Paterson Catherine, Primeau Charlotte, Nabi Ghulam
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee, Aberdeen, AB10 7QG, United Kingdom.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee, Aberdeen, AB10 7QG, United Kingdom.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Dec;37:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
Men with metastatic prostate cancer experience high levels of unmet supportive care needs in current healthcare delivery. We set out to determine the effectiveness of a multimodality supportive care (ThriverCare) intervention on the prevalence of unmet supportive care needs for men and their partner/caregivers.
A prospective parallel group, pilot randomised controlled pilot trial in 4 hospitals in Scotland. 38 participants with radiologically proven metastatic prostate cancer disease and 10 partners/caregivers were recruited into the study. A two arm 1:1 study design compared the usual standard of care (SC) approach to SC plus ThriverCare intervention. The primary outcome was the Supportive Care Needs Survey at 3 months of intervention.
There was no statistical significant difference in the prevalence of unmet supportive care needs between the intervention group and the usual SC group at baseline p = 0.112, however a statistically significant difference was observed at 3 months, indicating that the prevalence of unmet supportive care needs were less in the intervention group (1.13, SD 2.5) compared to the usual SC (6.17, SD 7.05), p = 0.002.
ThriverCare appears to improve the supportive care experience of men with metastatic prostate cancer on hormonal treatment and their partner/caregivers. Our results accentuate that no longer one size of care delivery fits all, care must be responsive and adaptable to meet the individual needs of people affected by cancer to thrive.
在当前的医疗服务中,转移性前列腺癌男性患者的支持性护理需求远未得到满足。我们旨在确定多模式支持性护理(ThriverCare)干预措施对男性患者及其伴侣/护理人员未满足的支持性护理需求患病率的有效性。
在苏格兰的4家医院进行一项前瞻性平行组、试点随机对照试验。招募了38名经放射学证实患有转移性前列腺癌的参与者以及10名伴侣/护理人员。采用1:1的双臂研究设计,将常规标准护理(SC)方法与SC加ThriverCare干预措施进行比较。主要结局是干预3个月时的支持性护理需求调查。
在基线时,干预组和常规SC组之间未满足的支持性护理需求患病率无统计学显著差异(p = 0.112),但在3个月时观察到统计学显著差异,这表明与常规SC组(6.17,标准差7.05)相比,干预组未满足的支持性护理需求患病率更低(1.13,标准差2.5),p = 0.002。
ThriverCare似乎改善了接受激素治疗的转移性前列腺癌男性患者及其伴侣/护理人员的支持性护理体验。我们的结果强调,护理模式不能再一刀切,护理必须具有响应性和适应性,以满足受癌症影响者的个体需求,使其茁壮成长。