Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 May;7(3):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
The objective of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of endobronchial forceps-assisted retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters when standard retrieval techniques fail.
An Institutional Review Board-approved single-center retrospective review during a 6-year period identified 60 consecutive patients (23 men and 37 women; mean age, 49.3 years; range, 19-77 years) in whom rigid endobronchial forceps were required for IVC filter retrieval after standard techniques failed. Factors affecting retrieval success, including an embedded or tilted filter, overall dwell time, filter fracture, and caval penetration, were recorded, as were success rates, procedural details, and complications.
Mean dwell time between filter placement and removal was 565 days (range, 15-7366 days). Various IVC filters were encountered: 33 Option (Argon Medical, Frisco, Tex), 8 Celect (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind), 9 Günther Tulip (Cook Medical), 4 G2 and 3 Eclipse (Bard, Murray Hill, NJ), 2 OptEase (Cordis, Bridgewater, NJ), and 1 Simon Nitinol (Bard). Imaging before retrieval showed grade 1 (3/60), grade 2 (44/60), and grade 3 (13/60) filter interaction with IVC wall. The degree of secondary tilt as assessed on images acquired before attempted retrieval was <10 degrees (n = 22; 36.7%), 10 to 20 degrees (n = 26; 43.3%), and >20 degrees (n = 12; 20%), with an average tilt of 13.8 degrees (range, 0-48.9 degrees). Of the 60 filters, 58 were retrieved successfully (96.7%). Two of these required a second attempt (one because of migration into the right atrium and the other because of extreme discomfort of the patient requiring subsequent general anesthesia). Five of 60 procedures were forceps-assisted loop snare retrievals in which the forceps were used to dissect the embedded hook free from surrounding hyperplastic caval venous endothelium. Mean fluoroscopy retrieval time was 33.2 minutes (range, 10-76.9 minutes). Intraprocedural inconsequential filter fracture was observed in 10 patients. There were four complications: one retroperitoneal hemorrhage, one IVC dissection flap, and two filter fractures with subsequent migration of filter components to the right side of the heart and to the right pulmonary artery. The first two complications required hospital admission and conservative management; in the last two, the fractured and migrated filter limbs were retrieved successfully using a snare device.
Rigid endobronchial forceps can be safely and reliably used to remove embedded, fractured, or tilted retrievable IVC filters from patients in whom standard retrieval techniques are unsuccessful. There is a high success rate and minimal complications. We propose that the degree of filter tilt, caval penetration, and filter fracture are predictive of the need for the use of forceps as a first-line retrieval technique.
本研究旨在评估在标准回收技术失败时,使用支气管内活检钳回收下腔静脉(IVC)滤器的安全性、可行性和有效性。
在 6 年期间,经机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性研究中,确定了 60 例连续患者(23 名男性和 37 名女性;平均年龄 49.3 岁;范围 19-77 岁),在标准技术失败后需要使用刚性支气管活检钳回收 IVC 滤器。记录了影响回收成功率的因素,包括嵌入或倾斜的滤器、总滞留时间、滤器断裂和腔静脉穿透,以及成功率、手术细节和并发症。
滤器放置和取出之间的平均滞留时间为 565 天(范围 15-7366 天)。遇到了各种 IVC 滤器:33 个选项(Argon Medical,Frisco,Tex)、8 个 Celect(Cook Medical,Bloomington,Ind)、9 个 Günther 郁金香(Cook Medical)、4 个 G2 和 3 个 Eclipse(Bard,Murray Hill,NJ)、2 个 OptEase(Cordis,Bridgewater,NJ)和 1 个 Simon Nitinol(Bard)。回收前的影像学检查显示滤器与 IVC 壁的 1 级(3/60)、2 级(44/60)和 3 级(13/60)相互作用。在尝试回收前获得的图像上评估的二次倾斜程度<10 度(n=22;36.7%)、10-20 度(n=26;43.3%)和>20 度(n=12;20%),平均倾斜度为 13.8 度(范围 0-48.9 度)。在 60 个滤器中,58 个成功回收(96.7%)。其中两个需要第二次尝试(一个因为迁移到右心房,另一个因为患者极度不适需要随后进行全身麻醉)。在 60 个程序中有 5 个是使用活检钳辅助圈套器回收,其中活检钳用于将嵌入的钩从周围增生的腔静脉内皮中解剖出来。平均透视回收时间为 33.2 分钟(范围 10-76.9 分钟)。术中观察到 10 例滤器出现无临床意义的断裂。有 4 例并发症:1 例腹膜后出血,1 例 IVC 夹层瓣,2 例滤器断裂,随后滤器的碎片迁移到心脏右侧和右肺动脉。前两种并发症需要住院治疗和保守治疗;在后两种情况下,使用圈套器成功地取出了断裂和迁移的滤器分支。
刚性支气管内活检钳可安全、可靠地用于从标准回收技术不成功的患者中取出嵌入、断裂或倾斜的可回收 IVC 滤器。成功率高,并发症少。我们提出滤器倾斜程度、腔静脉穿透程度和滤器断裂程度是需要使用活检钳作为一线回收技术的预测因素。