• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大口径杯状活检钳进行冷活检钳息肉切除术的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性研究。

Efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy utilizing the jumbo cup: a prospective study.

作者信息

Hasegawa Hiroshi, Bamba Shigeki, Takahashi Kenichiro, Murata Masaki, Otsuka Taketo, Matsumoto Hiroshi, Fujimoto Takehide, Osak Rie, Imaeda Hirotsugu, Nishida Atsushi, Ban Hiromitsu, Sonoda Ayano, Inatomi Osamu, Sasaki Masaya, Sugimoto Mitsushige, Andoh Akira

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.

Division of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Shiga Hospital, Otsu, Japan.

出版信息

Intest Res. 2019 Apr;17(2):265-272. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.00103. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

DOI:10.5217/ir.2018.00103
PMID:30477284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6505094/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are few prospective studies on cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) using jumbo cup forceps. Therefore, we examined patients with diminutive polyps (5 mm or smaller) treated with CFP using jumbo cup forceps to achieve an adenoma-free colon and also assessed the safety of the procedure and the recurrence rate of missed or residual polyp after CFP by performing follow-up colonoscopy 1 year later.

METHODS

We included patients with up to 5 adenomas removed at initial colonoscopy and analyzed data from a total of 361 patients with 573 adenomas. One-year follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 165 patients, at which 251 lesions were confirmed.

RESULTS

The one-bite resection rate with CFP was highest for lesions 3 mm or smaller and decreased significantly with increasing lesion size. Post-procedural hemorrhage was observed in 1 of 573 lesions (0.17%). No perforation was noted. The definite recurrence rate was 0.8% (2/251 lesions). The probable recurrence rate, which was defined as recurrence in the same colorectal segment, was 17%. Adenoma-free colon was achieved in 55% of patients at initial resection. Multivariate analysis revealed that achievement of an adenoma-free colon was significantly associated with number of adenomas and years of endoscopic experience.

CONCLUSIONS

CFP using jumbo biopsy forceps was safe and showed a high one-bite resection rate for diminutive lesions of 3 mm or smaller. The low definite recurrence rate confirms the reliability of CFP using jumbo biopsy forceps. Number of adenomas and years of endoscopic experience were key factors in achieving an adenoma-free colon.

摘要

背景/目的:关于使用大口径杯状钳进行冷活检钳息肉切除术(CFP)的前瞻性研究较少。因此,我们对使用大口径杯状钳进行CFP治疗的微小息肉(5毫米或更小)患者进行了检查,以实现无腺瘤性结肠,并通过1年后进行随访结肠镜检查评估了该手术的安全性以及CFP术后漏诊或残留息肉的复发率。

方法

我们纳入了在初次结肠镜检查时切除多达5个腺瘤的患者,并分析了总共361例患者573个腺瘤的数据。165例患者进行了1年的随访结肠镜检查,确认了251个病变。

结果

CFP的一口切除率在3毫米或更小的病变中最高,并且随着病变大小的增加而显著降低。在573个病变中有1个(0.17%)观察到术后出血。未发现穿孔。明确复发率为0.8%(2/251个病变)。定义为在同一结直肠段复发的可能复发率为17%。55%的患者在初次切除时实现了无腺瘤性结肠。多变量分析显示,实现无腺瘤性结肠与腺瘤数量和内镜经验年限显著相关。

