Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Yale Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Mar;36(3):198-212. doi: 10.1002/da.22854. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
We aimed to examine the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for anxiety disorders examining overall symptom improvement, likelihood of treatment response, time course of treatment response, individual pharmacological agent, diagnostic indication dose, and tolerability.
We searched PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of SSRIs/SNRIs in adult patients with anxiety disorders that provided data at three or more time points. Extracted data included trial duration, weekly/biweekly anxiety scores for 12 weeks.
Meta-analysis included 57 trials (N = 16,056). A linear mixed model analysis based on weekly outcome data suggested that for SNRI a logarithmic model offered the best fit compared to placebo (indicating the greatest incremental improvement from baseline occurred early in treatment); whereas for SSRI a linear model provided the best fit (indicating a similar improvement over the duration of the acute treatment phase). There were no significant differences in efficacy between pharmacological agents within each class or when comparing SSRIs to SNRIs. The greatest treatment benefits were observed for social anxiety disorder for both medication classes. Higher doses of SSRIs, but not SNRIs, were associated with significantly greater symptom improvement and likelihood of treatment response. For both medical classes, higher doses were associated with an increased likelihood of dropout due to side effects.
SSRIs and SNRIs are effective in treating anxiety disorders. Higher doses of SSRIs within the therapeutic range are associated with greater treatment benefit, whereas higher doses of SNRIs are not.
我们旨在研究选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和 5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)对焦虑症的疗效,考察整体症状改善、治疗反应的可能性、治疗反应的时间进程、单一药物、诊断指征剂量和耐受性。
我们检索了 PubMed 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。我们纳入了在患有焦虑症的成年患者中进行的、比较 SSRIs/SNRIs 与安慰剂的随机安慰剂对照临床试验,这些试验提供了至少三个时间点的资料。提取的数据包括试验持续时间、12 周内每周/每两周的焦虑评分。
荟萃分析纳入了 57 项试验(N=16056)。基于每周结局数据的线性混合模型分析表明,与安慰剂相比,SNRI 对数模型提供了最佳拟合(表明从治疗早期开始就出现了最大的增量改善);而 SSRIs 线性模型提供了最佳拟合(表明在急性治疗阶段的整个过程中都有相似的改善)。在每个类别内的药物之间或比较 SSRIs 与 SNRIs 时,药物疗效之间没有显著差异。两种药物类别对社交焦虑症都有最大的治疗益处。SSRIs 的较高剂量,但不是 SNRIs 的较高剂量,与症状改善和治疗反应的可能性显著增加相关。对于这两种药物类别,较高剂量与因副作用而停药的可能性增加相关。
SSRIs 和 SNRIs 对治疗焦虑症有效。在治疗范围内,SSRIs 的较高剂量与更大的治疗益处相关,而 SNRIs 的较高剂量则没有。