• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

APSS-ASJ最佳临床研究奖:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者与家长对身体外观的认知是否存在差异?

APSS-ASJ Best Clinical Research Award: Is There a Difference between Patients' and Parents' Perception of Physical Appearance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

作者信息

Chan Chris Yin Wei, Gani Siti Mariam Abd, Lim Min Yuen, Chiu Chee Kidd, Kwan Mun Keong

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):216-224. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0151. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

DOI:10.31616/asj.2018.0151
PMID:30472823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6454293/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

PURPOSE

To compare patients' and parents' perceptions of physical attributes (PAs) of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and to report any correlations between their perceptions and Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) scores.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Few studies have looked into the differences between patients' and parents' perceptions of their appearance.

METHODS

AIS patient-parent pairs (n=170) were recruited. The patients' and parents' perceptions of six PAs were evaluated: waist asymmetry (WA), rib hump (RH), shoulder asymmetry (SA), neck tilt, breast asymmetry (BrA), and chest prominence. These PAs were ranked, and an aggregate PA (Agg-PA) score was derived from a score assigned to the attribute (6 for the most important PA and 1 for the least important). The patients also completed the SRS-22r questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (58.2%) and 71 patients (41.8%) had thoracic and lumbar major curves, respectively. WA was ranked first by 54 patients (31.8%) and 50 parents (29.4%), whereas RH was ranked first by 50 patients (29.4%) and 38 parents (22.4%). The overall Agg-PA scores were similar for patients and parents (p>0.05). However, for thoracic major curves (TMCs) >40°, a significant difference was noted between the Agg-PA scores of patients and parents for SA (3.5±1.6 vs. 4.2±1.6, p=0.041) and BrA (3.0±1.6 vs. 2.2±1.3, p=0.006). For TMCs <40°, a significant difference was found between the Agg-PA scores of patients and parents for WA (3.7±1.6 vs. 4.4±1.5, p=0.050). BrA was negatively correlated with total SRS-22r score.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences between patients and parents in their ranking of the most important PAs. For TMCs >40°, there were significant differences in the Agg-PA for SA and BrA. Pa¬tients were more concerned about BrA and parents were more concerned about SA. Patients' perception of the six PAs had weak correlation with SRS-22r scores.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性研究。

目的

比较患者及其父母对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者身体特征(PA)的认知,并报告他们的认知与脊柱侧凸研究学会-22r(SRS-22r)评分之间的任何相关性。

文献综述

很少有研究探讨患者及其父母对自身外貌认知的差异。

方法

招募了170对AIS患者-父母对。评估了患者及其父母对六个PA的认知:腰部不对称(WA)、肋骨隆起(RH)、肩部不对称(SA)、颈部倾斜、乳房不对称(BrA)和胸部突出。对这些PA进行排序,并从分配给该特征的分数(最重要的PA为6分,最不重要的为1分)得出综合PA(Agg-PA)分数。患者还完成了SRS-22r问卷。

结果

分别有99名患者(58.2%)和71名患者(41.8%)患有胸椎和腰椎主弯。54名患者(31.8%)和50名父母(29.4%)将WA列为第一,而50名患者(29.4%)和38名父母(22.4%)将RH列为第一。患者和父母的总体Agg-PA分数相似(p>0.05)。然而,对于胸椎主弯(TMC)>40°的情况,患者和父母在SA(3.5±1.6对4.2±1.6,p=0.041)和BrA(3.0±1.6对2.2±1.3,p=0.006)的Agg-PA分数上存在显著差异。对于TMC<40°的情况,患者和父母在WA的Agg-PA分数上存在显著差异(3.7±1.6对4.4±1.5,p=0.050)。BrA与SRS-22r总分呈负相关。

结论

患者和父母在最重要PA的排序上没有显著差异。对于TMC>40°的情况,SA和BrA的Agg-PA存在显著差异。患者更关注BrA,而父母更关注SA。患者对六个PA的认知与SRS-22r评分的相关性较弱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9317/6454293/ae2de75cc866/asj-2018-0151f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9317/6454293/4032fa6d9c3f/asj-2018-0151f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9317/6454293/ae2de75cc866/asj-2018-0151f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9317/6454293/4032fa6d9c3f/asj-2018-0151f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9317/6454293/ae2de75cc866/asj-2018-0151f2.jpg

