• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经支气管活检钳辅助下复杂取出下腔静脉滤器。

Endobronchial forceps-assisted complex retrieval of inferior vena cava filters.

机构信息

Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 May;7(3):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.005
PMID:30477980
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of endobronchial forceps-assisted retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters when standard retrieval techniques fail.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved single-center retrospective review during a 6-year period identified 60 consecutive patients (23 men and 37 women; mean age, 49.3 years; range, 19-77 years) in whom rigid endobronchial forceps were required for IVC filter retrieval after standard techniques failed. Factors affecting retrieval success, including an embedded or tilted filter, overall dwell time, filter fracture, and caval penetration, were recorded, as were success rates, procedural details, and complications.

RESULTS

Mean dwell time between filter placement and removal was 565 days (range, 15-7366 days). Various IVC filters were encountered: 33 Option (Argon Medical, Frisco, Tex), 8 Celect (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind), 9 Günther Tulip (Cook Medical), 4 G2 and 3 Eclipse (Bard, Murray Hill, NJ), 2 OptEase (Cordis, Bridgewater, NJ), and 1 Simon Nitinol (Bard). Imaging before retrieval showed grade 1 (3/60), grade 2 (44/60), and grade 3 (13/60) filter interaction with IVC wall. The degree of secondary tilt as assessed on images acquired before attempted retrieval was <10 degrees (n = 22; 36.7%), 10 to 20 degrees (n = 26; 43.3%), and >20 degrees (n = 12; 20%), with an average tilt of 13.8 degrees (range, 0-48.9 degrees). Of the 60 filters, 58 were retrieved successfully (96.7%). Two of these required a second attempt (one because of migration into the right atrium and the other because of extreme discomfort of the patient requiring subsequent general anesthesia). Five of 60 procedures were forceps-assisted loop snare retrievals in which the forceps were used to dissect the embedded hook free from surrounding hyperplastic caval venous endothelium. Mean fluoroscopy retrieval time was 33.2 minutes (range, 10-76.9 minutes). Intraprocedural inconsequential filter fracture was observed in 10 patients. There were four complications: one retroperitoneal hemorrhage, one IVC dissection flap, and two filter fractures with subsequent migration of filter components to the right side of the heart and to the right pulmonary artery. The first two complications required hospital admission and conservative management; in the last two, the fractured and migrated filter limbs were retrieved successfully using a snare device.

CONCLUSIONS

Rigid endobronchial forceps can be safely and reliably used to remove embedded, fractured, or tilted retrievable IVC filters from patients in whom standard retrieval techniques are unsuccessful. There is a high success rate and minimal complications. We propose that the degree of filter tilt, caval penetration, and filter fracture are predictive of the need for the use of forceps as a first-line retrieval technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在标准回收技术失败时,使用支气管内活检钳回收下腔静脉(IVC)滤器的安全性、可行性和有效性。

方法

在 6 年期间,经机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性研究中,确定了 60 例连续患者(23 名男性和 37 名女性;平均年龄 49.3 岁;范围 19-77 岁),在标准技术失败后需要使用刚性支气管活检钳回收 IVC 滤器。记录了影响回收成功率的因素,包括嵌入或倾斜的滤器、总滞留时间、滤器断裂和腔静脉穿透,以及成功率、手术细节和并发症。

结果

滤器放置和取出之间的平均滞留时间为 565 天(范围 15-7366 天)。遇到了各种 IVC 滤器:33 个选项(Argon Medical,Frisco,Tex)、8 个 Celect(Cook Medical,Bloomington,Ind)、9 个 Günther 郁金香(Cook Medical)、4 个 G2 和 3 个 Eclipse(Bard,Murray Hill,NJ)、2 个 OptEase(Cordis,Bridgewater,NJ)和 1 个 Simon Nitinol(Bard)。回收前的影像学检查显示滤器与 IVC 壁的 1 级(3/60)、2 级(44/60)和 3 级(13/60)相互作用。在尝试回收前获得的图像上评估的二次倾斜程度<10 度(n=22;36.7%)、10-20 度(n=26;43.3%)和>20 度(n=12;20%),平均倾斜度为 13.8 度(范围 0-48.9 度)。在 60 个滤器中,58 个成功回收(96.7%)。其中两个需要第二次尝试(一个因为迁移到右心房,另一个因为患者极度不适需要随后进行全身麻醉)。在 60 个程序中有 5 个是使用活检钳辅助圈套器回收,其中活检钳用于将嵌入的钩从周围增生的腔静脉内皮中解剖出来。平均透视回收时间为 33.2 分钟(范围 10-76.9 分钟)。术中观察到 10 例滤器出现无临床意义的断裂。有 4 例并发症:1 例腹膜后出血,1 例 IVC 夹层瓣,2 例滤器断裂,随后滤器的碎片迁移到心脏右侧和右肺动脉。前两种并发症需要住院治疗和保守治疗;在后两种情况下,使用圈套器成功地取出了断裂和迁移的滤器分支。

