• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和加拿大局部前列腺癌治疗决策的潜在因素:一项使用主成分分析的范围综述。

Factors underlying treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer in the U.S. and Canada: A scoping review using principal component analysis.

作者信息

Andkhoie Mustafa, Meyer Desneige, Szafron Michael

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Jul;13(7):E220-E225. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5538.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.5538
PMID:30472985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6667325/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this research is to gather, collate, and identify key factors commonly studied in localized prostate cancer (LPC) treatment decision-making in Canada and the U.S.

METHODS

This scoping review uses five databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycInfo) to identify relevant articles using a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria applied by two reviewers. A list of topics describing the themes of the articles was extracted and key factors were identified using principal component analysis (PCA). A word cloud of titles and abstracts of the relevant articles was created to identify complementary results to the PCA.

RESULTS

This review identified 77 relevant articles describing 32 topics related to LPC treatment decision-making. The PCA grouped these 32 topics into five key factors commonly studied in LPC treatment decision-making: 1) treatment type; 2) socioeconomic/demographic characteristics; 3) personal reasons for treatment choice; 4) psychology of treatment decision experience; and 5) level of involvement in the decision-making process. The word cloud identified common phrases that were complementary to the factors identified through the PCA.

CONCLUSIONS

This research identifies several possible factors impacting LPC treatment decision-making. Further research needs to be completed to determine the impact that these factors have in the LPC treatment decision-making experience.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是收集、整理并确定在加拿大和美国局部前列腺癌(LPC)治疗决策中常见的关键因素。

方法

本范围综述使用五个数据库(医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、联合和补充医学数据库以及心理学文摘数据库),由两名评审员根据纳入和排除标准清单来识别相关文章。提取了一份描述文章主题的主题列表,并使用主成分分析(PCA)确定关键因素。创建了相关文章标题和摘要的词云,以识别与主成分分析互补的结果。

结果

本综述确定了77篇相关文章,描述了32个与LPC治疗决策相关的主题。主成分分析将这32个主题分为LPC治疗决策中常见的五个关键因素:1)治疗类型;2)社会经济/人口特征;3)治疗选择的个人原因;4)治疗决策体验的心理因素;5)决策过程中的参与程度。词云确定了与通过主成分分析确定的因素互补的常见短语。

结论

本研究确定了几个可能影响LPC治疗决策的因素。需要完成进一步的研究,以确定这些因素在LPC治疗决策体验中的影响。

相似文献

1
Factors underlying treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer in the U.S. and Canada: A scoping review using principal component analysis.美国和加拿大局部前列腺癌治疗决策的潜在因素:一项使用主成分分析的范围综述。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Jul;13(7):E220-E225. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5538.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Health Care Professionals' Decision Making Related to Mobility and Safety for People in the Hospital: A Scoping Review.卫生保健专业人员在医院中有关行动和安全的决策:范围综述。
Phys Ther. 2023 May 4;103(5). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad024.
5
Examining the effectiveness and implementation of patient treatment decision-aid tools for men with localised prostate cancer: A systematic review.检查局部前列腺癌男性患者治疗决策辅助工具的有效性和实施情况:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2023 Apr;32(4):469-491. doi: 10.1002/pon.6094. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
6
Conceptions of Legacy Among People Making Treatment Choices for Serious Illness: Protocol for a Scoping Review.为重病患者做出治疗选择的人群中的遗产观念:一项范围审查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 9;11(12):e40791. doi: 10.2196/40791.
7
A Qualitative Study of Men's Experiences Using Navigate: A Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Aid.一项关于男性使用“导航”(一种本地化前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具)体验的定性研究。
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Sep 13;8(2):23814683231198003. doi: 10.1177/23814683231198003. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
8
Development and evaluation of the personal patient profile-prostate (P3P), a Web-based decision support system for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.个人患者档案-前列腺(P3P)的开发与评估,这是一个针对新诊断为局限性前列腺癌的男性的基于网络的决策支持系统。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 17;12(4):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1576.
9
Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Visible Minority Groups from a Global Context: A Scoping Review.全球背景下少数族裔群体中与新冠疫苗犹豫相关的因素:一项范围综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;9(12):1445. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9121445.
10
Influential Factors Impacting Treatment Decision-making and Decision Regret in Patients with Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.影响局限性或局部晚期前列腺癌患者治疗决策及决策后悔的相关因素:一项系统文献综述
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Dec;7(6):1216-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Guiding Clinical Decision-Making in Genitourinary Oncology.指导泌尿生殖系统肿瘤临床决策的因素。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70304. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70304.
2
The development of lived experience-centered word clouds to support research uncertainty gathering in degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from an engagement process and protocol for their evaluation, via a nested randomized controlled trial.以患者体验为中心的词汇云图的开发,以支持退行性颈脊髓病研究中的不确定性收集:通过嵌套式随机对照试验,对其进行评估的参与过程和方案的结果。
Trials. 2021 Jun 25;22(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05349-8.
3
Targeting androgen receptor signaling with MicroRNAs and Curcumin: a promising therapeutic approach for Prostate Cancer Prevention and intervention.利用微小RNA和姜黄素靶向雄激素受体信号通路:一种预防和干预前列腺癌的有前景的治疗方法。
Cancer Cell Int. 2021 Jan 26;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01777-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term adverse effects after curative radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy: population-based nationwide register study.根治性放疗和根治性前列腺切除术后的长期不良影响:基于全国人群的登记研究
Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):338-45. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1194460. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
What Is a "Good" Treatment Decision? Decisional Control, Knowledge, Treatment Decision Making, and Quality of Life in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.什么是“好的”治疗决策?临床局限性前列腺癌男性的决策控制、知识、治疗决策制定与生活质量
Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):714-25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16635633. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
3
Racial Differences in Treatment Decision-Making for Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: a Population-Based Study.种族差异对临床局限性前列腺癌男性治疗决策的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Mar;3(1):35-45. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0109-8. Epub 2015 May 5.
4
A prospective cohort study of treatment decision-making for prostate cancer following participation in a multidisciplinary clinic.一项关于参与多学科门诊后前列腺癌治疗决策的前瞻性队列研究。
Urol Oncol. 2016 May;34(5):233.e17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
Involvement in Decision Making and Satisfaction With Treatment Among Partners of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Localized Prostate Cancer.新诊断为局限性前列腺癌患者的伴侣参与决策制定及对治疗的满意度
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015 Nov;42(6):672-9. doi: 10.1188/15.ONF.672-679.
6
Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.知情决策:对医生关于前列腺癌诊断与治疗沟通质量的评估
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):999-1009. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15597226. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
Spirituality is associated with better prostate cancer treatment decision making experiences.精神层面与更好的前列腺癌治疗决策体验相关。
J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;39(1):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9662-1. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
8
Factors Associated with Men's Assessment of Prostate Cancer Treatment Choice.与男性对前列腺癌治疗选择评估相关的因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Jun;31(2):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0837-9.
9
Treatment decisional regret among men with prostate cancer: Racial differences and influential factors in the North Carolina Health Access and Prostate Cancer Treatment Project (HCaP-NC).前列腺癌男性治疗决策后悔:北卡罗来纳州健康获取和前列腺癌治疗项目(HCaP-NC)中的种族差异和影响因素。
Cancer. 2015 Jun 15;121(12):2029-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29309. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
10
When study site contributes to outcomes in a multi-center randomized trial: a secondary analysis of decisional conflict in men with localized prostate cancer.在多中心随机试验中研究地点对结果的影响:对局限性前列腺癌男性决策冲突的二次分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 25;12:159. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0159-3.