结论

使用大活检钳的CFP是安全的,对于3毫米或更小的微小病变显示出较高的一口切除率。低明确复发率证实了使用大活检钳的CFP的可靠性。腺瘤数量和内镜经验年限是实现无腺瘤性结肠的关键因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/a0d181ca408d/ir-2018-00103f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/020fe67ff476/ir-2018-00103f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/31d29950c2d1/ir-2018-00103f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/2082a3004873/ir-2018-00103f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/d6b722ed8b2f/ir-2018-00103f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/a0d181ca408d/ir-2018-00103f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/020fe67ff476/ir-2018-00103f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/31d29950c2d1/ir-2018-00103f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/2082a3004873/ir-2018-00103f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/d6b722ed8b2f/ir-2018-00103f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b876/6505094/a0d181ca408d/ir-2018-00103f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy utilizing the jumbo cup: a prospective study.使用大口径杯状活检钳进行冷活检钳息肉切除术的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性研究。
Intest Res. 2019 Apr;17(2):265-272. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.00103. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
Local recurrence of diminutive colorectal polyps after cold forceps polypectomy with jumbo forceps followed by magnified narrow-band imaging: a multicenter prospective study.冷活检钳息肉切除术联合巨钳后放大窄带成像对微小结直肠息肉的局部复发:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Endoscopy. 2019 Mar;51(3):253-260. doi: 10.1055/a-0833-8548. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
3
Evaluation of complete cold forceps polypectomy resection rate for 3- to 5-mm colorectal polyps.评估 3-5mm 结直肠息肉完全冷抓活检切除术的切除率。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Sep;33(6):948-954. doi: 10.1111/den.13895. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
4
Endoscopic resection of local recurrences of diminutive polyps by cold forceps polypectomy.冷活检钳息肉切除术治疗微小息肉局部复发。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar;56(3):363-368. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1869821. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
5
What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps?: Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy.治疗微小结肠息肉最准确的方法是什么?:标准钳与大型钳息肉切除术对比
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(15):e621. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000621.
6
Treatment outcomes and recurrence following standard cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive polyps.微小息肉标准冷活检钳息肉切除术的治疗结果及复发情况
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):159-169. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4947-1. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.一项比较巨检活检钳与冷圈套切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1206-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06874-z. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate.冷圈套与冷活检钳切除小腺瘤对节段性不完全切除率的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 1;118(8):1410-1418. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002289. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
Cold snare versus cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of diminutive polyps: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套切除术与冷钳切除术治疗小息肉内镜切除的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jul;98(1):7-18.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.008. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
10
Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps.随机对照试验研究标准大容量活检钳与特大号活检钳用于切除小型无蒂结直肠息肉的效果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Behind the Ink: Unmasking Asymptomatic Micro-perforations Following Endoscopic Tattooing.墨痕背后:揭开内镜纹身术后无症状微小穿孔的面纱
Cureus. 2025 Apr 10;17(4):e81995. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81995. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas.冷活检钳息肉切除术治疗直径≤6mm非壶腹十二指肠低级别腺瘤疗效及安全性的前瞻性多中心研究
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E712-E718. doi: 10.1055/a-1793-9439. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
The quality of colorectal polypectomy. Is it enough to have just a visual assessment of the site?

本文引用的文献

1
New technologies improve adenoma detection rate, adenoma miss rate, and polyp detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新技术提高腺瘤检出率、腺瘤漏检率和息肉检出率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):209-222.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
2
Colonoscopy procedural volume increases adenoma and polyp detection rates in gastroenterologytrainees.结肠镜检查操作量可提高胃肠病学实习生的腺瘤和息肉检出率。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov 16;9(11):540-551. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i11.540.
3
Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
结直肠息肉切除术的质量。仅仅对切除部位进行目视评估是否足够?
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020 Oct-Dec;61(4):1301-1307. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.4.31.
4
Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis Increases the Risk for Bleeding Following Colonoscopic Polypectomy.Child-Pugh B 或 C 级肝硬化增加结肠镜息肉切除术后出血的风险。
Gut Liver. 2020 Nov 15;14(6):755-764. doi: 10.5009/gnl19131.
与监测腺瘤和锯齿状息肉检出率相关的因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Dec;62(12):3579-3585. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4792-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Association Between Colorectal Cancer Mortality and Gradient Fecal Hemoglobin Concentration in Colonoscopy Noncompliers.结肠镜检查不依从者的结直肠癌死亡率与粪便血红蛋白浓度梯度之间的关联
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 May 1;109(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw269.
5
Diet, microorganisms and their metabolites, and colon cancer.饮食、微生物及其代谢产物与结肠癌
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;13(12):691-706. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.165. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
6
Treatment outcomes and recurrence following standard cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive polyps.微小息肉标准冷活检钳息肉切除术的治疗结果及复发情况
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):159-169. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4947-1. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.看得更清晰——关于优化结肠镜腺瘤检出率的循证推荐
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 7;22(5):1767-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1767.
8
Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.男性筛查或监测结肠镜检查中充分肠道准备的量化评估
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos).比较热圈套器、冷圈套器及冷活检钳息肉切除术对微小结直肠息肉的切除效果。一项单中心随机试验研究结果(附视频)
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Feb;3(1):E76-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390789. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
10
What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps?: Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy.治疗微小结肠息肉最准确的方法是什么?:标准钳与大型钳息肉切除术对比
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(15):e621. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000621.