Department of Spinal Cord Injury, Sarah Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasília, Brasil.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Jul;43(4):470-475. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1547861. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
The study aimed to test the cross-validation of a specific one maximum repetition (1RM) predictive equation based on the 4- to 12-maximum repetition test (4-12RM) for men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Cross-sectional study. Rehabilitation Hospital Network. Fifty-eight men aged 31.9 (20.0-38.0) years (median and quartile) with SCI were enrolled in the study. None. Volunteers were tested in 1RM test or 4-12RM of the bench press exercise with 2-3 interval days in a random order. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with Bland Altman plot was used to compare a specific predictive equation (SPE) and six current predictive equations (CPE) based on the 4- to 12-maximum repetition with the 1RM test. The SPE showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.91; 95%CI 0.85-0.95), the smallest range of the interval around the differences (Δ = 36.6) and the second lowest mean difference between 1RM test and 1RM predictive equation (-2.4 kg). The CPE3 presented the lowest mean difference (-1.6 kg). All intraclass correlations' predictive equations were classified as excellent. The SPE presented a suitable and satisfactory validity to assess men with SCI at the bench press exercise. Thus, the equation is an accurate method to predict 1RM in SCI.
本研究旨在测试一种特定的最大重复次数(1RM)预测方程在脊髓损伤(SCI)男性中的 4-12 次最大重复测试(4-12RM)的交叉验证。 横断面研究。康复医院网络。 纳入了 58 名年龄为 31.9(20.0-38.0)岁(中位数和四分位数)的 SCI 男性志愿者。 无。志愿者以随机顺序间隔 2-3 天进行 1RM 测试或卧推 4-12RM 测试。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland-Altman 图比较特定预测方程(SPE)和基于 4-12RM 的六个当前预测方程(CPE)与 1RM 测试的相关性。 SPE 显示出最高的组内相关系数(ICC=0.91;95%CI 0.85-0.95)、差异周围间隔最小(Δ=36.6)和 1RM 测试与 1RM 预测方程之间的第二小平均差异(-2.4kg)。CPE3 呈现出最低的平均差异(-1.6kg)。所有组内相关系数的预测方程均被归类为优秀。SPE 在评估 SCI 患者卧推运动时具有合适且令人满意的有效性。因此,该方程是预测 SCI 患者 1RM 的准确方法。