• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

案例研究采用参与式方法:重新思考利益相关者参与实施研究的语用学。

Case Study With a Participatory Approach: Rethinking Pragmatics of Stakeholder Engagement for Implementation Research.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2021 Nov-Dec;19(6):540-546. doi: 10.1370/afm.2717.

DOI:10.1370/afm.2717
PMID:34750129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8575520/
Abstract

The case study design is particularly useful for implementation analysis of complex health care innovations in primary care that can be influenced by the context of dynamic environments. Case studies may be combined with participatory approaches where academics conduct joint research with nonacademic stakeholders, to foster translation of findings results into practice. The aim of this article is to clarify epistemological and methodological considerations of case studies with a participatory approach. It also aims to propose best practice recommendations when using this case study approach. We distinguish between the participatory case study with full co-construction and co-governance, and the case study with a participatory approach whereby stakeholders are consulted in certain phases of the research. We then compare the epistemological posture of 3 prominent case study methodologists, Yin, Stake, and Merriam, to present the epistemological posture of case studies with a participatory approach. The relevance, applications, and procedures of a case study with a participatory approach methodology are illustrated through a concrete example of a primary care research program (PriCARE). We propose 12 steps for designing and conducting a case study with a participatory approach that may help guide researchers in the implementation analysis of complex health care innovations in primary care.

摘要

案例研究设计特别适用于在初级保健中对复杂医疗保健创新进行实施分析,因为这些创新可能会受到动态环境背景的影响。案例研究可以与参与式方法相结合,在这种方法中,学者与非学术利益相关者共同进行研究,以促进研究结果转化为实践。本文旨在阐明具有参与式方法的案例研究的认识论和方法论考虑因素。它还旨在提出使用这种案例研究方法的最佳实践建议。我们区分了具有完全共同构建和共同治理的参与式案例研究,以及在研究的某些阶段咨询利益相关者的具有参与式方法的案例研究。然后,我们将三位著名的案例研究方法论学家 Yin、Stake 和 Merriam 的认识论立场进行比较,以展示具有参与式方法的案例研究的认识论立场。通过初级保健研究计划(PriCARE)的具体示例,说明了参与式案例研究方法的相关性、应用和程序。我们提出了设计和进行具有参与式方法的案例研究的 12 个步骤,这可能有助于指导研究人员在初级保健中对复杂医疗保健创新进行实施分析。

相似文献

1
Case Study With a Participatory Approach: Rethinking Pragmatics of Stakeholder Engagement for Implementation Research.案例研究采用参与式方法:重新思考利益相关者参与实施研究的语用学。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Nov-Dec;19(6):540-546. doi: 10.1370/afm.2717.
2
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.应用 i-PARIHS 框架增强对互动传播的理解,以实现原住民初级医疗的广泛改善。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z.
3
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda.参与式监测和评估方法对决策的影响:来自乌干达东部母婴研究的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0274-9.
5
Material practices for meaningful engagement: An analysis of participatory learning and action research techniques for data generation and analysis in a health research partnership.有意义参与的物质实践:对参与式学习和行动研究技术在健康研究伙伴关系中数据生成和分析的分析。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):159-170. doi: 10.1111/hex.12598. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
6
Engaging stakeholders: lessons from the use of participatory tools for improving maternal and child care health services.让利益相关者参与进来:利用参与式工具改善母婴保健服务的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):106. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0271-z.
7
Framework for Participatory Quantitative Health Impact Assessment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.参与式定量健康影响评估在中低收入国家的框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207688.
8
Evaluating the impact of a network of research partnerships: a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.评估研究伙伴关系网络的影响:一项纵向多案例研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 12;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0377-y.
9
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
10
An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review.参与式方法在医疗器械开发中的利益相关者、方法、主题和挑战概述:范围综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6839. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6839. Epub 2022 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Use of Multiple Participatory Tools to Engage Community Health Workers in Program Evaluation and Implementation: A Case Study From the Philippines.探索使用多种参与式工具让社区卫生工作者参与项目评估与实施:来自菲律宾的案例研究
Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2025 Jul;45(4):351-363. doi: 10.1177/2752535X241280353. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Implementing a tobacco-free workplace program at a substance use treatment center: a case study.在物质使用治疗中心实施无烟工作场所计划:案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10629-5.
3
The Hospital of Tomorrow Case Study: Multidisciplinarity, Inclusiveness and Holistic Approaches to Foster Innovation in Complex Organizations.未来医院案例研究:在复杂组织中培养创新的跨学科、包容性和整体方法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7330. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7330. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
Community and partner engagement in dissemination and implementation research at the National Institutes of Health: an analysis of recently funded studies and opportunities to advance the field.美国国立卫生研究院中社区及合作伙伴参与传播与实施研究的情况:对近期资助研究及推动该领域发展机遇的分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jul 12;4(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00462-y.
5
Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model.患者参与健康实施研究:逻辑模型。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1854-1862. doi: 10.1111/hex.13782. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Implementation analysis of a case management intervention for people with complex care needs in primary care: a multiple case study across Canada.实施分析案例管理干预复杂的照顾需求的人在初级保健:一个多案例研究在加拿大各地。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 19;23(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09379-7.
7
Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient-oriented questionnaires.协调患者舒适度和理解的有效性与挑战:面向患者的问卷指南。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2147-2154. doi: 10.1111/hex.13373. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for a mixed-method analysis of implementation of case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs.针对患有慢性病且有复杂护理需求的医疗服务频繁使用者,在初级保健中实施病例管理的混合方法分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e038241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038241.
2
Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Realist Synthesis.初级保健中频繁使用医疗服务人群的病例管理:一个现实主义综合研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):218-226. doi: 10.1370/afm.2499.
3
Characteristics of Case Management in Primary Care Associated With Positive Outcomes for Frequent Users of Health Care: A Systematic Review.初级保健中与医疗保健频繁使用者积极结果相关的病例管理特征:系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Sep;17(5):448-458. doi: 10.1370/afm.2419.
4
Case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs: an implementation and realist evaluation protocol.基层医疗中对患有慢性病和复杂护理需求的高频医疗服务使用者的病例管理:实施和现实主义评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e026433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026433.
5
Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine.应用四维标准评估急诊医学定性研究的严谨性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2.
6
Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis.将项目理论与评估理论相结合以推进评估实践:还原论、系统思维与务实综合。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
7
Science of the Particular: An Advocacy of Naturalistic Case Study in Health Research.《特定科学:健康研究中自然主义案例研究的主张》
Qual Health Res. 2014 Aug;24(8):1150-1161. doi: 10.1177/1049732314543196. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
8
Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care.理解整合照护:基于初级保健综合功能的全面概念框架。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010. doi: 10.5334/ijic.886. Print 2013 Jan-Mar.
9
Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review.评估参与式研究的效益:进行现实主义综述的基本原理。
Glob Health Promot. 2011 Jun;18(2):45-8. doi: 10.1177/1757975910383936.
10
The case study approach.案例研究法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 27;11:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.