Olsson Anders, Sandblom G, Fränneby U, Sondén A, Gunnarsson U, Dahlstrand U
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):806-811. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4863-8.
The Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ) is a standardised and validated instrument for assessing persisting pain after groin hernia surgery. The IPQ is often perceived as being too extensive for routine use. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a condensed version of the IPQ in order to facilitate its use in daily clinical practice.
The condensed form, i.e. Short-Form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (sf-IPQ), comprises two main items taken from the IPQ. Four hundred patients were recruited from the Swedish Hernia Register and were sent the IPQ, sf-IPQ and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) three years after hernia repair. Ratings from the IPQ and the sf-IPQ were converted to a 12-point scale. The reported scores for the two shared items in the IPQ and sf-IPQ were compared using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Cohen's kappa and McNemar's test.
After two reminders, the response rate was 69.8% (n = 279/400). The ICC for the IPQ and sf-IPQ scores was 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.82, p < 0.001). Cohen's kappa was 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.77, p < 0.001). The sf-IPQ systematically indicated a higher pain score than the IPQ (p = 0.013).
Despite the systematic difference in level of pain scored, correlation, consistency and agreement were seen between the IPQ and sf-IPQ. The forms appear to be interchangeable, though the sf-IPQ may be a more sensitive instrument. The condensed structure of the sf-IPQ is more user-friendly and shows promise as a useful tool in daily clinical practice.
腹股沟疼痛问卷(IPQ)是一种用于评估腹股沟疝修补术后持续性疼痛的标准化且经过验证的工具。IPQ常被认为对于常规使用来说过于冗长。本研究的目的是开发并评估IPQ的精简版,以便于其在日常临床实践中的应用。
精简版,即简式腹股沟疼痛问卷(sf-IPQ),包含从IPQ选取的两个主要项目。从瑞典疝登记处招募了400名患者,并在疝修补术后三年向他们发送了IPQ、sf-IPQ和简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)。IPQ和sf-IPQ的评分被转换为12分制。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、科恩kappa系数和麦克尼马尔检验比较IPQ和sf-IPQ中两个共享项目的报告得分。
经过两次提醒后,回复率为69.8%(n = 279/400)。IPQ和sf-IPQ得分的ICC为0.78(95%置信区间0.73 - 0.82,p < 0.001)。科恩kappa系数为0.66(95%置信区间0.55 - 0.77,p < 0.001)。sf-IPQ系统性地显示出比IPQ更高的疼痛评分(p = 0.013)。
尽管在疼痛评分水平上存在系统性差异,但IPQ和sf-IPQ之间存在相关性、一致性和一致性。尽管sf-IPQ可能是一种更敏感的工具,但这两种形式似乎可以互换。sf-IPQ的精简结构更便于使用,并有望成为日常临床实践中的有用工具。