结论

刚性支气管内活检钳可安全、可靠地用于从标准回收技术不成功的患者中取出嵌入、断裂或倾斜的可回收 IVC 滤器。成功率高,并发症少。我们提出滤器倾斜程度、腔静脉穿透程度和滤器断裂程度是需要使用活检钳作为一线回收技术的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Endobronchial forceps-assisted complex retrieval of inferior vena cava filters.经支气管活检钳辅助下复杂取出下腔静脉滤器。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 May;7(3):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
2
A 16-F Sheath with Endobronchial Forceps Improves Reported Retrieval Success of Long-Dwelling "Closed Cell" Inferior Vena Cava Filter Designs.一种带有支气管内钳的16F鞘管提高了长留置“闭孔型”下腔静脉滤器设计的报道取出成功率。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.03.047. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Factors predicting failure of retrieval of inferior vena cava filters.预测下腔静脉滤器取出失败的因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
4
Initial experience using the rigid forceps technique to remove wall-embedded IVC filters.使用硬质钳技术取出嵌入血管壁的下腔静脉滤器的初步经验。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jun;59(3):306-11. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12299. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
5
Retrieval of Tip-embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filters by Using the Endobronchial Forceps Technique: Experience at a Single Institution.使用支气管活检钳技术取出尖端嵌入下腔静脉滤器:单机构经验。
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):900-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141420. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
6
Costs and complications of endovascular inferior vena cava filter retrieval.血管内下腔静脉滤器取出的费用和并发症。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Sep;7(5):653-659.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7
Asymptomatic patients with unsuccessful percutaneous inferior vena cava filter retrieval rarely develop complications despite strut penetrations through the caval wall.尽管下腔静脉滤器经腔壁穿透的支撑物很少出现并发症,但经皮下腔静脉滤器取回失败的无症状患者仍很少出现并发症。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Endobronchial Forceps Retrieval of Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Retrieval of 535 Filters at a Single Center.经支气管钳取出嵌顿的下腔静脉滤器:单中心535例滤器取出术
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Apr;34(4):529-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.12.005. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps.植入式下腔静脉滤器取出术:使用支气管内钳
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
10
Predicting inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrievability using positional parameters: A comparative study of various filter types.利用位置参数预测下腔静脉滤器可回收性:各种滤器类型的比较研究。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Oct;99(10):615-624. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracardiopulmonary migration of inferior vena cava filters: An updated systematic review.下腔静脉滤器的心肺内移位:一项最新的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Mar;13(2):102009. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102009. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Successful retrieval of tip-embedded inferior vena cava filter using a modified forceps technique: case report.采用改良钳夹技术成功取出下腔静脉滤器尖端嵌入物:病例报告
Thromb J. 2024 Mar 12;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00595-7.
3
Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails.
下腔静脉滤器取出术中支气管内钳使用的预测因素:圈套器取出失败时
CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Nov 11;6(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00392-9.
4
Endovascular retrieval of a fractured Optease inferior vena cava filter using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance.使用支气管内钳和术中锥形束计算机断层扫描引导对骨折的Optease下腔静脉滤器进行血管内取出。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Apr 12;9(3):101187. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101187. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review.下腔静脉滤器取栓术的先进技术应用:系统评价。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023 May 31;29(3):500-508. doi: 10.4274/dir.2022.22908. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Safety and efficacy of inferior vena cava filter retrieval: a 5-year single center retrospective review from a tertiary care center.下腔静脉滤器取出术的安全性和有效性:来自一家三级医疗中心的5年单中心回顾性研究。
CVIR Endovasc. 2022 Aug 6;5(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s42155-022-00316-z.
7
Rigid forceps and excimer laser use for complex inferior cava filter retrieval: a preliminary quantitative analysis of available evidence.用于复杂下腔静脉滤器取出的刚性钳和准分子激光:现有证据的初步定量分析
CVIR Endovasc. 2022 Jul 8;5(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s42155-022-00311-4.
8
Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up.腔静脉滤器:寻求滤器取出及患者随访的最佳策略
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 3;9:746748. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.746748. eCollection 2022.
9
Percutaneous Extraction of an Embolized IVC Filter Strut Embedded in the Right Ventricle.经皮取出嵌入右心室的栓塞下腔静脉滤器支杆
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Oct 14;2(15):2318-2322. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.07.054. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Laser-Assisted Removal of Embedded Vena Cava Filters: A First-In-Human Escalation Trial in 500 Patients Refractory to High-Force Retrieval.激光辅助取出嵌入型腔静脉滤器:500 例高强度取栓失败患者的人体首次递增试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(24):e017916. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.017916. Epub 2020 Nov 30.