Aslan Fatih, Cekiç Cem, Camci Mehmet, Alper Emrah, Ekinci Nese, Akpinar Zehra, Alpek Serkan, Arabul Mahmut, Unsal Belkis
From the Department of Gastroenterology, KatipCelebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(15):e621. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000621.
Different methods such as standard, hot, and jumbo forceps are used in endoscopic treatment of diminutive colon polyps. In the current study, it was aimed to compare efficacy and safety of standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods in treatment of diminutive colon polyps of ≤5 mm. Polyps with ≤5 mm which were excised during colonoscopy by using standard or jumbo forceps were evaluated. Standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods were randomly performed in 212 consecutive patients with diminutive colorectal polyp. One-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were also determined among polypectomy methods. Results of 161 standard forceps polypectomy and 102 jumbo forceps polypectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Both one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were significantly higher in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group than the standard forceps polypectomy group (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis performed according to polyp sizes, complete resection rate among polyps with 3-mm diameter was determined as 100%. However, numbers of bites in 4-mm and 5-mm polyps were higher in the standard forceps polypectomy group, and complete resection rate was lower than in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group (P < 0.001). Both endoscopic treatment methods may be employed in treatment of diminutive colon polyps with ≤5 mm. However, jumbo forceps polypectomy is a more effective treatment method in 4- to 5-mm polyps with high one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rate.
在内镜治疗微小结肠息肉时会使用不同的方法,如标准钳、热活检钳和大号钳。在本研究中,旨在比较标准钳和大号钳息肉切除术治疗直径≤5mm微小结肠息肉的疗效和安全性。对在结肠镜检查期间使用标准钳或大号钳切除的直径≤5mm的息肉进行评估。对212例连续的微小结直肠息肉患者随机采用标准钳和大号钳息肉切除术。还确定了息肉切除术方法中的一次性咬除息肉率和完全切除率。回顾性评估了161例标准钳息肉切除术和102例大号钳息肉切除术的结果。大号钳息肉切除术组的一次性咬除息肉率和完全切除率均显著高于标准钳息肉切除术组(P<0.001)。在根据息肉大小进行的亚组分析中,直径为3mm的息肉的完全切除率为100%。然而,标准钳息肉切除术组中4mm和5mm息肉的咬除次数更多,完全切除率低于大号钳息肉切除术组(P<0.001)。两种内镜治疗方法均可用于治疗直径≤5mm的微小结肠息肉。然而,大号钳息肉切除术对于4至5mm的息肉是一种更有效的治疗方法,具有较高的一次性咬除息肉率和完全切除率。