相似文献

1
APSS-ASJ Best Clinical Research Award: Is There a Difference between Patients' and Parents' Perception of Physical Appearance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?APSS-ASJ最佳临床研究奖:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者与家长对身体外观的认知是否存在差异?
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):216-224. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0151. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
Parents' and patients' perceptions of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.父母和患者对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯术后外观的认知
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 15;31(20):2367-74. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240204.98960.dd.
3
Converting Scoliosis Research Society-24 to Scoliosis Research Society-22r in a Surgical-Range, Medical/Interventional Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patient Cohort.在手术范围内的医学/介入性青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者队列中,将脊柱侧弯研究协会-24转换为脊柱侧弯研究协会-22r 。
Spine Deform. 2013 Mar;1(2):108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
4
Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.将SRS-22r问卷映射到青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的EQ-5D-5L效用评分上。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12(4):e0175847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175847. eCollection 2017.
5
3D surface topographic measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are highly correlative to patient self-image questionnaires.特发性脊柱侧凸的 3D 表面形貌测量与患者的自我形象问卷高度相关。
Spine Deform. 2023 Jul;11(4):871-880. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00672-3. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements.与体表测量和影像学测量相比,患者及家长对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯手术前后的认知。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 15;27(14):1543-50; discussion 1551-2. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00012.
7
The minimum detectable measurement difference for the Scoliosis Research Society-22r in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison with the minimum clinically important difference.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的 Scoliosis Research Society-22r 最小可检测测量差值:与最小临床重要差值的比较。
Spine J. 2019 Aug;19(8):1319-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
8
Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.修订版脊柱侧弯研究学会22项问卷荷兰语改编版的信度和效度
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
The effect of Schroth exercises added to the standard of care on the quality of life and muscle endurance in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis-an assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial: "SOSORT 2015 Award Winner".施罗斯疗法(Schroth exercises)联合标准护理对特发性脊柱侧弯青少年生活质量和肌肉耐力的影响——一项评估者和统计学家双盲随机对照试验:“2015年SOSORT奖得主”
Scoliosis. 2015 Sep 18;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13013-015-0048-5. eCollection 2015.
10
Comparison of SRS questionnaire results submitted by both parents and patients in the operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.特发性脊柱侧凸手术治疗中父母与患者提交的SRS问卷结果比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 1;29(3):303-10. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000106489.03355.c5.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients with structural thoracic curve: a computed tomography (CT) morphometric analysis and assessment of patients' perceptions using the Breast-Q™ questionnaire.结构性胸椎侧弯的特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)患者的乳房不对称:一项计算机断层扫描(CT)形态计量分析以及使用乳房Q™问卷对患者认知的评估
Spine Deform. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01080-5.
2
Evaluation of the changes in waistline asymmetry using digital photography in adolescents with idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis after corrective surgery.评估特发性胸腰椎/腰椎脊柱侧凸矫正手术后青少年使用数字摄影测量腰围不对称的变化。
Spine Deform. 2024 Jul;12(4):1079-1088. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00850-x. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Breast Asymmetry in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using an Automated 3D Body Surface Measurement Technique.使用自动三维体表测量技术评估青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者的乳房不对称情况。
Spine Deform. 2017 May;5(3):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.01.001.
2
Is Breast Asymmetry Present in Girls with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的女孩存在乳房不对称吗?
Spine Deform. 2014 Sep;2(5):374-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
3
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯
Patients' Perception and Satisfaction on Neck and Shoulder Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者对颈肩失衡的认知与满意度
Global Spine J. 2023 Apr;13(3):752-763. doi: 10.1177/21925682211007795. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Open Orthop J. 2016 May 30;10:143-54. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010143. eCollection 2016.
4
Post-operative shoulder imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of clinical photographs.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯术后肩部失衡:临床照片研究
Scoliosis. 2015 Nov 17;10:31. doi: 10.1186/s13013-015-0055-6. eCollection 2015.
5
Is neck tilt and shoulder imbalance the same phenomenon? A prospective analysis of 89 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (Lenke type 1 and 2).颈部倾斜和肩部不平衡是同一现象吗?对89例青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者(Lenke 1型和2型)的前瞻性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):401-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4016-9. Epub 2015 May 12.
6
[Perceived self-image in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an integrative review of the literature].[青少年特发性脊柱侧凸中的自我认知形象:文献综合综述]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014 Aug;48(4):748-58. doi: 10.1590/s0080-623420140000400024.
7
Patients' and Parents' Perceptions of Appearance in Scoliosis Treated with a Brace: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.支具治疗脊柱侧弯患者及其家长对外观的认知:一项横断面分析
J Child Fam Stud. 2014;23(7):1163-1171. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9776-4.
8
Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire--Scoliosis Version.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的体像:体像障碍问卷-脊柱侧凸版的验证。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):e61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00867.
9
Perception of stress level, trunk appearance, body function and mental health in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively: a longitudinal analysis.保守治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸女性的压力水平感知、躯干外观、身体功能和心理健康:纵向分析。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1633-45. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0316-2. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
10
Quality of life and stress level in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis subjected to conservative treatment.接受保守治疗的特发性脊柱侧弯青少年的生活质量和压力水平
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;176:419-22.