic time and a decrease in the odds of antibiotic initiation within 3 hours (odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.93). Increasing ED crowding was associated with slower initial patient assessment but not further delays after the initial assessment.
ED crowding was associated with increased sepsis antibiotic delay. Hospitals must devise strategies to optimize sepsis antibiotic administration during periods of ED crowding.
目前,人们对脓毒症早期使用抗生素的障碍仍知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨急诊(ED)拥挤程度与 ED 脓毒症患者抗生素使用时间之间的关系。
本研究为回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2 家社区医院、1 家区域转诊医院和 1 家三级教学医院的 ED 脓毒症患者。主要暴露因素为 ED 入住率,定义为登记的 ED 患者人数与 ED 核定床位之比。ED 过度拥挤定义为 ED 入住率大于或等于 1。我们采用多变量回归来衡量 ED 拥挤与抗生素使用时间(从 ED 到达至首次使用抗生素的时间)之间的调整关联。使用马尔可夫多状态模型,我们还研究了 ED 拥挤与抗生素前治疗过程之间的关系。
在 3572 名符合条件的脓毒症患者中,70%的患者到达时 ED 入住率大于或等于 0.5,14%的患者到达时 ED 过度拥挤。中位数抗生素使用时间为 158 分钟(四分位距 109 至 216 分钟)。当 ED 过度拥挤时,46%的患者在到达 ED 后 3 小时内接受抗生素治疗,而当 ED 不拥挤时,63%的患者在 3 小时内接受抗生素治疗(差异 14.4%;95%置信区间 9.7%至 19.2%)。调整后,ED 入住率每增加 10%,抗生素使用时间延长 4.0 分钟(95%置信区间 2.8 至 5.2 分钟),且 3 小时内开始使用抗生素的可能性降低(比值比 0.90;95%置信区间 0.88 至 0.93)。ED 拥挤程度增加与初始患者评估速度较慢相关,但与初始评估后进一步延误无关。
ED 拥挤与脓毒症抗生素延迟使用有关。医院必须制定策略,以优化 ED 拥挤时的脓毒症抗生素管理。