• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-validity of one maximum repetition predictive equation for men with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤男性最大重复预测方程的交叉有效性。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Jul;43(4):470-475. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1547861. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
Validity of one-repetition maximum predictive equations in men with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤男性中一次重复最大量预测方程的有效性
Spinal Cord. 2017 Oct;55(10):950-956. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.49. Epub 2017 May 9.
3
Feasibility and validity of the push-up test for synchronous and asynchronous strength tele-assessment in spinal cord injury individuals with paraplegia.俯卧撑测试用于同步和异步力量远程评估截瘫脊髓损伤个体的可行性和有效性。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Jul;47(4):530-539. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2124651. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Reliability and validity of different methods of estimating the one-repetition maximum during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise.不同方法评估自由重量俯身卧推练习 1 次最大重复次数的可靠性和有效性。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Oct;37(19):2205-2212. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1626071. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
5
Feasibility of the 2-Point Method for Determining the 1-Repetition Maximum in the Bench Press Exercise.两点法测定卧推 1 次最大重复次数的可行性。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Apr 1;13(4):474-481. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0374. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
Validation of the Repetitions in Reserve Rating Scale in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes.《重复储备评级量表在残奥会举重运动员中的验证》。
Int J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;43(4):366-372. doi: 10.1055/a-1587-3919. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
NFL-225 test to predict 1RM bench press in NCAA Division I football players.NFL-225 测试预测 NCAA 一级足球运动员 1RM 卧推。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Oct;26(10):2623-31. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31826791ef.
8
Accuracy of prediction equations for determining one repetition maximum bench press in women before and after resistance training.阻力训练前后用于确定女性卧推一次重复最大值的预测方程的准确性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1570-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817b02ad.
9
Using a Load-Velocity Relationship to Predict One repetition maximum in Free-Weight Exercise: A Comparison of the Different Methods.使用负荷-速度关系预测自由重量练习中的 1 次重复最大重量:不同方法的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Sep;33(9):2409-2419. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002550.
10
Efficacy of the National Football League-225 Test to Track Changes in One Repetition Maximum Bench Press After Training in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division IA Football Players.美国国家橄榄球联盟-225测试对美国国家大学体育协会第一分区甲组橄榄球运动员训练后卧推一次最大重量变化的追踪效果。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29(11):2997-3005. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000829.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and validity of the push-up test for synchronous and asynchronous strength tele-assessment in spinal cord injury individuals with paraplegia.俯卧撑测试用于同步和异步力量远程评估截瘫脊髓损伤个体的可行性和有效性。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Jul;47(4):530-539. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2124651. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of one-repetition maximum predictive equations in men with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤男性中一次重复最大量预测方程的有效性
Spinal Cord. 2017 Oct;55(10):950-956. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.49. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Influence of Relative Strength on Functional Independence of Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.相对力量对脊髓损伤患者功能独立性的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;98(6):1104-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.483. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
4
The validity of submaximal ratings of perceived exertion to predict one repetition maximum.次最大运动感觉用力评级预测 1 次重复最大运动的有效性。
J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Dec 1;8(4):567-73. eCollection 2009.
5
Cardiovascular Health and Exercise Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤中的心血管健康与运动康复
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2007 Summer;13(1):98-122. doi: 10.1310/sci1301-98.
6
Body composition modifications in people with chronic spinal cord injury after supervised physical activity.慢性脊髓损伤患者在接受监督的体育活动后的身体成分变化。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):586-93. doi: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000038.
7
Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.《脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准》2011年修订版参考文献。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):547-54. doi: 10.1179/107902611X13186000420242.
8
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(2011年修订)
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):535-46. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695.
9
The effects of exercise training on physical capacity, strength, body composition and functional performance among adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.运动训练对脊髓损伤成年人身体能力、力量、身体成分和功能表现的影响:系统评价。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Nov;49(11):1103-27. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.62. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
10
Effects of heavy resistance training on strength and power in upper extremities in wheelchair athletes.大阻力训练对上肢运动员力量和功率的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jan;24(1):8-16. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bdddda.

脊髓损伤男性最大重复预测方程的交叉有效性。

Cross-validity of one maximum repetition predictive equation for men with spinal cord injury.

机构信息

Department of Spinal Cord Injury, Sarah Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasília, Brasil.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Jul;43(4):470-475. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1547861. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1080/10790268.2018.1547861
PMID:30475161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7480651/
Abstract

The study aimed to test the cross-validation of a specific one maximum repetition (1RM) predictive equation based on the 4- to 12-maximum repetition test (4-12RM) for men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Cross-sectional study. Rehabilitation Hospital Network. Fifty-eight men aged 31.9 (20.0-38.0) years (median and quartile) with SCI were enrolled in the study. None. Volunteers were tested in 1RM test or 4-12RM of the bench press exercise with 2-3 interval days in a random order. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with Bland Altman plot was used to compare a specific predictive equation (SPE) and six current predictive equations (CPE) based on the 4- to 12-maximum repetition with the 1RM test. The SPE showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.91; 95%CI 0.85-0.95), the smallest range of the interval around the differences (Δ = 36.6) and the second lowest mean difference between 1RM test and 1RM predictive equation (-2.4 kg). The CPE3 presented the lowest mean difference (-1.6 kg). All intraclass correlations' predictive equations were classified as excellent. The SPE presented a suitable and satisfactory validity to assess men with SCI at the bench press exercise. Thus, the equation is an accurate method to predict 1RM in SCI.

摘要

本研究旨在测试一种特定的最大重复次数(1RM)预测方程在脊髓损伤(SCI)男性中的 4-12 次最大重复测试(4-12RM)的交叉验证。 横断面研究。康复医院网络。 纳入了 58 名年龄为 31.9(20.0-38.0)岁(中位数和四分位数)的 SCI 男性志愿者。 无。志愿者以随机顺序间隔 2-3 天进行 1RM 测试或卧推 4-12RM 测试。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland-Altman 图比较特定预测方程(SPE)和基于 4-12RM 的六个当前预测方程(CPE)与 1RM 测试的相关性。 SPE 显示出最高的组内相关系数(ICC=0.91;95%CI 0.85-0.95)、差异周围间隔最小(Δ=36.6)和 1RM 测试与 1RM 预测方程之间的第二小平均差异(-2.4kg)。CPE3 呈现出最低的平均差异(-1.6kg)。所有组内相关系数的预测方程均被归类为优秀。SPE 在评估 SCI 患者卧推运动时具有合适且令人满意的有效性。因此,该方程是预测 SCI 患者 1RM 的准确方法。