Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验研究标准大容量活检钳与特大号活检钳用于切除小型无蒂结直肠息肉的效果。

Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polypectomy with cold biopsy forceps is a frequently used technique for removal of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. Jumbo forceps may lead to more effective polypectomy because of the larger size of the forceps cup.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficiency of cold jumbo biopsy forceps compared with standard forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Outpatient endoscopy center.

PATIENTS

This study involved 140 patients found to have at least one eligible polyp defined as a sessile polyp measuring ≤6 mm.

INTERVENTION

Polypectomy with cold biopsy forceps.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complete visual polyp eradication with one forceps bite.

RESULTS

In 140 patients, a total of 305 eligible polyps were detected (151 removed with jumbo forceps and 154 with standard forceps). Complete visual eradication of the polyp with one forceps bite was achieved in 78.8% of the jumbo forceps group and 50.7% of the standard forceps group (P < .0001). Biopsies from the polypectomy sites of adenomatous polyps thought to be visually completely eradicated with one bite showed a trend toward a higher complete histologic eradication rate with the jumbo forceps (82.4%) compared with the standard forceps (77.4%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .62). The withdrawal time for visual inspection of the colon and time to perform polypectomies were significantly shorter in the jumbo forceps group (mean 21.43 vs 18.23 minutes; P = .02).

LIMITATIONS

Lack of blinding to the type of forceps used.

CONCLUSION

The jumbo biopsy forceps is superior to the standard forceps in removing small, sessile polyps. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00855790.).

摘要

背景

冷活检钳息肉切除术是一种常用于切除小的、无蒂的结直肠息肉的技术。由于 jumbo 活检钳的钳口较大,因此可能更有效地进行息肉切除术。

目的

评估冷 jumbo 活检钳与标准活检钳用于切除小的、无蒂的结直肠息肉的效果。

设计

随机对照试验。

设置

门诊内镜中心。

患者

本研究纳入了 140 名至少有一个符合条件的息肉的患者,这些息肉被定义为无蒂息肉,大小为≤6mm。

干预措施

冷活检钳息肉切除术。

主要观察指标

一次性钳夹完全清除可见的息肉。

结果

在 140 名患者中,共发现 305 个符合条件的息肉(151 个用 jumbo 活检钳切除,154 个用标准活检钳切除)。用 jumbo 活检钳一次性钳夹完全清除息肉的比例为 78.8%,用标准活检钳为 50.7%(P<.0001)。对于用肉眼认为一次性完全切除的腺瘤性息肉的息肉切除部位活检,jumbo 活检钳的完全组织学切除率呈上升趋势(82.4%),高于标准活检钳(77.4%),但差异无统计学意义(P=.62)。用 jumbo 活检钳进行肉眼检查结肠和进行息肉切除术的时间明显短于标准活检钳(平均 21.43 分钟比 18.23 分钟;P=.02)。

局限性

对使用的活检钳类型缺乏盲法。

结论

jumbo 活检钳在切除小的、无蒂息肉方面优于标准活检钳。(临床试验注册号:NCT00855790。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验